从实体和程序法律规范的角度分析霍贾利种族灭绝:缺席诉讼和管辖权问题

Siyavush Bagırov
{"title":"从实体和程序法律规范的角度分析霍贾利种族灭绝:缺席诉讼和管辖权问题","authors":"Siyavush Bagırov","doi":"10.36695/2219-5521.2.2023.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is the first study that addresses both the material and procedural grounds of whether the Khojaly Tribunal can be created or not in the Republic of Azerbaijan. The first goal of the study is to analyze the legal bases of the Khojaly Tribunal, and to compare national legislation with international standards during the analysis of these bases. So, in the first part of the article, the main information about the events of Khojaly is reflected. Our main reason for adding this part to the article is to draw attention to the necessity of the Khojaly Case trial and the fact that there are sufficient grounds for it. Also, the practices of the Bangladesh and Lebanese Tribunals were studied, which were reflected in the Azerbaijani legal literature for the first time. In the last part, we have allocated space to the problems of the Criminal Procedure Code of Azerbaijan, as well as the interpretation of articles 53 and 311 of practice","PeriodicalId":500143,"journal":{"name":"Časopis Kiïvsʹkogo unìversitetu prava","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALYSIS OF THE KHOJALY GENOCIDE FROM THE PRISM OF SUBSTANTIVE AND PROCEDURAL LEGAL NORMS: PROCEEDINGS IN ABSENTIA AND JURISDICTION PROBLEM\",\"authors\":\"Siyavush Bagırov\",\"doi\":\"10.36695/2219-5521.2.2023.51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is the first study that addresses both the material and procedural grounds of whether the Khojaly Tribunal can be created or not in the Republic of Azerbaijan. The first goal of the study is to analyze the legal bases of the Khojaly Tribunal, and to compare national legislation with international standards during the analysis of these bases. So, in the first part of the article, the main information about the events of Khojaly is reflected. Our main reason for adding this part to the article is to draw attention to the necessity of the Khojaly Case trial and the fact that there are sufficient grounds for it. Also, the practices of the Bangladesh and Lebanese Tribunals were studied, which were reflected in the Azerbaijani legal literature for the first time. In the last part, we have allocated space to the problems of the Criminal Procedure Code of Azerbaijan, as well as the interpretation of articles 53 and 311 of practice\",\"PeriodicalId\":500143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Časopis Kiïvsʹkogo unìversitetu prava\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Časopis Kiïvsʹkogo unìversitetu prava\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36695/2219-5521.2.2023.51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Časopis Kiïvsʹkogo unìversitetu prava","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36695/2219-5521.2.2023.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章是第一篇探讨是否可以在阿塞拜疆共和国设立霍贾利法庭的物质和程序依据的研究报告。这项研究的第一个目标是分析霍贾里法庭的法律依据,并在分析这些依据时将国家立法与国际标准进行比较。因此,在文章的第一部分中,反映了有关Khojaly事件的主要信息。我们在文章中增加这一部分的主要原因是提请注意Khojaly案审判的必要性以及有充分理由进行审判的事实。此外,还研究了孟加拉国和黎巴嫩法庭的做法,这些做法第一次反映在阿塞拜疆的法律文献中。在最后一部分中,我们为《阿塞拜疆刑事诉讼法》的问题以及对惯例第53条和第311条的解释留出了篇幅
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALYSIS OF THE KHOJALY GENOCIDE FROM THE PRISM OF SUBSTANTIVE AND PROCEDURAL LEGAL NORMS: PROCEEDINGS IN ABSENTIA AND JURISDICTION PROBLEM
This article is the first study that addresses both the material and procedural grounds of whether the Khojaly Tribunal can be created or not in the Republic of Azerbaijan. The first goal of the study is to analyze the legal bases of the Khojaly Tribunal, and to compare national legislation with international standards during the analysis of these bases. So, in the first part of the article, the main information about the events of Khojaly is reflected. Our main reason for adding this part to the article is to draw attention to the necessity of the Khojaly Case trial and the fact that there are sufficient grounds for it. Also, the practices of the Bangladesh and Lebanese Tribunals were studied, which were reflected in the Azerbaijani legal literature for the first time. In the last part, we have allocated space to the problems of the Criminal Procedure Code of Azerbaijan, as well as the interpretation of articles 53 and 311 of practice
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信