俄国帝国的科学现代性与文化传统

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
Julia Berest
{"title":"俄国帝国的科学现代性与文化传统","authors":"Julia Berest","doi":"10.30965/22102388-12340020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The emergence of modern science in Russia was a belated and rather abrupt development, unfolding rapidly in the 1860s and significantly challenging Russian traditional culture rooted in the Orthodox religion. As in Western Europe, the spread of scientific ideas that increasingly undermined the religious worldview was controversial and unsettling to many conservative thinkers. In Russia, however, controversy around the religious implications of science was more ideologically charged and complex because it involved the old, waxing question of Russia’s relationship with the West. While Dostoevskii’s attitude towards science has been a subject of long-standing debate, many questions remain overlooked and some are highly controversial. Dostoevskii’s reaction to J. S. Mill (mediated by Strakhov) is one important aspect that has been overlooked in current historiography. Mill’s Logic , widely known to European readers, played a significant role not only in creating the modern philosophy of science but also in stimulating the debate on the relationship between science and religion. By placing the views of Strakhov and Dostoevskii into a European intellectual context, this essay offers a re-evaluation of the theme of science in the works of the two most prominent conservative thinkers in nineteenth-century Russia.","PeriodicalId":40352,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Russian History and Historiography","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scientific Modernity vs. Cultural Tradition in Imperial Russia\",\"authors\":\"Julia Berest\",\"doi\":\"10.30965/22102388-12340020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The emergence of modern science in Russia was a belated and rather abrupt development, unfolding rapidly in the 1860s and significantly challenging Russian traditional culture rooted in the Orthodox religion. As in Western Europe, the spread of scientific ideas that increasingly undermined the religious worldview was controversial and unsettling to many conservative thinkers. In Russia, however, controversy around the religious implications of science was more ideologically charged and complex because it involved the old, waxing question of Russia’s relationship with the West. While Dostoevskii’s attitude towards science has been a subject of long-standing debate, many questions remain overlooked and some are highly controversial. Dostoevskii’s reaction to J. S. Mill (mediated by Strakhov) is one important aspect that has been overlooked in current historiography. Mill’s Logic , widely known to European readers, played a significant role not only in creating the modern philosophy of science but also in stimulating the debate on the relationship between science and religion. By placing the views of Strakhov and Dostoevskii into a European intellectual context, this essay offers a re-evaluation of the theme of science in the works of the two most prominent conservative thinkers in nineteenth-century Russia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Modern Russian History and Historiography\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Modern Russian History and Historiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30965/22102388-12340020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Russian History and Historiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/22102388-12340020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代科学在俄罗斯的出现是一个姗姗来迟且相当突兀的发展,在19世纪60年代迅速展开,对植根于东正教的俄罗斯传统文化构成了重大挑战。就像在西欧一样,科学思想的传播日益削弱了宗教世界观,这对许多保守派思想家来说是有争议和不安的。然而,在俄罗斯,围绕科学的宗教含义的争论更加意识形态化和复杂,因为它涉及到俄罗斯与西方关系的老问题。虽然陀思妥耶夫斯基对科学的态度一直是长期争论的主题,但许多问题仍然被忽视,有些问题极具争议性。陀思妥耶夫斯基对j.s.密尔(由斯特拉霍夫调解)的反应是当前史学中被忽视的一个重要方面。密尔的《逻辑学》为欧洲读者所熟知,它不仅在创造现代科学哲学方面发挥了重要作用,而且在激发关于科学与宗教关系的辩论方面发挥了重要作用。通过将斯特拉霍夫和陀思妥耶夫斯基的观点置于欧洲知识分子的背景下,本文对19世纪俄罗斯两位最杰出的保守思想家的作品中的科学主题进行了重新评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scientific Modernity vs. Cultural Tradition in Imperial Russia
Abstract The emergence of modern science in Russia was a belated and rather abrupt development, unfolding rapidly in the 1860s and significantly challenging Russian traditional culture rooted in the Orthodox religion. As in Western Europe, the spread of scientific ideas that increasingly undermined the religious worldview was controversial and unsettling to many conservative thinkers. In Russia, however, controversy around the religious implications of science was more ideologically charged and complex because it involved the old, waxing question of Russia’s relationship with the West. While Dostoevskii’s attitude towards science has been a subject of long-standing debate, many questions remain overlooked and some are highly controversial. Dostoevskii’s reaction to J. S. Mill (mediated by Strakhov) is one important aspect that has been overlooked in current historiography. Mill’s Logic , widely known to European readers, played a significant role not only in creating the modern philosophy of science but also in stimulating the debate on the relationship between science and religion. By placing the views of Strakhov and Dostoevskii into a European intellectual context, this essay offers a re-evaluation of the theme of science in the works of the two most prominent conservative thinkers in nineteenth-century Russia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信