传统和NSM钢筋细长砌体墙在轴向和面外荷载作用下的响应

Adrien Sparling, Dan Palermo
{"title":"传统和NSM钢筋细长砌体墙在轴向和面外荷载作用下的响应","authors":"Adrien Sparling, Dan Palermo","doi":"10.1061/jsendh.steng-11364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The response of four slender reinforced masonry walls to combined axial and out-of-plane loading is presented herein. The testing series compares the response of walls with conventionally embedded steel reinforcing bars to those with near-surface-mounted (NSM) steel reinforcement. Each wall was constructed from 190 mm wide hollow concrete masonry units to a length of 1,200 mm and a height of 7,800 mm, with a gross reinforcement ratio of 0.26%. Each wall was simply supported and loaded cyclically in the out-of-plane direction within the elastic response range (up to 90% of the nominal yield strain of the reinforcing bars) with the applied axial loading ranging from 0 to 250 kN. The moment resistance of each wall increased with increasing applied axial load; however, the out-of-plane load resistance of the conventionally reinforced walls decreased due to secondary moment effects. The stiffer walls with NSM reinforcement exhibited increasing out-of-plane load resistance due to the increasing moment resistance and to the lower displacement of the system which reduced secondary moment effects. The final loading cycle of each wall displaced the walls to at least twice the yield displacement while maintaining an imposed axial load of 60 kN (for both conventionally reinforced walls and one of the walls with NSM reinforcement) or 120 kN (for one of the walls with NSM reinforcement). Comparing the response of the walls in their final loading cycles, the conventionally reinforced and NSM reinforced walls had similar maximum moment resistance; however, the average out-of-plane load resistance at the yield point of the walls with NSM reinforcement was 180% of the conventionally reinforced walls. This experimental series represents the first full-scale tests of very slender concrete block masonry walls reinforced with NSM steel bars.","PeriodicalId":17068,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Structural Engineering-asce","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response of Full-Scale Slender Masonry Walls with Conventional and NSM Steel Reinforcement Subjected to Axial and Out-of-Plane Loads\",\"authors\":\"Adrien Sparling, Dan Palermo\",\"doi\":\"10.1061/jsendh.steng-11364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The response of four slender reinforced masonry walls to combined axial and out-of-plane loading is presented herein. The testing series compares the response of walls with conventionally embedded steel reinforcing bars to those with near-surface-mounted (NSM) steel reinforcement. Each wall was constructed from 190 mm wide hollow concrete masonry units to a length of 1,200 mm and a height of 7,800 mm, with a gross reinforcement ratio of 0.26%. Each wall was simply supported and loaded cyclically in the out-of-plane direction within the elastic response range (up to 90% of the nominal yield strain of the reinforcing bars) with the applied axial loading ranging from 0 to 250 kN. The moment resistance of each wall increased with increasing applied axial load; however, the out-of-plane load resistance of the conventionally reinforced walls decreased due to secondary moment effects. The stiffer walls with NSM reinforcement exhibited increasing out-of-plane load resistance due to the increasing moment resistance and to the lower displacement of the system which reduced secondary moment effects. The final loading cycle of each wall displaced the walls to at least twice the yield displacement while maintaining an imposed axial load of 60 kN (for both conventionally reinforced walls and one of the walls with NSM reinforcement) or 120 kN (for one of the walls with NSM reinforcement). Comparing the response of the walls in their final loading cycles, the conventionally reinforced and NSM reinforced walls had similar maximum moment resistance; however, the average out-of-plane load resistance at the yield point of the walls with NSM reinforcement was 180% of the conventionally reinforced walls. This experimental series represents the first full-scale tests of very slender concrete block masonry walls reinforced with NSM steel bars.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Structural Engineering-asce\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Structural Engineering-asce\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1061/jsendh.steng-11364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Structural Engineering-asce","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/jsendh.steng-11364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文研究了四根细长加筋砌体墙体在轴外联合荷载作用下的响应。该测试系列比较了采用常规预埋钢筋和采用近表面安装(NSM)钢筋的墙体的响应。每面墙由190毫米宽的空心混凝土砌体单元构成,长1200毫米,高7800毫米,总配筋率为0.26%。在弹性响应范围内(高达钢筋名义屈服应变的90%),每面墙都在平面外方向进行简单支撑和循环加载,施加的轴向载荷范围为0至250千牛。各墙弯矩阻力随施加轴向荷载的增大而增大;然而,由于二次弯矩效应,常规加固墙体的面外荷载抗力降低。由于弯矩阻力的增加和系统位移的降低降低了二次弯矩效应,NSM配筋的加劲墙表现出更大的面外荷载阻力。每个墙体的最终加载周期使墙体位移至少达到屈服位移的两倍,同时保持施加的轴向载荷为60千牛(对于常规加固的墙体和其中一个带有NSM加固的墙体)或120千牛(对于其中一个带有NSM加固的墙体)。对比墙体在最后加载周期的响应,常规加筋和NSM加筋墙体具有相似的最大弯矩阻力;然而,在屈服点处,NSM加固墙体的平均面外荷载阻力是常规加固墙体的180%。这个实验系列代表了用NSM钢筋加固的非常细长的混凝土砌块砌体墙的第一个全尺寸测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Response of Full-Scale Slender Masonry Walls with Conventional and NSM Steel Reinforcement Subjected to Axial and Out-of-Plane Loads
The response of four slender reinforced masonry walls to combined axial and out-of-plane loading is presented herein. The testing series compares the response of walls with conventionally embedded steel reinforcing bars to those with near-surface-mounted (NSM) steel reinforcement. Each wall was constructed from 190 mm wide hollow concrete masonry units to a length of 1,200 mm and a height of 7,800 mm, with a gross reinforcement ratio of 0.26%. Each wall was simply supported and loaded cyclically in the out-of-plane direction within the elastic response range (up to 90% of the nominal yield strain of the reinforcing bars) with the applied axial loading ranging from 0 to 250 kN. The moment resistance of each wall increased with increasing applied axial load; however, the out-of-plane load resistance of the conventionally reinforced walls decreased due to secondary moment effects. The stiffer walls with NSM reinforcement exhibited increasing out-of-plane load resistance due to the increasing moment resistance and to the lower displacement of the system which reduced secondary moment effects. The final loading cycle of each wall displaced the walls to at least twice the yield displacement while maintaining an imposed axial load of 60 kN (for both conventionally reinforced walls and one of the walls with NSM reinforcement) or 120 kN (for one of the walls with NSM reinforcement). Comparing the response of the walls in their final loading cycles, the conventionally reinforced and NSM reinforced walls had similar maximum moment resistance; however, the average out-of-plane load resistance at the yield point of the walls with NSM reinforcement was 180% of the conventionally reinforced walls. This experimental series represents the first full-scale tests of very slender concrete block masonry walls reinforced with NSM steel bars.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信