LLETZ后的跟进:是否可以根据复发的风险调整时间?

G Flannelly, B Bolger, H Fawzi, A De Barros Lopes, J.M Monaghan
{"title":"LLETZ后的跟进:是否可以根据复发的风险调整时间?","authors":"G Flannelly,&nbsp;B Bolger,&nbsp;H Fawzi,&nbsp;A De Barros Lopes,&nbsp;J.M Monaghan","doi":"10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00240-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objectives</strong> To document the pattern of recurrence of disease following large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) to identify a low risk group of women who might benefit from less intensive cytological surveillance.</p><p><strong>Design</strong> Analysis of prospectively collected information with retrospective review of follow up smears.</p><p><strong>Population</strong> Three thousand, five hundred and sixty women who underwent LLETZ (median age 31 years; IQR 12 years).</p><p><strong>Setting</strong> Colposcopy clinic at Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Gateshead.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong> Women treated with LLETZ from 1988 to 1995 were reviewed. Information on the pathology from LLETZ was collected prospectively and information on the subsequent smears was obtained from the family health authorities.</p><p><strong>Results</strong> Invasive cancer was detected on the original LLETZ in 134 women who were excluded from the study. Of the remaining 3426 women, histology of LLETZ showed high grade CIN (II and III) in 2371 (69%). At least one follow up smear was undertaken in 3385 women (99%). This constituted 9765 women years of follow up with a mean duration of 35 months. Four hundred and seventeen women (12.2%) had a dyskaryotic follow up smear. Incomplete excision of the lesion and an age of ≥ 50 years at the time of the LLETZ were associated with an increased risk of recurrent CIN. Based on these risk factors the study group was divided into three risk groups: 1. women aged &lt; 50 with no disease at the margins (<em>n</em>=1680); 2. women aged ≥ 50 with disease at the margins (<em>n</em>=93); and 3. women aged &lt; 50 with positive margins, or aged ≥ 50 with negative margins (<em>n</em>=1653). The cumulative survival without recurrent CIN at five years for these groups were 92%, 57% and 86%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong> Women aged ≥ 50 with CIN at the margins of excision constituted a small minority high risk group (3%). Consideration should be given to repeat treatment of these women rather than surveillance. Women aged &lt; 50 with complete excision of low grade CIN comprised 51% of the study group. These women were at low risk of recurrent CIN and might benefit from less intensive cytological surveillance following LLETZ.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75620,"journal":{"name":"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology","volume":"108 10","pages":"Pages 1025-1030"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00240-6","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Follow up after LLETZ: could schedules be modified according to risk of recurrence?\",\"authors\":\"G Flannelly,&nbsp;B Bolger,&nbsp;H Fawzi,&nbsp;A De Barros Lopes,&nbsp;J.M Monaghan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00240-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><strong>Objectives</strong> To document the pattern of recurrence of disease following large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) to identify a low risk group of women who might benefit from less intensive cytological surveillance.</p><p><strong>Design</strong> Analysis of prospectively collected information with retrospective review of follow up smears.</p><p><strong>Population</strong> Three thousand, five hundred and sixty women who underwent LLETZ (median age 31 years; IQR 12 years).</p><p><strong>Setting</strong> Colposcopy clinic at Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Gateshead.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong> Women treated with LLETZ from 1988 to 1995 were reviewed. Information on the pathology from LLETZ was collected prospectively and information on the subsequent smears was obtained from the family health authorities.</p><p><strong>Results</strong> Invasive cancer was detected on the original LLETZ in 134 women who were excluded from the study. Of the remaining 3426 women, histology of LLETZ showed high grade CIN (II and III) in 2371 (69%). At least one follow up smear was undertaken in 3385 women (99%). This constituted 9765 women years of follow up with a mean duration of 35 months. Four hundred and seventeen women (12.2%) had a dyskaryotic follow up smear. Incomplete excision of the lesion and an age of ≥ 50 years at the time of the LLETZ were associated with an increased risk of recurrent CIN. Based on these risk factors the study group was divided into three risk groups: 1. women aged &lt; 50 with no disease at the margins (<em>n</em>=1680); 2. women aged ≥ 50 with disease at the margins (<em>n</em>=93); and 3. women aged &lt; 50 with positive margins, or aged ≥ 50 with negative margins (<em>n</em>=1653). The cumulative survival without recurrent CIN at five years for these groups were 92%, 57% and 86%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong> Women aged ≥ 50 with CIN at the margins of excision constituted a small minority high risk group (3%). Consideration should be given to repeat treatment of these women rather than surveillance. Women aged &lt; 50 with complete excision of low grade CIN comprised 51% of the study group. These women were at low risk of recurrent CIN and might benefit from less intensive cytological surveillance following LLETZ.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"108 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1025-1030\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00240-6\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306545601002406\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306545601002406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的记录转化区大环切除(LLETZ)后疾病复发的模式,以确定可能从较低强度细胞学监测中获益的低风险女性群体。设计对前瞻性收集的信息进行分析,并对随访涂片进行回顾性评价。人口:35,560名接受LLETZ的女性(中位年龄31岁;12年)。设置阴道镜诊所在北方妇科肿瘤中心,盖茨黑德。方法回顾性分析1988 ~ 1995年接受LLETZ治疗的妇女的临床资料。前瞻性地收集了来自LLETZ的病理信息,并从家庭卫生当局获得了随后涂片的信息。结果134名被排除在外的女性在LLETZ上发现了浸润性肿瘤。在剩余的3426名女性中,2371名(69%)LLETZ组织学显示高级别CIN (II和III)。3385名妇女(99%)至少进行了一次随访涂片检查。这构成了9765名妇女年的随访,平均持续时间为35个月。417名妇女(12.2%)有核异常随访涂片。病变不完全切除和LLETZ时年龄≥50岁与CIN复发风险增加相关。根据这些危险因素,将研究组分为三个危险组:1。老年妇女50例边缘无疾病(n=1680);2. 年龄≥50岁伴有边缘病变的女性(n=93);和3。老年妇女50例边缘阳性,或年龄≥50例边缘阴性(n=1653)。5年无复发CIN的累积生存率分别为92%,57%和86%。结论≥50岁的女性在切除边缘发生CIN是少数高危人群(3%)。应考虑对这些妇女进行重复治疗,而不是进行监视。老年妇女完全切除低级别CIN的50例占研究组的51%。这些妇女复发CIN的风险较低,可能受益于LLETZ后较低强度的细胞学监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Follow up after LLETZ: could schedules be modified according to risk of recurrence?

Objectives To document the pattern of recurrence of disease following large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) to identify a low risk group of women who might benefit from less intensive cytological surveillance.

Design Analysis of prospectively collected information with retrospective review of follow up smears.

Population Three thousand, five hundred and sixty women who underwent LLETZ (median age 31 years; IQR 12 years).

Setting Colposcopy clinic at Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Gateshead.

Methods Women treated with LLETZ from 1988 to 1995 were reviewed. Information on the pathology from LLETZ was collected prospectively and information on the subsequent smears was obtained from the family health authorities.

Results Invasive cancer was detected on the original LLETZ in 134 women who were excluded from the study. Of the remaining 3426 women, histology of LLETZ showed high grade CIN (II and III) in 2371 (69%). At least one follow up smear was undertaken in 3385 women (99%). This constituted 9765 women years of follow up with a mean duration of 35 months. Four hundred and seventeen women (12.2%) had a dyskaryotic follow up smear. Incomplete excision of the lesion and an age of ≥ 50 years at the time of the LLETZ were associated with an increased risk of recurrent CIN. Based on these risk factors the study group was divided into three risk groups: 1. women aged < 50 with no disease at the margins (n=1680); 2. women aged ≥ 50 with disease at the margins (n=93); and 3. women aged < 50 with positive margins, or aged ≥ 50 with negative margins (n=1653). The cumulative survival without recurrent CIN at five years for these groups were 92%, 57% and 86%, respectively.

Conclusion Women aged ≥ 50 with CIN at the margins of excision constituted a small minority high risk group (3%). Consideration should be given to repeat treatment of these women rather than surveillance. Women aged < 50 with complete excision of low grade CIN comprised 51% of the study group. These women were at low risk of recurrent CIN and might benefit from less intensive cytological surveillance following LLETZ.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信