{"title":"妥协立场:残疾婴儿的医疗。","authors":"M K Chalnick","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this paper is to trace the evolution of the \"Baby Doe\" policy, focusing on litigation and legislation. The policy is examined for its strengths and weaknesses, and areas for continuing study are identified and explored. In addition, the participation of nurses as members of Infant Care Review Committees and the Committees' role as potential policy makers are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":76125,"journal":{"name":"Maternal-child nursing journal","volume":"18 2","pages":"167-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compromising positions: medical treatment for disabled infants.\",\"authors\":\"M K Chalnick\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this paper is to trace the evolution of the \\\"Baby Doe\\\" policy, focusing on litigation and legislation. The policy is examined for its strengths and weaknesses, and areas for continuing study are identified and explored. In addition, the participation of nurses as members of Infant Care Review Committees and the Committees' role as potential policy makers are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maternal-child nursing journal\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"167-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maternal-child nursing journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal-child nursing journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Compromising positions: medical treatment for disabled infants.
The purpose of this paper is to trace the evolution of the "Baby Doe" policy, focusing on litigation and legislation. The policy is examined for its strengths and weaknesses, and areas for continuing study are identified and explored. In addition, the participation of nurses as members of Infant Care Review Committees and the Committees' role as potential policy makers are discussed.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
