全渠道零售退货操作与消费者失望厌恶

IF 3.7 4区 管理学 Q2 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Yinhai Shen , Qing Zhang , Zhichao Zhang , Xinyu Ma
{"title":"全渠道零售退货操作与消费者失望厌恶","authors":"Yinhai Shen ,&nbsp;Qing Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhichao Zhang ,&nbsp;Xinyu Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.orp.2022.100253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Product returns is a widespread phenomenon associated with online retailing, where both consumer behavior and retailers’ operation decisions are inextricable topics. To improve the returns experience, retailers have forayed into omnichannel return operations and consumers are sophisticated enough to make strategic channel decisions.</p><p>Taking into account consumer disappointment aversion triggered by value uncertainty online, three return configurations were explored: non-return, same-channel return and omnichannel return and the impacts of disappointment aversion on the retailer's optimal pricing, return penalty, and profitability are investigated. The most important conclusion is that the effect of disappointment aversion on return strategy is influenced by distinct product return rate. We identify conditions under which the retailer should choose omnichannel return strategy and the other key findings show that the optimal pricing under a same-channel strategy should be no lower than the other two strategies, and depending on the level of unit travel cost, the optimal pricing is symmetric on different disappointment aversion intervals and the correlations are opposite. The return penalty keeps down with disappointment aversion. The retailer will implement a non-return policy only when return rate is relatively high. When both the return rate and the disappointment aversion is intermediate, the same-channel return is the optimal strategy. However, it is only profitable for retailers to implement an omnichannel return strategy when disappointment aversion is low, which supports for the retailer's choice of return strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38055,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716022000240/pdfft?md5=a070d4ec1d0edee4bafce9375f94dedb&pid=1-s2.0-S2214716022000240-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Omnichannel retailing return operations with consumer disappointment aversion\",\"authors\":\"Yinhai Shen ,&nbsp;Qing Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhichao Zhang ,&nbsp;Xinyu Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.orp.2022.100253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Product returns is a widespread phenomenon associated with online retailing, where both consumer behavior and retailers’ operation decisions are inextricable topics. To improve the returns experience, retailers have forayed into omnichannel return operations and consumers are sophisticated enough to make strategic channel decisions.</p><p>Taking into account consumer disappointment aversion triggered by value uncertainty online, three return configurations were explored: non-return, same-channel return and omnichannel return and the impacts of disappointment aversion on the retailer's optimal pricing, return penalty, and profitability are investigated. The most important conclusion is that the effect of disappointment aversion on return strategy is influenced by distinct product return rate. We identify conditions under which the retailer should choose omnichannel return strategy and the other key findings show that the optimal pricing under a same-channel strategy should be no lower than the other two strategies, and depending on the level of unit travel cost, the optimal pricing is symmetric on different disappointment aversion intervals and the correlations are opposite. The return penalty keeps down with disappointment aversion. The retailer will implement a non-return policy only when return rate is relatively high. When both the return rate and the disappointment aversion is intermediate, the same-channel return is the optimal strategy. However, it is only profitable for retailers to implement an omnichannel return strategy when disappointment aversion is low, which supports for the retailer's choice of return strategies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operations Research Perspectives\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716022000240/pdfft?md5=a070d4ec1d0edee4bafce9375f94dedb&pid=1-s2.0-S2214716022000240-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operations Research Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716022000240\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716022000240","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

产品退货是与网络零售相关的普遍现象,消费者行为和零售商的经营决策是密不可分的话题。为了改善退货体验,零售商开始涉足全渠道退货业务,而消费者也足够成熟,能够做出战略性的渠道决策。考虑在线价值不确定性引发的消费者失望厌恶,探讨了三种退货配置:不退货、同渠道退货和全渠道退货,并研究了失望厌恶对零售商最优定价、退货惩罚和盈利能力的影响。最重要的结论是失望厌恶对退货策略的影响受到不同产品退货率的影响。我们确定了零售商应选择全渠道退货策略的条件,其他主要发现表明,同一渠道策略下的最优定价应不低于其他两种策略,并且根据单位旅行成本的水平,最优定价在不同的失望厌恶间隔上是对称的,相关性相反。回报惩罚与失望厌恶保持在低位。只有当退货率相对较高时,零售商才会实施不退货政策。当收益率和失望厌恶均为中间值时,同渠道收益是最优策略。然而,只有当失望厌恶情绪较低时,零售商实施全渠道退货策略才有利可图,这支持了零售商对退货策略的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Omnichannel retailing return operations with consumer disappointment aversion

Omnichannel retailing return operations with consumer disappointment aversion

Product returns is a widespread phenomenon associated with online retailing, where both consumer behavior and retailers’ operation decisions are inextricable topics. To improve the returns experience, retailers have forayed into omnichannel return operations and consumers are sophisticated enough to make strategic channel decisions.

Taking into account consumer disappointment aversion triggered by value uncertainty online, three return configurations were explored: non-return, same-channel return and omnichannel return and the impacts of disappointment aversion on the retailer's optimal pricing, return penalty, and profitability are investigated. The most important conclusion is that the effect of disappointment aversion on return strategy is influenced by distinct product return rate. We identify conditions under which the retailer should choose omnichannel return strategy and the other key findings show that the optimal pricing under a same-channel strategy should be no lower than the other two strategies, and depending on the level of unit travel cost, the optimal pricing is symmetric on different disappointment aversion intervals and the correlations are opposite. The return penalty keeps down with disappointment aversion. The retailer will implement a non-return policy only when return rate is relatively high. When both the return rate and the disappointment aversion is intermediate, the same-channel return is the optimal strategy. However, it is only profitable for retailers to implement an omnichannel return strategy when disappointment aversion is low, which supports for the retailer's choice of return strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Operations Research Perspectives
Operations Research Perspectives Mathematics-Statistics and Probability
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
27 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信