切口引流与超声引导下吸痰引流治疗乳腺脓肿:一项前瞻性随机对照研究

Nikita Ranjan, Mukesh Soni, ManinderK Chhabra, Preety Deshpande, Akshay Nagwani
{"title":"切口引流与超声引导下吸痰引流治疗乳腺脓肿:一项前瞻性随机对照研究","authors":"Nikita Ranjan, Mukesh Soni, ManinderK Chhabra, Preety Deshpande, Akshay Nagwani","doi":"10.4103/mgmj.mgmj_73_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Breast abscesses commonly arise during lactation, with the conventional treatment method involving incision and drainage. Nevertheless, a promising, less invasive alternative for managing extensive and multilocular abscesses involves employing ultrasound-guided suction drainage and a fistulotomy probe. Aims and Objectives: This study evaluates and contrasts the results of two approaches in treating breast abscesses: ultrasound-guided suction drainage and the conventional incision and drainage method. The comparison will be centered around various parameters, such as procedural duration, patient-reported pain levels, breastfeeding capability, incidence of complications, overall hospitalization duration, and cosmetic results. Materials and Methods: In this research, we enrolled a total of 60 patients who had been diagnosed with breast abscesses. These patients were randomly assigned to two groups of 30 individuals. The control group underwent the conventional incision and drainage procedure under general anesthesia. In contrast, the study group received an innovative treatment method involving ultrasound-guided suction drainage using a fistulotomy probe to address the abscess’s compartments. This intervention was carried out under local anesthesia. The process involved the percutaneous insertion of an 18Fr suction catheter connected to the fistula probe. The catheter was carefully guided into the abscess cavity with the assistance of ultrasound imaging, following its longest axis. In multilocular abscesses, the catheter was threaded through all the compartments. Subsequently, the fistulotomy probe was detached from the drain within the abscess cavity to disrupt the compartments. Results: Using ultrasound-guided suction drainage showcased numerous benefits compared to the conventional method. It led to a shorter procedure duration, decreased patient discomfort, no interference with breastfeeding, accelerated healing, reduced hospitalization periods, enhanced cosmetic results, and a lower incidence of complications compared to the traditional approach. Conclusion: Using ultrasound-guided suction drainage for breast abscesses provides all the benefits associated with a minimally invasive strategy. Furthermore, using a fistulotomy probe demonstrates the equal effectiveness of this technique in addressing both large and multilocular abscesses compared to the traditional incision and drainage method.","PeriodicalId":52587,"journal":{"name":"MGM Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incision and drainage and ultrasound-guided suction drainage for the management of breast abscess: A prospective randomized comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Nikita Ranjan, Mukesh Soni, ManinderK Chhabra, Preety Deshpande, Akshay Nagwani\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/mgmj.mgmj_73_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Breast abscesses commonly arise during lactation, with the conventional treatment method involving incision and drainage. Nevertheless, a promising, less invasive alternative for managing extensive and multilocular abscesses involves employing ultrasound-guided suction drainage and a fistulotomy probe. Aims and Objectives: This study evaluates and contrasts the results of two approaches in treating breast abscesses: ultrasound-guided suction drainage and the conventional incision and drainage method. The comparison will be centered around various parameters, such as procedural duration, patient-reported pain levels, breastfeeding capability, incidence of complications, overall hospitalization duration, and cosmetic results. Materials and Methods: In this research, we enrolled a total of 60 patients who had been diagnosed with breast abscesses. These patients were randomly assigned to two groups of 30 individuals. The control group underwent the conventional incision and drainage procedure under general anesthesia. In contrast, the study group received an innovative treatment method involving ultrasound-guided suction drainage using a fistulotomy probe to address the abscess’s compartments. This intervention was carried out under local anesthesia. The process involved the percutaneous insertion of an 18Fr suction catheter connected to the fistula probe. The catheter was carefully guided into the abscess cavity with the assistance of ultrasound imaging, following its longest axis. In multilocular abscesses, the catheter was threaded through all the compartments. Subsequently, the fistulotomy probe was detached from the drain within the abscess cavity to disrupt the compartments. Results: Using ultrasound-guided suction drainage showcased numerous benefits compared to the conventional method. It led to a shorter procedure duration, decreased patient discomfort, no interference with breastfeeding, accelerated healing, reduced hospitalization periods, enhanced cosmetic results, and a lower incidence of complications compared to the traditional approach. Conclusion: Using ultrasound-guided suction drainage for breast abscesses provides all the benefits associated with a minimally invasive strategy. Furthermore, using a fistulotomy probe demonstrates the equal effectiveness of this technique in addressing both large and multilocular abscesses compared to the traditional incision and drainage method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MGM Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MGM Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/mgmj.mgmj_73_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MGM Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/mgmj.mgmj_73_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳房脓肿通常发生在哺乳期,传统的治疗方法是切开引流。然而,一种有前途的、侵入性较小的治疗广泛和多房脓肿的方法是采用超声引导下的吸引引流和瘘管切开术。目的:本研究对超声引导下的吸痰引流和传统的切口引流两种治疗乳腺脓肿的方法进行了评价和比较。比较将围绕各种参数进行,如手术时间、患者报告的疼痛程度、母乳喂养能力、并发症发生率、总住院时间和美容效果。材料与方法:在本研究中,我们共招募了60例被诊断为乳腺脓肿的患者。这些患者被随机分为两组,每组30人。对照组在全麻下行常规切开引流手术。相比之下,研究组接受了一种创新的治疗方法,包括超声引导下使用瘘管切开术探头来解决脓肿的腔室。该干预在局部麻醉下进行。该过程涉及经皮插入18Fr吸管连接到瘘探头。在超声成像的帮助下,导管沿着其最长的轴进入脓肿腔。在多房脓肿中,导管穿过所有腔室。随后,将切开瘘管的探针从脓肿腔内的引流管上分离,以破坏腔室。结果:超声引导下的抽吸引流术与常规方法相比具有诸多优点。与传统方法相比,它缩短了手术时间,减少了患者的不适,不干扰母乳喂养,加速了愈合,缩短了住院时间,提高了美容效果,并降低了并发症的发生率。结论:超声引导下乳腺脓肿抽吸引流具有微创治疗的优点。此外,与传统的切开引流方法相比,使用瘘管切开术探头在处理大脓肿和多房脓肿方面同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incision and drainage and ultrasound-guided suction drainage for the management of breast abscess: A prospective randomized comparative study
Background: Breast abscesses commonly arise during lactation, with the conventional treatment method involving incision and drainage. Nevertheless, a promising, less invasive alternative for managing extensive and multilocular abscesses involves employing ultrasound-guided suction drainage and a fistulotomy probe. Aims and Objectives: This study evaluates and contrasts the results of two approaches in treating breast abscesses: ultrasound-guided suction drainage and the conventional incision and drainage method. The comparison will be centered around various parameters, such as procedural duration, patient-reported pain levels, breastfeeding capability, incidence of complications, overall hospitalization duration, and cosmetic results. Materials and Methods: In this research, we enrolled a total of 60 patients who had been diagnosed with breast abscesses. These patients were randomly assigned to two groups of 30 individuals. The control group underwent the conventional incision and drainage procedure under general anesthesia. In contrast, the study group received an innovative treatment method involving ultrasound-guided suction drainage using a fistulotomy probe to address the abscess’s compartments. This intervention was carried out under local anesthesia. The process involved the percutaneous insertion of an 18Fr suction catheter connected to the fistula probe. The catheter was carefully guided into the abscess cavity with the assistance of ultrasound imaging, following its longest axis. In multilocular abscesses, the catheter was threaded through all the compartments. Subsequently, the fistulotomy probe was detached from the drain within the abscess cavity to disrupt the compartments. Results: Using ultrasound-guided suction drainage showcased numerous benefits compared to the conventional method. It led to a shorter procedure duration, decreased patient discomfort, no interference with breastfeeding, accelerated healing, reduced hospitalization periods, enhanced cosmetic results, and a lower incidence of complications compared to the traditional approach. Conclusion: Using ultrasound-guided suction drainage for breast abscesses provides all the benefits associated with a minimally invasive strategy. Furthermore, using a fistulotomy probe demonstrates the equal effectiveness of this technique in addressing both large and multilocular abscesses compared to the traditional incision and drainage method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信