残疾术语:在学术写作中使用“残疾”、“紊乱”和“疾病”。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-16 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2023.2280780
Jennifer Grandits, Alyssa Davis, Bradley Rikard, Angela Vatrano, Hannah Martin, Mary Anne Taylor
{"title":"残疾术语:在学术写作中使用“残疾”、“紊乱”和“疾病”。","authors":"Jennifer Grandits, Alyssa Davis, Bradley Rikard, Angela Vatrano, Hannah Martin, Mary Anne Taylor","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2023.2280780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The ways in which words are used to describe and discuss people with disabilities has long been an area of social concern. Previous research has demonstrated that language can overtly and subtly influence cognitions and perceptions of individuals, but there is less research on how language relates to perceptions of individuals with disabilities.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A content analysis of 236 peer-reviewed articles was performed to explore differences in the frequency of the use of \"disability,\" \"disorder,\" and \"illness\" in academic articles related to eight common conditions: deafness, blindness, multiple sclerosis, quadriplegia, anxiety, depression, schizophrenia, and addiction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated that there were differences in how disability language was used by academic writers. Specifically, \"disability\" appeared in the writing more frequently in articles related to physical disabilities, \"disorder\" appeared most frequently in articles related to anxiety and depression, and \"illness\" appeared most frequently in articles related to schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This observed difference in frequency use could reflect differences in the context and meaning of the use of these conditions. Suggestions for future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disability terminology: the use of \\\"disability,\\\" \\\"disorder,\\\" and \\\"illness\\\" in academic writing.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Grandits, Alyssa Davis, Bradley Rikard, Angela Vatrano, Hannah Martin, Mary Anne Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638288.2023.2280780\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The ways in which words are used to describe and discuss people with disabilities has long been an area of social concern. Previous research has demonstrated that language can overtly and subtly influence cognitions and perceptions of individuals, but there is less research on how language relates to perceptions of individuals with disabilities.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A content analysis of 236 peer-reviewed articles was performed to explore differences in the frequency of the use of \\\"disability,\\\" \\\"disorder,\\\" and \\\"illness\\\" in academic articles related to eight common conditions: deafness, blindness, multiple sclerosis, quadriplegia, anxiety, depression, schizophrenia, and addiction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated that there were differences in how disability language was used by academic writers. Specifically, \\\"disability\\\" appeared in the writing more frequently in articles related to physical disabilities, \\\"disorder\\\" appeared most frequently in articles related to anxiety and depression, and \\\"illness\\\" appeared most frequently in articles related to schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This observed difference in frequency use could reflect differences in the context and meaning of the use of these conditions. Suggestions for future research are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2023.2280780\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2023.2280780","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:长期以来,词汇用来描述和讨论残疾人一直是社会关注的一个领域。先前的研究表明,语言可以明显而微妙地影响个体的认知和感知,但关于语言与残疾人感知之间的关系的研究较少。材料和方法:对236篇同行评议的文章进行内容分析,以探索与八种常见疾病相关的学术文章中“残疾”、“紊乱”和“疾病”使用频率的差异:耳聋、失明、多发性硬化症、四肢瘫痪、焦虑、抑郁、精神分裂症和成瘾。结果:研究结果表明,学术作家在残疾语言的使用上存在差异。具体来说,“残疾”在与身体残疾相关的文章中出现的频率更高,“紊乱”在与焦虑和抑郁相关的文章中出现的频率最高,“疾病”在与精神分裂症相关的文章中出现的频率最高。结论:观察到的使用频率的差异可能反映了这些条件使用的背景和意义的差异。最后对今后的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disability terminology: the use of "disability," "disorder," and "illness" in academic writing.

Purpose: The ways in which words are used to describe and discuss people with disabilities has long been an area of social concern. Previous research has demonstrated that language can overtly and subtly influence cognitions and perceptions of individuals, but there is less research on how language relates to perceptions of individuals with disabilities.

Materials and methods: A content analysis of 236 peer-reviewed articles was performed to explore differences in the frequency of the use of "disability," "disorder," and "illness" in academic articles related to eight common conditions: deafness, blindness, multiple sclerosis, quadriplegia, anxiety, depression, schizophrenia, and addiction.

Results: Results indicated that there were differences in how disability language was used by academic writers. Specifically, "disability" appeared in the writing more frequently in articles related to physical disabilities, "disorder" appeared most frequently in articles related to anxiety and depression, and "illness" appeared most frequently in articles related to schizophrenia.

Conclusions: This observed difference in frequency use could reflect differences in the context and meaning of the use of these conditions. Suggestions for future research are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信