验证自我用药风险评估工具

Dinah Fuller , Roger Watson
{"title":"验证自我用药风险评估工具","authors":"Dinah Fuller ,&nbsp;Roger Watson","doi":"10.1016/j.cein.2004.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The purpose of the study was to refine and validate the self-medication risk assessment instrument for use as a reliable screening method to identify people who may have difficulty managing their medication safely. Specific objectives of the study were to demonstrate the reliability of the instrument.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>The study, using a correlational design, was designed to test inter- and intra-rater reliability of the instrument using a sample of 45 patients and 45 pairs of assessors. Each pair of assessors assessed the same patient on the same day and one of the original assessors returned to reassess the patient approximately one week later.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>The data collection took place in Acute medical and Community Rehabilitation settings and via Community Nursing, Pharmacy and Social Care staff in Hull and the East Riding of Yorkshire.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>45 patients and 45 pairs of assessors from Nursing, Pharmacy and Social Care backgrounds.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome measures</h3><p>Reliability of the instrument when used by different and same assessors and identification of key risk factors related to self-medication risk assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>The instrument has demonstrated strong inter- and intra-rater reliability for both outcome of assessment findings and risk category. Three key elements of the assessment criteria, mental state, attitude and knowledge about medications and severe visual impairment demonstrated a high level of </span>criterion validity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The self-medication assessment instrument shows promise in terms of reliability but further testing is required to demonstrate its validity and the possible weighting of individual items in the instrument.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87580,"journal":{"name":"Clinical effectiveness in nursing","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 78-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cein.2004.12.003","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating a self-medication risk assessment instrument\",\"authors\":\"Dinah Fuller ,&nbsp;Roger Watson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cein.2004.12.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The purpose of the study was to refine and validate the self-medication risk assessment instrument for use as a reliable screening method to identify people who may have difficulty managing their medication safely. Specific objectives of the study were to demonstrate the reliability of the instrument.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>The study, using a correlational design, was designed to test inter- and intra-rater reliability of the instrument using a sample of 45 patients and 45 pairs of assessors. Each pair of assessors assessed the same patient on the same day and one of the original assessors returned to reassess the patient approximately one week later.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>The data collection took place in Acute medical and Community Rehabilitation settings and via Community Nursing, Pharmacy and Social Care staff in Hull and the East Riding of Yorkshire.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>45 patients and 45 pairs of assessors from Nursing, Pharmacy and Social Care backgrounds.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome measures</h3><p>Reliability of the instrument when used by different and same assessors and identification of key risk factors related to self-medication risk assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>The instrument has demonstrated strong inter- and intra-rater reliability for both outcome of assessment findings and risk category. Three key elements of the assessment criteria, mental state, attitude and knowledge about medications and severe visual impairment demonstrated a high level of </span>criterion validity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The self-medication assessment instrument shows promise in terms of reliability but further testing is required to demonstrate its validity and the possible weighting of individual items in the instrument.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical effectiveness in nursing\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 78-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cein.2004.12.003\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical effectiveness in nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136190040500004X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical effectiveness in nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136190040500004X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

目的本研究的目的是完善和验证自我用药风险评估工具,作为一种可靠的筛选方法,以识别可能难以安全管理其用药的人群。研究的具体目标是证明仪器的可靠性。设计本研究采用相关设计,采用45名患者和45对评估者的样本,旨在测试该仪器在评估者之间和评估者内部的可靠性。每对评估人员在同一天对同一名患者进行评估,其中一名原评估人员大约一周后返回对患者进行重新评估。数据收集在急性医疗和社区康复环境中进行,并通过赫尔和约克郡东骑的社区护理、药房和社会护理工作人员进行。参与者包括45名患者和45对来自护理、药学和社会护理背景的评估人员。主要结果测量:由不同和相同的评估者使用该工具时的可靠性,以及与自我用药风险评估相关的关键风险因素的识别。结果该工具在评估结果和风险类别方面显示出很强的评级间和评级内可靠性。评估标准的三个关键要素,精神状态、态度和对药物和严重视力障碍的了解显示出高水平的标准效度。结论该自我药疗评估量表具有较高的信度,但仍需进一步验证其效度和量表中可能出现的单项权重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validating a self-medication risk assessment instrument

Objectives

The purpose of the study was to refine and validate the self-medication risk assessment instrument for use as a reliable screening method to identify people who may have difficulty managing their medication safely. Specific objectives of the study were to demonstrate the reliability of the instrument.

Design

The study, using a correlational design, was designed to test inter- and intra-rater reliability of the instrument using a sample of 45 patients and 45 pairs of assessors. Each pair of assessors assessed the same patient on the same day and one of the original assessors returned to reassess the patient approximately one week later.

Setting

The data collection took place in Acute medical and Community Rehabilitation settings and via Community Nursing, Pharmacy and Social Care staff in Hull and the East Riding of Yorkshire.

Participants

45 patients and 45 pairs of assessors from Nursing, Pharmacy and Social Care backgrounds.

Main Outcome measures

Reliability of the instrument when used by different and same assessors and identification of key risk factors related to self-medication risk assessment.

Results

The instrument has demonstrated strong inter- and intra-rater reliability for both outcome of assessment findings and risk category. Three key elements of the assessment criteria, mental state, attitude and knowledge about medications and severe visual impairment demonstrated a high level of criterion validity.

Conclusion

The self-medication assessment instrument shows promise in terms of reliability but further testing is required to demonstrate its validity and the possible weighting of individual items in the instrument.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信