秘密生活

IF 0.4 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
Simon Varga
{"title":"秘密生活","authors":"Simon Varga","doi":"10.1163/1568525x-bja10186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article focusses on an examination of Epicurus’ understanding of self-sufficiency, which is only marginally addressed within research. But many traditions suggest paying more attention to the concept of self-sufficiency. The scarcity of available sources must be regarded as problematic; therefore here an attempt is made to reconstruct this concept. The thesis is that Epicurus discusses human striving for self-sufficiency in two different ways and thus more comprehensively than previously assumed: extrinsic (physical or external autarky) and intrinsic (psychic or internal autarky). As so often, Epicurus is not talking about a theory, but about an immediate practice: human striving for self-sufficiency, an indispensable prerequisite for ataraxia, is made possible by living (hiddenly) in the garden in friendship—far from the politics of the polis. These connections lead to the conclusion that the individual self-sufficiency of the human being does not aim at ‘not needing anybody else anymore’, but requires a form of community that should allow the human being the greatest possible freedom within the framework of the Epicurean teachings.","PeriodicalId":46134,"journal":{"name":"MNEMOSYNE","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leben im Verborgenen\",\"authors\":\"Simon Varga\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/1568525x-bja10186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article focusses on an examination of Epicurus’ understanding of self-sufficiency, which is only marginally addressed within research. But many traditions suggest paying more attention to the concept of self-sufficiency. The scarcity of available sources must be regarded as problematic; therefore here an attempt is made to reconstruct this concept. The thesis is that Epicurus discusses human striving for self-sufficiency in two different ways and thus more comprehensively than previously assumed: extrinsic (physical or external autarky) and intrinsic (psychic or internal autarky). As so often, Epicurus is not talking about a theory, but about an immediate practice: human striving for self-sufficiency, an indispensable prerequisite for ataraxia, is made possible by living (hiddenly) in the garden in friendship—far from the politics of the polis. These connections lead to the conclusion that the individual self-sufficiency of the human being does not aim at ‘not needing anybody else anymore’, but requires a form of community that should allow the human being the greatest possible freedom within the framework of the Epicurean teachings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MNEMOSYNE\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MNEMOSYNE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525x-bja10186\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MNEMOSYNE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525x-bja10186","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文重点考察伊壁鸠鲁对自给自足的理解,这在研究中只得到了很少的关注。但许多传统建议我们更多地关注自给自足的概念。可利用资源的缺乏必须被视为一个问题;因此,本文试图重构这一概念。伊壁鸠鲁以两种不同的方式讨论了人类对自给自足的追求,因此比之前假设的更全面:外在的(身体或外部的自给自足)和内在的(精神或内部的自给自足)。一如往常,伊壁鸠鲁不是在谈论一种理论,而是在谈论一种直接的实践:人类为自给自足而奋斗,这是精神状态不可或缺的先决条件,这是通过(隐蔽地)生活在友谊的花园中——远离城邦的政治——而成为可能的。这些联系导致了这样的结论:人类的个人自给自足并不以“不再需要任何人”为目标,而是需要一种形式的社区,这种社区应该允许人类在伊壁鸠鲁教义的框架内获得最大的自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leben im Verborgenen
Abstract This article focusses on an examination of Epicurus’ understanding of self-sufficiency, which is only marginally addressed within research. But many traditions suggest paying more attention to the concept of self-sufficiency. The scarcity of available sources must be regarded as problematic; therefore here an attempt is made to reconstruct this concept. The thesis is that Epicurus discusses human striving for self-sufficiency in two different ways and thus more comprehensively than previously assumed: extrinsic (physical or external autarky) and intrinsic (psychic or internal autarky). As so often, Epicurus is not talking about a theory, but about an immediate practice: human striving for self-sufficiency, an indispensable prerequisite for ataraxia, is made possible by living (hiddenly) in the garden in friendship—far from the politics of the polis. These connections lead to the conclusion that the individual self-sufficiency of the human being does not aim at ‘not needing anybody else anymore’, but requires a form of community that should allow the human being the greatest possible freedom within the framework of the Epicurean teachings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MNEMOSYNE
MNEMOSYNE CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Since its first appearance as a journal of textual criticism in 1852, Mnemosyne has secured a position as one of the leading journals in its field worldwide. Its reputation is built on the Dutch academic tradition, famous for its rigour and thoroughness. It attracts contributions from all over the world, with the result that Mnemosyne is distinctive for a combination of scholarly approaches from both sides of the Atlantic and the Equator. Its presence in libraries around the globe is a sign of its continued reputation as an invaluable resource for scholarship in Classical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信