脐带穿刺法脐静脉血非应激试验的再评价。

Fetal therapy Pub Date : 1989-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000263437
K Okamura, H Endoh, T Watanabe, S Tanigawara, M Iwamoto, J Murotsuki, A Yajima
{"title":"脐带穿刺法脐静脉血非应激试验的再评价。","authors":"K Okamura,&nbsp;H Endoh,&nbsp;T Watanabe,&nbsp;S Tanigawara,&nbsp;M Iwamoto,&nbsp;J Murotsuki,&nbsp;A Yajima","doi":"10.1159/000263437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fetal blood sampling by cordocentesis was performed in 85 cases of fetuses with either nonimmune hydrops fetalis, anomalies, intrauterine growth retardation, maternal immunological disorders, Rh incompatibility, hydronephrosis, polyhydramnios, maternal preeclampsia or fetal tumor. Fetal heart rate monitoring was also recorded before cordocentesis. We evaluated the usefulness of the nonstress test (NST) with regard to fetal hematologic gas profiles including pH, pO2 and pCO2. When the acceleration was classified into reactive and nonreactive group, pH and pO2 were significantly higher in the reactive group than in the nonreactive group. pCO2 was significantly lower in the former than the latter. However, the sensitivity and specificity of the reactive NST predicting fetal umbilical venous pO2 over 20 mm Hg was 79.7 and 68.7%, respectively. The false-positive rate of nonreactive NST predicting hypoxemia below 20 mm Hg pO2 was 44%. As a consequence, we cannot always rely on the NST, and should perform fetal blood sampling to assess fetal condition for further management.</p>","PeriodicalId":77713,"journal":{"name":"Fetal therapy","volume":"4 2-3","pages":"146-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000263437","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reevaluation of nonstress test by umbilical venous blood profile using cordocentesis.\",\"authors\":\"K Okamura,&nbsp;H Endoh,&nbsp;T Watanabe,&nbsp;S Tanigawara,&nbsp;M Iwamoto,&nbsp;J Murotsuki,&nbsp;A Yajima\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000263437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Fetal blood sampling by cordocentesis was performed in 85 cases of fetuses with either nonimmune hydrops fetalis, anomalies, intrauterine growth retardation, maternal immunological disorders, Rh incompatibility, hydronephrosis, polyhydramnios, maternal preeclampsia or fetal tumor. Fetal heart rate monitoring was also recorded before cordocentesis. We evaluated the usefulness of the nonstress test (NST) with regard to fetal hematologic gas profiles including pH, pO2 and pCO2. When the acceleration was classified into reactive and nonreactive group, pH and pO2 were significantly higher in the reactive group than in the nonreactive group. pCO2 was significantly lower in the former than the latter. However, the sensitivity and specificity of the reactive NST predicting fetal umbilical venous pO2 over 20 mm Hg was 79.7 and 68.7%, respectively. The false-positive rate of nonreactive NST predicting hypoxemia below 20 mm Hg pO2 was 44%. As a consequence, we cannot always rely on the NST, and should perform fetal blood sampling to assess fetal condition for further management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fetal therapy\",\"volume\":\"4 2-3\",\"pages\":\"146-51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000263437\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fetal therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000263437\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fetal therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000263437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

对非免疫性积水、畸形、宫内发育迟缓、母体免疫障碍、Rh不相容、肾积水、羊水过多、母体子痫前期或胎儿肿瘤的85例胎儿进行脐带穿刺采血。脐带穿刺前记录胎儿心率监测。我们评估了非应激测试(NST)对胎儿血液学气体谱的有用性,包括pH, pO2和pCO2。将加速分为反应性组和非反应性组时,反应性组的pH和pO2明显高于非反应性组。前者的二氧化碳分压显著低于后者。然而,反应性NST预测胎儿脐静脉pO2≥20 mm Hg的敏感性和特异性分别为79.7和68.7%。非反应性NST预测20mmhg pO2以下低氧血症的假阳性率为44%。因此,我们不能总是依赖于NST,而应该进行胎儿血液取样来评估胎儿状况,以便进一步处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reevaluation of nonstress test by umbilical venous blood profile using cordocentesis.

Fetal blood sampling by cordocentesis was performed in 85 cases of fetuses with either nonimmune hydrops fetalis, anomalies, intrauterine growth retardation, maternal immunological disorders, Rh incompatibility, hydronephrosis, polyhydramnios, maternal preeclampsia or fetal tumor. Fetal heart rate monitoring was also recorded before cordocentesis. We evaluated the usefulness of the nonstress test (NST) with regard to fetal hematologic gas profiles including pH, pO2 and pCO2. When the acceleration was classified into reactive and nonreactive group, pH and pO2 were significantly higher in the reactive group than in the nonreactive group. pCO2 was significantly lower in the former than the latter. However, the sensitivity and specificity of the reactive NST predicting fetal umbilical venous pO2 over 20 mm Hg was 79.7 and 68.7%, respectively. The false-positive rate of nonreactive NST predicting hypoxemia below 20 mm Hg pO2 was 44%. As a consequence, we cannot always rely on the NST, and should perform fetal blood sampling to assess fetal condition for further management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信