Bo-Chao Cheng, Alexander D Stoyenko , Thomas J Marlowe
{"title":"最小空间优先调度算法:多处理器系统中复杂实时任务的调度策略","authors":"Bo-Chao Cheng, Alexander D Stoyenko , Thomas J Marlowe","doi":"10.1016/0066-4138(94)90007-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Significant prior work exists on scheduling for the ‘simple-tasks-single-processor’, ‘simple-tasks-multiple-processor’, and ‘complex-tasks-single-processor’, but few researchers have yet considered the ‘complex-tasks-multiple-processor’ model. We propose a new algorithm, Least Space-Time First (LSTF), to deal with the general ‘complex-task-multiple-processor’ model. We demonstrate that LSTF outperforms the Highest-Level-First, Earliest-Deadline-First and Least-Laxity-First scheduling disciplines in the sense of minimizing maximum tardiness of a set of tasks. LSTF can gracefully incorporate some realistic overhead assumptions, including context switch and communication. The Unit Precedence Graph and Soft-Precedence Edges significantly facilitate implementation of LSTF.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100097,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review in Automatic Programming","volume":"18 ","pages":"Pages 33-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0066-4138(94)90007-8","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Least-space-time-first scheduling algorithm: A policy for complex real-time tasks in multiple processor systems\",\"authors\":\"Bo-Chao Cheng, Alexander D Stoyenko , Thomas J Marlowe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0066-4138(94)90007-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Significant prior work exists on scheduling for the ‘simple-tasks-single-processor’, ‘simple-tasks-multiple-processor’, and ‘complex-tasks-single-processor’, but few researchers have yet considered the ‘complex-tasks-multiple-processor’ model. We propose a new algorithm, Least Space-Time First (LSTF), to deal with the general ‘complex-task-multiple-processor’ model. We demonstrate that LSTF outperforms the Highest-Level-First, Earliest-Deadline-First and Least-Laxity-First scheduling disciplines in the sense of minimizing maximum tardiness of a set of tasks. LSTF can gracefully incorporate some realistic overhead assumptions, including context switch and communication. The Unit Precedence Graph and Soft-Precedence Edges significantly facilitate implementation of LSTF.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Review in Automatic Programming\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 33-38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0066-4138(94)90007-8\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Review in Automatic Programming\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0066413894900078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review in Automatic Programming","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0066413894900078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Least-space-time-first scheduling algorithm: A policy for complex real-time tasks in multiple processor systems
Significant prior work exists on scheduling for the ‘simple-tasks-single-processor’, ‘simple-tasks-multiple-processor’, and ‘complex-tasks-single-processor’, but few researchers have yet considered the ‘complex-tasks-multiple-processor’ model. We propose a new algorithm, Least Space-Time First (LSTF), to deal with the general ‘complex-task-multiple-processor’ model. We demonstrate that LSTF outperforms the Highest-Level-First, Earliest-Deadline-First and Least-Laxity-First scheduling disciplines in the sense of minimizing maximum tardiness of a set of tasks. LSTF can gracefully incorporate some realistic overhead assumptions, including context switch and communication. The Unit Precedence Graph and Soft-Precedence Edges significantly facilitate implementation of LSTF.