训练对手术结可靠性的影响

Thomas E.J Ind , Julia C Shelton , John H Shepherd
{"title":"训练对手术结可靠性的影响","authors":"Thomas E.J Ind ,&nbsp;Julia C Shelton ,&nbsp;John H Shepherd","doi":"10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00251-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objectives</strong> To determine whether trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology tie adequate surgical knots and to assess whether formal training improves knot tying skills.</p><p><strong>Design</strong> A comparative study assessing surgical knots before and after tuition.</p><p><strong>Population</strong> Fourteen trainees in a single obstetrics and gynaecology department.</p><p><strong>Setting</strong> A basic surgical skills workshop based in a London teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong> Trainees tied surgical knots around a 120mm jig using 2/0 glycan polymer. Each trainee tied 11 knots before and after a two and a half hour teaching session. Knots were tested using a mechanical testing machine.</p><p><strong>Outcome</strong> <strong>measures</strong> Knot strength (<em>N</em>); proportion of knots that were ‘secure’ (defined as those that eventually failed on the testing device by breakage rather than slippage); proportion of knots that were ‘dangerous’ (defined as those with a tensile strength of &lt; 5 <em>N</em>).</p><p><strong>Results</strong> After tuition, the median knot strength of the whole group was 5.7 <em>N</em> stronger than before instruction (95% CI 4.6–12.3 <em>N</em>). Prior to tuition 13.5% (20/148) knots tied had a tensile strength of &lt; 5 <em>N</em>. This was compared with 3.4% (5/148) after tuition (OR = 0.2, 95% CI 0.1–0.6). Before instruction 55.4% (82/148) of the knots were secure compared with 66.9% (99/148) after tuition (OR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.0–2.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong> Knot tying workshops can improve the ability of trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology to tie reef knots.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75620,"journal":{"name":"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology","volume":"108 10","pages":"Pages 1013-1016"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00251-0","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of training on reliability of surgical knots\",\"authors\":\"Thomas E.J Ind ,&nbsp;Julia C Shelton ,&nbsp;John H Shepherd\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00251-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><strong>Objectives</strong> To determine whether trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology tie adequate surgical knots and to assess whether formal training improves knot tying skills.</p><p><strong>Design</strong> A comparative study assessing surgical knots before and after tuition.</p><p><strong>Population</strong> Fourteen trainees in a single obstetrics and gynaecology department.</p><p><strong>Setting</strong> A basic surgical skills workshop based in a London teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong> Trainees tied surgical knots around a 120mm jig using 2/0 glycan polymer. Each trainee tied 11 knots before and after a two and a half hour teaching session. Knots were tested using a mechanical testing machine.</p><p><strong>Outcome</strong> <strong>measures</strong> Knot strength (<em>N</em>); proportion of knots that were ‘secure’ (defined as those that eventually failed on the testing device by breakage rather than slippage); proportion of knots that were ‘dangerous’ (defined as those with a tensile strength of &lt; 5 <em>N</em>).</p><p><strong>Results</strong> After tuition, the median knot strength of the whole group was 5.7 <em>N</em> stronger than before instruction (95% CI 4.6–12.3 <em>N</em>). Prior to tuition 13.5% (20/148) knots tied had a tensile strength of &lt; 5 <em>N</em>. This was compared with 3.4% (5/148) after tuition (OR = 0.2, 95% CI 0.1–0.6). Before instruction 55.4% (82/148) of the knots were secure compared with 66.9% (99/148) after tuition (OR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.0–2.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong> Knot tying workshops can improve the ability of trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology to tie reef knots.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"108 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1013-1016\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00251-0\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306545601002510\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306545601002510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的了解妇产科受训者是否能正确打结,并评估正规培训是否能提高打结技能。设计一项比较研究,评估手术结前和后的教学。人口一个产科和妇科的14名实习生。背景:伦敦某教学医院的基础外科技能讲习班。方法学员使用2/0聚糖聚合物在120mm的夹具周围打结。在两个半小时的教学之前和之后,每个学员都打了11个结。用机械试验机对结进行测试。结强度(N);“安全”结的比例(定义为最终在测试设备上因断裂而不是滑移而失效的结);“危险”结的比例(定义为抗拉强度为<结果教学后,全组的中位结强度比教学前提高了5.7 N (95% CI 4.6-12.3 N)。教学前,13.5%(20/148)的结的抗拉强度为<这与学费后的3.4%(5/148)相比(OR = 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.6)。教学前55.4%(82/148)结牢固,教学后66.9%(99/148)结牢固(OR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.7)。结论打结研修班能提高妇产科学员打礁结的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of training on reliability of surgical knots

Objectives To determine whether trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology tie adequate surgical knots and to assess whether formal training improves knot tying skills.

Design A comparative study assessing surgical knots before and after tuition.

Population Fourteen trainees in a single obstetrics and gynaecology department.

Setting A basic surgical skills workshop based in a London teaching hospital.

Methods Trainees tied surgical knots around a 120mm jig using 2/0 glycan polymer. Each trainee tied 11 knots before and after a two and a half hour teaching session. Knots were tested using a mechanical testing machine.

Outcome measures Knot strength (N); proportion of knots that were ‘secure’ (defined as those that eventually failed on the testing device by breakage rather than slippage); proportion of knots that were ‘dangerous’ (defined as those with a tensile strength of < 5 N).

Results After tuition, the median knot strength of the whole group was 5.7 N stronger than before instruction (95% CI 4.6–12.3 N). Prior to tuition 13.5% (20/148) knots tied had a tensile strength of < 5 N. This was compared with 3.4% (5/148) after tuition (OR = 0.2, 95% CI 0.1–0.6). Before instruction 55.4% (82/148) of the knots were secure compared with 66.9% (99/148) after tuition (OR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.0–2.7).

Conclusion Knot tying workshops can improve the ability of trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology to tie reef knots.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信