{"title":"环境DNA补充了传统的采样监测鱼类群落在德克萨斯州河口","authors":"Damon Williford, Polly Hajovsky, Joel Anderson","doi":"10.1002/nafm.10937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has become an important method for inventorying and monitoring biota in aquatic systems. The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department conducts regular fishery‐independent sampling of biotic communities using traditional sampling gears, such as gill nets and bag seines, in all of the major estuaries of adjacent to the Gulf of Mexico in Texas. Previous studies have shown that eDNA approaches can complement traditional sampling methods. Methods We compared fish community structure data in the Cedar Lakes estuary system obtained with traditional sampling gears with data obtained using eDNA sampling using a small sequence of mitochondrial 12S ribosomal RNA gene and a validated taxonomic reference file. Result For spring and fall of 2022, eDNA metabarcoding detected a larger number of species than either bag seines or gill nets. Species richness detected via eDNA in two seasons in a single year was comparable with the species richness of agency’s historical record based on traditional gears for Cedar Lakes. Conclusion Seasonal and spatial variation in species richness was similar between traditional and eDNA sampling; however, eDNA metabarcoding allowed detection of several species that would be difficult or impossible to capture with either bag seines or gill nets. We observed two limitations of eDNA metabarcoding. Read depth was not a good index of relative abundance, which limits our ability to infer relative biomass using single samples. Secondly, we observed detection bias in our eDNA results. Specifically, eDNA failed to detect two species of elasmobranchs present when water sampling was performed and eDNA also performed poorly compared to traditional sampling gears for some species of bony fishes. Despite these limitations, eDNA metabarcoding proved to be an efficient and cost‐effective alternative and compliment to traditional fisheries sampling gears for fishery‐independent monitoring of community structure and composition in estuaries of the Gulf of Mexico.","PeriodicalId":19263,"journal":{"name":"North American Journal of Fisheries Management","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental <scp>DNA</scp> compliments traditional sampling for monitoring fish communities in a Texas estuary\",\"authors\":\"Damon Williford, Polly Hajovsky, Joel Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nafm.10937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objective Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has become an important method for inventorying and monitoring biota in aquatic systems. The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department conducts regular fishery‐independent sampling of biotic communities using traditional sampling gears, such as gill nets and bag seines, in all of the major estuaries of adjacent to the Gulf of Mexico in Texas. Previous studies have shown that eDNA approaches can complement traditional sampling methods. Methods We compared fish community structure data in the Cedar Lakes estuary system obtained with traditional sampling gears with data obtained using eDNA sampling using a small sequence of mitochondrial 12S ribosomal RNA gene and a validated taxonomic reference file. Result For spring and fall of 2022, eDNA metabarcoding detected a larger number of species than either bag seines or gill nets. Species richness detected via eDNA in two seasons in a single year was comparable with the species richness of agency’s historical record based on traditional gears for Cedar Lakes. Conclusion Seasonal and spatial variation in species richness was similar between traditional and eDNA sampling; however, eDNA metabarcoding allowed detection of several species that would be difficult or impossible to capture with either bag seines or gill nets. We observed two limitations of eDNA metabarcoding. Read depth was not a good index of relative abundance, which limits our ability to infer relative biomass using single samples. Secondly, we observed detection bias in our eDNA results. Specifically, eDNA failed to detect two species of elasmobranchs present when water sampling was performed and eDNA also performed poorly compared to traditional sampling gears for some species of bony fishes. Despite these limitations, eDNA metabarcoding proved to be an efficient and cost‐effective alternative and compliment to traditional fisheries sampling gears for fishery‐independent monitoring of community structure and composition in estuaries of the Gulf of Mexico.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North American Journal of Fisheries Management\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North American Journal of Fisheries Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10937\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Journal of Fisheries Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10937","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要目的环境DNA元条形码(Environmental DNA metabarcoding, eDNA)已成为水生生物区系清查和监测的重要方法。德克萨斯州公园和野生动物部在德克萨斯州墨西哥湾附近的所有主要河口,使用传统的采样装置,如刺网和袋式围网,对生物群落进行定期的渔业独立采样。先前的研究表明,eDNA方法可以补充传统的采样方法。方法将传统采样方法获得的雪松湖河口系统鱼类群落结构数据与利用线粒体12S核糖体RNA基因小序列和经过验证的分类参考文件进行eDNA采样获得的数据进行比较。结果2022年春季和秋季,eDNA元条形码检测到的鱼种数量高于袋网和刺网。通过eDNA在一年中两个季节检测到的物种丰富度与机构基于传统年轮的历史记录的物种丰富度相当。结论传统取样和eDNA取样物种丰富度的季节和空间变化相似;然而,eDNA元条形码可以检测到一些用围网或刺网很难或不可能捕获的物种。我们观察到eDNA元条形码的两个局限性。阅读深度不是一个很好的相对丰度指标,这限制了我们使用单个样本推断相对生物量的能力。其次,我们在我们的eDNA结果中观察到检测偏差。具体来说,在进行水样取样时,eDNA未能检测到两种板鳃类,并且与传统取样装置相比,eDNA对某些硬骨鱼类的表现也很差。尽管存在这些限制,eDNA元条形码被证明是一种高效且具有成本效益的替代方案,并补充了传统渔业采样装置,用于对墨西哥湾河口的群落结构和组成进行渔业独立监测。
Environmental DNA compliments traditional sampling for monitoring fish communities in a Texas estuary
Abstract Objective Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has become an important method for inventorying and monitoring biota in aquatic systems. The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department conducts regular fishery‐independent sampling of biotic communities using traditional sampling gears, such as gill nets and bag seines, in all of the major estuaries of adjacent to the Gulf of Mexico in Texas. Previous studies have shown that eDNA approaches can complement traditional sampling methods. Methods We compared fish community structure data in the Cedar Lakes estuary system obtained with traditional sampling gears with data obtained using eDNA sampling using a small sequence of mitochondrial 12S ribosomal RNA gene and a validated taxonomic reference file. Result For spring and fall of 2022, eDNA metabarcoding detected a larger number of species than either bag seines or gill nets. Species richness detected via eDNA in two seasons in a single year was comparable with the species richness of agency’s historical record based on traditional gears for Cedar Lakes. Conclusion Seasonal and spatial variation in species richness was similar between traditional and eDNA sampling; however, eDNA metabarcoding allowed detection of several species that would be difficult or impossible to capture with either bag seines or gill nets. We observed two limitations of eDNA metabarcoding. Read depth was not a good index of relative abundance, which limits our ability to infer relative biomass using single samples. Secondly, we observed detection bias in our eDNA results. Specifically, eDNA failed to detect two species of elasmobranchs present when water sampling was performed and eDNA also performed poorly compared to traditional sampling gears for some species of bony fishes. Despite these limitations, eDNA metabarcoding proved to be an efficient and cost‐effective alternative and compliment to traditional fisheries sampling gears for fishery‐independent monitoring of community structure and composition in estuaries of the Gulf of Mexico.
期刊介绍:
The North American Journal of Fisheries Management promotes communication among fishery managers with an emphasis on North America, and addresses the maintenance, enhancement, and allocation of fisheries resources. It chronicles the development of practical monitoring and management programs for finfish and exploitable shellfish in marine and freshwater environments.
Contributions relate to the management of fish populations, habitats, and users to protect and enhance fish and fishery resources for societal benefits. Case histories of successes, failures, and effects of fisheries programs help convey practical management experience to others.