开放大学运动:大型大学的比较案例研究

Burcu ERTÜRK KILIÇ, Fatma Nevra SEGGİE, Zeynep KIZILTEPE, Zeynep ÖZDOĞAN GACAL
{"title":"开放大学运动:大型大学的比较案例研究","authors":"Burcu ERTÜRK KILIÇ, Fatma Nevra SEGGİE, Zeynep KIZILTEPE, Zeynep ÖZDOĞAN GACAL","doi":"10.32329/uad.1243745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increase in open and distance education and the rise of open university movement in the field of higher education have resulted in the establishment of open mega universities in different parts of the world with populations of more than 100,000 students each. Despite the benefits of access and low costs, the main criticism of this type of institution has been about quality assurance. The aim of this paper is 1) to compare and contrast three open mega universities namely Anadolu University in Turkey, Indira Gandhi National Open University in India, and Open University in Britain, in terms of their missions, visions, mottos, learning environments, entrance requirements, and quality assurance policies as they appeared on their official websites; and 2) to highlight their alignment with the open university movement. This qualitative study employs a comparative case study approach, and analyses data with the constant comparative method. Major findings suggested that these universities seemed to establish their access strategies and lower their costs through massification. They appeared to be concerned about quality assurance policies on their websites mainly to attract student masses around the world. The question we raise is the extent to which the balance between quality and quantity is reached in actual educational settings.","PeriodicalId":484648,"journal":{"name":"Üniversite araştırmaları dergisi","volume":"157 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Open University Movement: A Comparative Case Study of Mega Universities\",\"authors\":\"Burcu ERTÜRK KILIÇ, Fatma Nevra SEGGİE, Zeynep KIZILTEPE, Zeynep ÖZDOĞAN GACAL\",\"doi\":\"10.32329/uad.1243745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The increase in open and distance education and the rise of open university movement in the field of higher education have resulted in the establishment of open mega universities in different parts of the world with populations of more than 100,000 students each. Despite the benefits of access and low costs, the main criticism of this type of institution has been about quality assurance. The aim of this paper is 1) to compare and contrast three open mega universities namely Anadolu University in Turkey, Indira Gandhi National Open University in India, and Open University in Britain, in terms of their missions, visions, mottos, learning environments, entrance requirements, and quality assurance policies as they appeared on their official websites; and 2) to highlight their alignment with the open university movement. This qualitative study employs a comparative case study approach, and analyses data with the constant comparative method. Major findings suggested that these universities seemed to establish their access strategies and lower their costs through massification. They appeared to be concerned about quality assurance policies on their websites mainly to attract student masses around the world. The question we raise is the extent to which the balance between quality and quantity is reached in actual educational settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":484648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Üniversite araştırmaları dergisi\",\"volume\":\"157 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Üniversite araştırmaları dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32329/uad.1243745\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Üniversite araştırmaları dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32329/uad.1243745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着远程开放教育的兴起和高等教育领域开放大学运动的兴起,世界各地都建立了规模超过10万的大型开放大学。尽管有获取和低成本的好处,但对这类机构的主要批评是关于质量保证的。本文的目的是1)比较和对比三所大型开放大学,即土耳其的阿纳多卢大学、印度的英迪拉甘地国立开放大学和英国的开放大学,在他们的使命、愿景、座右铭、学习环境、入学要求和质量保证政策方面,正如他们在官方网站上出现的那样;2)强调他们与开放大学运动的一致性。本定性研究采用比较案例研究方法,并采用恒常比较方法分析数据。主要研究结果表明,这些大学似乎建立了自己的准入策略,并通过大众化降低了成本。他们似乎对其网站上的质量保证政策感到担忧,这些政策主要是为了吸引世界各地的学生群体。我们提出的问题是,在实际的教育环境中,质量和数量之间的平衡达到了何种程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Open University Movement: A Comparative Case Study of Mega Universities
The increase in open and distance education and the rise of open university movement in the field of higher education have resulted in the establishment of open mega universities in different parts of the world with populations of more than 100,000 students each. Despite the benefits of access and low costs, the main criticism of this type of institution has been about quality assurance. The aim of this paper is 1) to compare and contrast three open mega universities namely Anadolu University in Turkey, Indira Gandhi National Open University in India, and Open University in Britain, in terms of their missions, visions, mottos, learning environments, entrance requirements, and quality assurance policies as they appeared on their official websites; and 2) to highlight their alignment with the open university movement. This qualitative study employs a comparative case study approach, and analyses data with the constant comparative method. Major findings suggested that these universities seemed to establish their access strategies and lower their costs through massification. They appeared to be concerned about quality assurance policies on their websites mainly to attract student masses around the world. The question we raise is the extent to which the balance between quality and quantity is reached in actual educational settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信