浸润子宫骶韧带的深部子宫内膜异位症表现为不对称的外侧分布吗?

Charles Chapron , Arnaud Fauconnier , Jean-Bernard Dubuisson , Marco Vieira , Hélène Bonte , Marie-Cécile Vacher-Lavenu
{"title":"浸润子宫骶韧带的深部子宫内膜异位症表现为不对称的外侧分布吗?","authors":"Charles Chapron ,&nbsp;Arnaud Fauconnier ,&nbsp;Jean-Bernard Dubuisson ,&nbsp;Marco Vieira ,&nbsp;Hélène Bonte ,&nbsp;Marie-Cécile Vacher-Lavenu","doi":"10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00236-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objective</strong> To investigate whether deeply infiltrating endometriosis occurs with equal frequency between left and right uterosacral ligaments.</p><p><strong>Design</strong> Retrospective analysis of consecutive cases.</p><p><strong>Setting</strong> Department of gynaecological surgery in a tertiary care university hospital in Paris, France.</p><p><strong>Population</strong> One hundred and thirty consecutive women with laparoscopic resection of histologically proven deep endometriosis infiltrating the uterosacral ligaments.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong> Laterality, intraoperative aspect of the uterosacral ligaments, and associated endometriosis were recorded during laparoscopy. Deep endometriosis infiltrating the uterosacral ligaments was considered as histologically proven in the presence of endometrial glands and stroma.</p><p><strong>Main</strong> <strong>outcome measure</strong> Frequency of left- and right-sided deep endometriosis infiltrating the uterosacral ligaments.</p><p><strong>Results</strong> The left uterosacral ligament alone was involved in 69 cases; the right uterosacral ligament alone was involved in 38 cases; both were involved in 23 cases. For patients with unilateral deep endometriosis infiltrating the uterosacral ligaments the observed proportion of endometriosis involving the left uterosacral ligament (69/107, 64.5%) was significantly different from the expected proportion of 50% (<em>χ</em><sup>2</sup>=8.98; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong> Anatomical differences between left and right hemipelvis and differences in the frequency of ovulation between right and left ovary could explain these results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75620,"journal":{"name":"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology","volume":"108 10","pages":"Pages 1021-1024"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00236-4","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does deep endometriosis infiltrating the uterosacral ligaments present an asymmetric lateral distribution?\",\"authors\":\"Charles Chapron ,&nbsp;Arnaud Fauconnier ,&nbsp;Jean-Bernard Dubuisson ,&nbsp;Marco Vieira ,&nbsp;Hélène Bonte ,&nbsp;Marie-Cécile Vacher-Lavenu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00236-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><strong>Objective</strong> To investigate whether deeply infiltrating endometriosis occurs with equal frequency between left and right uterosacral ligaments.</p><p><strong>Design</strong> Retrospective analysis of consecutive cases.</p><p><strong>Setting</strong> Department of gynaecological surgery in a tertiary care university hospital in Paris, France.</p><p><strong>Population</strong> One hundred and thirty consecutive women with laparoscopic resection of histologically proven deep endometriosis infiltrating the uterosacral ligaments.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong> Laterality, intraoperative aspect of the uterosacral ligaments, and associated endometriosis were recorded during laparoscopy. Deep endometriosis infiltrating the uterosacral ligaments was considered as histologically proven in the presence of endometrial glands and stroma.</p><p><strong>Main</strong> <strong>outcome measure</strong> Frequency of left- and right-sided deep endometriosis infiltrating the uterosacral ligaments.</p><p><strong>Results</strong> The left uterosacral ligament alone was involved in 69 cases; the right uterosacral ligament alone was involved in 38 cases; both were involved in 23 cases. For patients with unilateral deep endometriosis infiltrating the uterosacral ligaments the observed proportion of endometriosis involving the left uterosacral ligament (69/107, 64.5%) was significantly different from the expected proportion of 50% (<em>χ</em><sup>2</sup>=8.98; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong> Anatomical differences between left and right hemipelvis and differences in the frequency of ovulation between right and left ovary could explain these results.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"108 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1021-1024\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00236-4\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306545601002364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306545601002364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨深浸润性子宫内膜异位症在左右子宫骶韧带间的发生频率是否相同。设计对连续病例进行回顾性分析。背景:法国巴黎某三级大学医院妇科外科。人群:连续130例经组织学证实浸润子宫骶韧带的深部子宫内膜异位症患者行腹腔镜切除术。方法在腹腔镜下记录子宫骶韧带侧位、术中表现及相关子宫内膜异位症。深子宫内膜异位症浸润子宫骶韧带被认为是组织学证实存在子宫内膜腺体和间质。主要观察指标:左侧和右侧深部子宫内膜异位症浸润子宫骶韧带的频率。结果仅左侧子宫骶韧带受累69例;仅右腹骶韧带受累38例;两人都参与了23起案件。单侧深部子宫内膜异位症浸润子宫骶韧带患者中,累及左侧子宫骶韧带的子宫内膜异位症比例(69/107,64.5%)与预期比例(50%)差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.98;P & lt;0.01)。结论左右半骨盆的解剖差异和左右卵巢排卵频率的差异可以解释上述结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does deep endometriosis infiltrating the uterosacral ligaments present an asymmetric lateral distribution?

Objective To investigate whether deeply infiltrating endometriosis occurs with equal frequency between left and right uterosacral ligaments.

Design Retrospective analysis of consecutive cases.

Setting Department of gynaecological surgery in a tertiary care university hospital in Paris, France.

Population One hundred and thirty consecutive women with laparoscopic resection of histologically proven deep endometriosis infiltrating the uterosacral ligaments.

Methods Laterality, intraoperative aspect of the uterosacral ligaments, and associated endometriosis were recorded during laparoscopy. Deep endometriosis infiltrating the uterosacral ligaments was considered as histologically proven in the presence of endometrial glands and stroma.

Main outcome measure Frequency of left- and right-sided deep endometriosis infiltrating the uterosacral ligaments.

Results The left uterosacral ligament alone was involved in 69 cases; the right uterosacral ligament alone was involved in 38 cases; both were involved in 23 cases. For patients with unilateral deep endometriosis infiltrating the uterosacral ligaments the observed proportion of endometriosis involving the left uterosacral ligament (69/107, 64.5%) was significantly different from the expected proportion of 50% (χ2=8.98; P < 0.01).

Conclusion Anatomical differences between left and right hemipelvis and differences in the frequency of ovulation between right and left ovary could explain these results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信