[骨变化形态学影像学基础研究及功能分析]。

T Ichinose
{"title":"[骨变化形态学影像学基础研究及功能分析]。","authors":"T Ichinose","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study a comparison was made in determining morphometrical changes in bone utilizing standard dental radiographic technique and dental xeroradiography. In terms of energy intensity, results demonstrated that spectrum analysis is consistent with visual evaluation and useful as a technique for objective evaluation of changes in bone. Changes in trabecular patterns were experimentally reproduced using quantitative determinations of calcium and phosphate. The relation between radiographic changes in bone associated with decalcification and variations in bone mineral content actually eluted from a particular site were examined. Changes in radiographic contrast and morphometry are important as indicators in radiographic interpretation, and their effects on visual evaluation of the radiograms were also studied. Also evaluated was the usefulness of the technique of using a spectrum analyzer to physically analyze the energy intensity distribution changes in bone. The findings in this study indicate that changes in both contrast and morphometry provide indicators for radiographic interpretation in DF, and that changes in contrast play a more dominant role with increasing bone density. It was also demonstrated that radiographic interpretation in DXR depends on morphometrical changes rather than changes in contrast as a major indicator. Since there was no difference in the efficiency of visual detection between DF and DXR, the use of DXR appears more beneficial in view of lower radiation exposure. When the detectability was 80%, actual variations in bone mineral content ranged from 24% to 38%. Thus, it may be possible to visually identify much smaller variations in bone mineral content on radiograms by using additional indicators such as pattern recognition and marginal changes of the lesion.</p>","PeriodicalId":77564,"journal":{"name":"Kanagawa shigaku. The Journal of the Kanagawa Odontological Society","volume":"24 1","pages":"139-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Fundamental study on morphological imaging and functional analysis of change in bone].\",\"authors\":\"T Ichinose\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this study a comparison was made in determining morphometrical changes in bone utilizing standard dental radiographic technique and dental xeroradiography. In terms of energy intensity, results demonstrated that spectrum analysis is consistent with visual evaluation and useful as a technique for objective evaluation of changes in bone. Changes in trabecular patterns were experimentally reproduced using quantitative determinations of calcium and phosphate. The relation between radiographic changes in bone associated with decalcification and variations in bone mineral content actually eluted from a particular site were examined. Changes in radiographic contrast and morphometry are important as indicators in radiographic interpretation, and their effects on visual evaluation of the radiograms were also studied. Also evaluated was the usefulness of the technique of using a spectrum analyzer to physically analyze the energy intensity distribution changes in bone. The findings in this study indicate that changes in both contrast and morphometry provide indicators for radiographic interpretation in DF, and that changes in contrast play a more dominant role with increasing bone density. It was also demonstrated that radiographic interpretation in DXR depends on morphometrical changes rather than changes in contrast as a major indicator. Since there was no difference in the efficiency of visual detection between DF and DXR, the use of DXR appears more beneficial in view of lower radiation exposure. When the detectability was 80%, actual variations in bone mineral content ranged from 24% to 38%. Thus, it may be possible to visually identify much smaller variations in bone mineral content on radiograms by using additional indicators such as pattern recognition and marginal changes of the lesion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kanagawa shigaku. The Journal of the Kanagawa Odontological Society\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"139-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kanagawa shigaku. The Journal of the Kanagawa Odontological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kanagawa shigaku. The Journal of the Kanagawa Odontological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,比较了使用标准牙科x线摄影技术和牙科x线摄影技术来确定骨的形态变化。在能量强度方面,结果表明光谱分析与视觉评价一致,并且作为一种客观评价骨变化的技术是有用的。用钙和磷酸盐的定量测定实验再现了小梁模式的变化。检查了与脱钙相关的骨x线片变化与实际从特定部位洗脱的骨矿物质含量变化之间的关系。射线造影剂和形态测量学的变化是射线成像解释的重要指标,它们对射线图像视觉评价的影响也进行了研究。还评估了使用频谱分析仪物理分析骨骼能量强度分布变化技术的实用性。本研究的结果表明,造影剂和形态学的变化为DF的影像学解释提供了指标,并且随着骨密度的增加,造影剂的变化起着更重要的作用。研究还表明,DXR中的放射学解释依赖于形态学变化,而不是对比度变化作为主要指标。由于DF和DXR之间的视觉检测效率没有差异,因此考虑到较低的辐射暴露,使用DXR似乎更有益。当检测率为80%时,骨矿物质含量的实际变化范围为24%至38%。因此,通过使用模式识别和病变边缘变化等附加指标,可以直观地识别x线图上骨矿物质含量的微小变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Fundamental study on morphological imaging and functional analysis of change in bone].

In this study a comparison was made in determining morphometrical changes in bone utilizing standard dental radiographic technique and dental xeroradiography. In terms of energy intensity, results demonstrated that spectrum analysis is consistent with visual evaluation and useful as a technique for objective evaluation of changes in bone. Changes in trabecular patterns were experimentally reproduced using quantitative determinations of calcium and phosphate. The relation between radiographic changes in bone associated with decalcification and variations in bone mineral content actually eluted from a particular site were examined. Changes in radiographic contrast and morphometry are important as indicators in radiographic interpretation, and their effects on visual evaluation of the radiograms were also studied. Also evaluated was the usefulness of the technique of using a spectrum analyzer to physically analyze the energy intensity distribution changes in bone. The findings in this study indicate that changes in both contrast and morphometry provide indicators for radiographic interpretation in DF, and that changes in contrast play a more dominant role with increasing bone density. It was also demonstrated that radiographic interpretation in DXR depends on morphometrical changes rather than changes in contrast as a major indicator. Since there was no difference in the efficiency of visual detection between DF and DXR, the use of DXR appears more beneficial in view of lower radiation exposure. When the detectability was 80%, actual variations in bone mineral content ranged from 24% to 38%. Thus, it may be possible to visually identify much smaller variations in bone mineral content on radiograms by using additional indicators such as pattern recognition and marginal changes of the lesion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信