{"title":"RT-PCR与胸部CT在门诊临床疑似COVID-19患者中的诊断价值","authors":"Elif TÜKENMEZ TİGEN, Buket ERTURK SENGEL, Canan CİMSİT, Hande PERK GURUN, Çiğdem APAYDIN KAYA, Volkan KORTEN","doi":"10.5472/marumj.1379916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate the diagnostic performance between chest computed tomography (CT) and reverse transcription-polymerase
 chain reaction (RT-PCR) in outpatients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
 Patients and Methods: Between March and June 2020, a total of 812 patients with clinically suspected COVID-19 who underwent both
 chest CT and initial-single RT-PCR on admission to outpatient units were retrospectively enrolled. CT severity-score (CT-SS) was
 calculated and data were matched with PCR results.
 Results: Of 812 patients, 54% (439/812) had positive RT-PCR results, and 47% (425/812) had a positive chest CT scan. With RT-PCR
 results as reference, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy of chest CT in defining COVID-19 infection were 60%, (95% CI 56-65%,
 265/439 patients), 57% (95% CI 52-62%, 213/373), 59% (95% CI 55-62%, 478/812), respectively. Three hundred eighty-seven (47%)
 patients had no CT findings, 380/812 (46.8%) had mild, 45/812 (5.5%) had moderate, and no patients in the severe group
 Conclusion: Chest CT did not show high sensitivity for the diagnosis of COVID-19 for outpatients. We suggest RT-PCR should be
 the primary diagnostic tool. Chest CT might be considered if there is a strong clinical suspicion with repeatedly negative RT-PCR test
 results, ensuring infection prevention and control measures can be preserved.","PeriodicalId":43341,"journal":{"name":"Marmara Medical Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic performance between RT-PCR and chest CT in outpatients with clinically suspected COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Elif TÜKENMEZ TİGEN, Buket ERTURK SENGEL, Canan CİMSİT, Hande PERK GURUN, Çiğdem APAYDIN KAYA, Volkan KORTEN\",\"doi\":\"10.5472/marumj.1379916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To investigate the diagnostic performance between chest computed tomography (CT) and reverse transcription-polymerase
 chain reaction (RT-PCR) in outpatients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
 Patients and Methods: Between March and June 2020, a total of 812 patients with clinically suspected COVID-19 who underwent both
 chest CT and initial-single RT-PCR on admission to outpatient units were retrospectively enrolled. CT severity-score (CT-SS) was
 calculated and data were matched with PCR results.
 Results: Of 812 patients, 54% (439/812) had positive RT-PCR results, and 47% (425/812) had a positive chest CT scan. With RT-PCR
 results as reference, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy of chest CT in defining COVID-19 infection were 60%, (95% CI 56-65%,
 265/439 patients), 57% (95% CI 52-62%, 213/373), 59% (95% CI 55-62%, 478/812), respectively. Three hundred eighty-seven (47%)
 patients had no CT findings, 380/812 (46.8%) had mild, 45/812 (5.5%) had moderate, and no patients in the severe group
 Conclusion: Chest CT did not show high sensitivity for the diagnosis of COVID-19 for outpatients. We suggest RT-PCR should be
 the primary diagnostic tool. Chest CT might be considered if there is a strong clinical suspicion with repeatedly negative RT-PCR test
 results, ensuring infection prevention and control measures can be preserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marmara Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marmara Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.1379916\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marmara Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.1379916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)与逆转录聚合酶(rase)的诊断价值;链式反应(RT-PCR)在门诊疑似冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)中的应用。
患者和方法:在2020年3月至6月期间,共有812例临床疑似COVID-19患者接受了
回顾性纳入门诊入院时的胸部CT和初始单次RT-PCR。CT严重程度评分(CT- ss)为
计算和数据与PCR结果吻合。
结果:812例患者中,54%(439/812)的RT-PCR结果呈阳性,47%(425/812)的胸部CT扫描呈阳性。用rt - pcr # x0D;结果作为参考,胸部CT诊断COVID-19感染的敏感性、特异性、准确性为60%,(95% CI 56 ~ 65%,
265/439例患者),57% (95% CI 52-62%, 213/373), 59% (95% CI 55-62%, 478/812)。387 (47%)
未见CT表现,轻度380/812例(46.8%),中度45/812例(5.5%),重度组无患者;结论:胸部CT对门诊患者COVID-19的诊断敏感性不高。我们建议RT-PCR应该
主诊断工具。如果临床怀疑强烈且反复出现RT-PCR阴性,可考虑胸部CT检查
结果:确保感染防控措施得以保留。
Diagnostic performance between RT-PCR and chest CT in outpatients with clinically suspected COVID-19
Objective: To investigate the diagnostic performance between chest computed tomography (CT) and reverse transcription-polymerase
chain reaction (RT-PCR) in outpatients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Patients and Methods: Between March and June 2020, a total of 812 patients with clinically suspected COVID-19 who underwent both
chest CT and initial-single RT-PCR on admission to outpatient units were retrospectively enrolled. CT severity-score (CT-SS) was
calculated and data were matched with PCR results.
Results: Of 812 patients, 54% (439/812) had positive RT-PCR results, and 47% (425/812) had a positive chest CT scan. With RT-PCR
results as reference, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy of chest CT in defining COVID-19 infection were 60%, (95% CI 56-65%,
265/439 patients), 57% (95% CI 52-62%, 213/373), 59% (95% CI 55-62%, 478/812), respectively. Three hundred eighty-seven (47%)
patients had no CT findings, 380/812 (46.8%) had mild, 45/812 (5.5%) had moderate, and no patients in the severe group
Conclusion: Chest CT did not show high sensitivity for the diagnosis of COVID-19 for outpatients. We suggest RT-PCR should be
the primary diagnostic tool. Chest CT might be considered if there is a strong clinical suspicion with repeatedly negative RT-PCR test
results, ensuring infection prevention and control measures can be preserved.
期刊介绍:
Marmara Medical Journal, Marmara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi tarafından yılda üç kere yayımlanan multidisipliner bir dergidir. Bu dergide tıbbın tüm alanlarına ait orijinal araştırma makaleleri, olgu sunumları ve derlemeler İngilizce veya Türkçe olarak yer alır.