{"title":"数字减影血管造影中静脉给药后碘丙胺和iopamidol的肾脏排泄。","authors":"W Mützel, M Langer, R Keysser","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After injection of iopromide or iopamidol into a central vein in 40 patients ages 57 +/- 14 years and 57 +/- 11 years, respectively, with normal renal function, iodine concentration and total iodine excretion were determined in pooled urine over 0 to 2 hours and 2 to 24 hours after injection. Iopromide excretion of 46.4 +/- 9.8% of the dose during the first 2 hours after injection was significantly (p less than 0.05) higher than that of iopamidol, which amounted to 41.4 +/- 10.5% of the dose. This is presumably due to the fact that iopromide has lower protein binding than iopamidol. Excretion of the two nonionic contrast media up to 2 hours after injection decreased constantly with increasing age. In the case of iopromide, a mean excretion of 55% of the dose in a patient 25 years old decreased to about 40% for a patient 90 years of age (p less than 0.05). The clinical relevance of the observed differences and correlations is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":75861,"journal":{"name":"Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. Erganzungsband","volume":"128 ","pages":"101-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Renal excretion of iopromide and iopamidol after intravenous administration in digital subtraction angiography.\",\"authors\":\"W Mützel, M Langer, R Keysser\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>After injection of iopromide or iopamidol into a central vein in 40 patients ages 57 +/- 14 years and 57 +/- 11 years, respectively, with normal renal function, iodine concentration and total iodine excretion were determined in pooled urine over 0 to 2 hours and 2 to 24 hours after injection. Iopromide excretion of 46.4 +/- 9.8% of the dose during the first 2 hours after injection was significantly (p less than 0.05) higher than that of iopamidol, which amounted to 41.4 +/- 10.5% of the dose. This is presumably due to the fact that iopromide has lower protein binding than iopamidol. Excretion of the two nonionic contrast media up to 2 hours after injection decreased constantly with increasing age. In the case of iopromide, a mean excretion of 55% of the dose in a patient 25 years old decreased to about 40% for a patient 90 years of age (p less than 0.05). The clinical relevance of the observed differences and correlations is discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. Erganzungsband\",\"volume\":\"128 \",\"pages\":\"101-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. Erganzungsband\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin. Erganzungsband","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Renal excretion of iopromide and iopamidol after intravenous administration in digital subtraction angiography.
After injection of iopromide or iopamidol into a central vein in 40 patients ages 57 +/- 14 years and 57 +/- 11 years, respectively, with normal renal function, iodine concentration and total iodine excretion were determined in pooled urine over 0 to 2 hours and 2 to 24 hours after injection. Iopromide excretion of 46.4 +/- 9.8% of the dose during the first 2 hours after injection was significantly (p less than 0.05) higher than that of iopamidol, which amounted to 41.4 +/- 10.5% of the dose. This is presumably due to the fact that iopromide has lower protein binding than iopamidol. Excretion of the two nonionic contrast media up to 2 hours after injection decreased constantly with increasing age. In the case of iopromide, a mean excretion of 55% of the dose in a patient 25 years old decreased to about 40% for a patient 90 years of age (p less than 0.05). The clinical relevance of the observed differences and correlations is discussed.