在中学阶段英语教学中使用替代评估技术的探索

IF 2.7 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Nazia Shahzadi, Asma Malik, Asghar Abbas
{"title":"在中学阶段英语教学中使用替代评估技术的探索","authors":"Nazia Shahzadi, Asma Malik, Asghar Abbas","doi":"10.61506/02.00024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of the study was to explore dominant assessment techniques, secondary school teachers use on regular basis in their English language classes. Quantitative cum Qualitative research design was used. 25 English language public secondary school teachers of Tehsil Gujrat (13 male and 12 female SSTs) were selected through random sampling technique. They were assigned to use alternative assessment techniques as per model developed by the researchers. They were handed over checklist to keep record of assessment techniques. At the end of term, the record of assessment techniques of all the teachers was collected with the checklist. Frequencies and percentages of checklist of all the teachers were calculated. Record of assessment techniques were also observed and analyzed thoroughly for qualitative results. The outcome of the study informed that in tehsil Gujrat, majority of the English language teachers are reluctant to use alternative assessment techniques in their classes. The researchers recommend that further research may be conducted to generalize the results of the study to the entire contents of the English language at secondary level. There may be changes in the annual board examination system to make it compatible with the modern assessment techniques.","PeriodicalId":46316,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy Research in Tourism Leisure and Events","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration of the Use of Alternative Assessment Techniques in Teaching of English at Secondary Level\",\"authors\":\"Nazia Shahzadi, Asma Malik, Asghar Abbas\",\"doi\":\"10.61506/02.00024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main objective of the study was to explore dominant assessment techniques, secondary school teachers use on regular basis in their English language classes. Quantitative cum Qualitative research design was used. 25 English language public secondary school teachers of Tehsil Gujrat (13 male and 12 female SSTs) were selected through random sampling technique. They were assigned to use alternative assessment techniques as per model developed by the researchers. They were handed over checklist to keep record of assessment techniques. At the end of term, the record of assessment techniques of all the teachers was collected with the checklist. Frequencies and percentages of checklist of all the teachers were calculated. Record of assessment techniques were also observed and analyzed thoroughly for qualitative results. The outcome of the study informed that in tehsil Gujrat, majority of the English language teachers are reluctant to use alternative assessment techniques in their classes. The researchers recommend that further research may be conducted to generalize the results of the study to the entire contents of the English language at secondary level. There may be changes in the annual board examination system to make it compatible with the modern assessment techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Policy Research in Tourism Leisure and Events\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Policy Research in Tourism Leisure and Events\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy Research in Tourism Leisure and Events","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61506/02.00024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的主要目的是探讨中学教师在英语课堂上经常使用的主要评估方法。采用定量和定性研究设计。采用随机抽样方法,选取特西尔古吉拉特邦公立英语中学教师25名,其中男教师13名,女教师12名。根据研究人员开发的模型,他们被分配使用不同的评估技术。给他们一张清单,记录评估技术。学期结束时,收集所有教师的评估技巧记录和检查表。计算所有教师的检查表频率和百分比。对评价技术的记录也进行了彻底的观察和定性分析。研究结果表明,在特西尔古吉拉特邦,大多数英语教师不愿意在课堂上使用替代评估技术。研究人员建议,可以进行进一步的研究,将研究结果推广到中学英语语言的全部内容。每年的董事会考试制度可能会有所改变,使其与现代评估技术相适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploration of the Use of Alternative Assessment Techniques in Teaching of English at Secondary Level
The main objective of the study was to explore dominant assessment techniques, secondary school teachers use on regular basis in their English language classes. Quantitative cum Qualitative research design was used. 25 English language public secondary school teachers of Tehsil Gujrat (13 male and 12 female SSTs) were selected through random sampling technique. They were assigned to use alternative assessment techniques as per model developed by the researchers. They were handed over checklist to keep record of assessment techniques. At the end of term, the record of assessment techniques of all the teachers was collected with the checklist. Frequencies and percentages of checklist of all the teachers were calculated. Record of assessment techniques were also observed and analyzed thoroughly for qualitative results. The outcome of the study informed that in tehsil Gujrat, majority of the English language teachers are reluctant to use alternative assessment techniques in their classes. The researchers recommend that further research may be conducted to generalize the results of the study to the entire contents of the English language at secondary level. There may be changes in the annual board examination system to make it compatible with the modern assessment techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Policy Research in Tourism Leisure and Events
Journal of Policy Research in Tourism Leisure and Events HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
19.40%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure & Events provides a unique forum for critical discussion of public policy debates relating to the fields of tourism, leisure and events. This encompasses the economic, social, cultural, political and environmental dimensions of official intervention. In addition to high quality theoretical and empirical papers, the journal publishes contributions examining the value of contrasting methodologies, or advocacy of novel methods. Inter- and multi-disciplinary submissions are particularly welcome. In order to foster debate and extend the scope of discussion, it publishes shorter carefully argued position statements on specific, topical interventions in the Contemporary Policy Debates section. In addition, the journal’s novel Dialogues section involves ‘point/counter-point’ debates between contributors on a range of policy-related or policy research-related topics. These may interrogate key concepts from different cultural, theoretical or spatial perspectives, or discuss potential responses to a range of practical challenges involved in undertaking policy-related research in the fields of tourism, leisure and events. With a swiftly growing academic reputation, the journal is ‘B’ rated by the Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC). It has received citations from a number of senior practitioners and influential bodies, including the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信