代理权力

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Nicholas Frank
{"title":"代理权力","authors":"Nicholas Frank","doi":"10.1163/19426720-02903003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Fifteen countries recently signed the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership ( RCEP ) and formed the world’s largest trade bloc between some of the globe’s largest and fastest-growing economies. Employing a text-as-data analysis, this article systematically compares the text of the RCEP to the previous agreements of its members to determine the sources of language in the RCEP and investigate why particular treaty text is replicated more frequently relative to others. The results indicate that language derived from the multiparty and multicontinental trade agreements of the United States, a state not involved in the RCEP negotiations, accounted for a disproportionate share of the finalized text. These findings highlight the temporal dimension of power asymmetries as well as the importance of treaty design itself in the diffusion of regulatory norms and suggest that specific trade agreements serve as reference points for subsequent agreements.","PeriodicalId":47262,"journal":{"name":"Global Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power by Proxy\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Frank\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/19426720-02903003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Fifteen countries recently signed the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership ( RCEP ) and formed the world’s largest trade bloc between some of the globe’s largest and fastest-growing economies. Employing a text-as-data analysis, this article systematically compares the text of the RCEP to the previous agreements of its members to determine the sources of language in the RCEP and investigate why particular treaty text is replicated more frequently relative to others. The results indicate that language derived from the multiparty and multicontinental trade agreements of the United States, a state not involved in the RCEP negotiations, accounted for a disproportionate share of the finalized text. These findings highlight the temporal dimension of power asymmetries as well as the importance of treaty design itself in the diffusion of regulatory norms and suggest that specific trade agreements serve as reference points for subsequent agreements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Governance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02903003\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02903003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,15个国家签署了《区域全面经济伙伴关系协定》(RCEP),并在全球一些最大和增长最快的经济体之间形成了世界上最大的贸易集团。本文采用文本即数据的分析方法,系统地将RCEP的文本与其成员之前的协议进行比较,以确定RCEP中的语言来源,并调查为什么特定条约文本相对于其他条约文本被更频繁地复制。结果表明,来自美国(一个没有参与RCEP谈判的国家)的多党派和多大陆贸易协定的语言在最终文本中占了不成比例的份额。这些发现突出了权力不对称的时间维度,以及条约设计本身在监管规范传播中的重要性,并表明具体的贸易协定可以作为后续协定的参考点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Power by Proxy
Abstract Fifteen countries recently signed the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership ( RCEP ) and formed the world’s largest trade bloc between some of the globe’s largest and fastest-growing economies. Employing a text-as-data analysis, this article systematically compares the text of the RCEP to the previous agreements of its members to determine the sources of language in the RCEP and investigate why particular treaty text is replicated more frequently relative to others. The results indicate that language derived from the multiparty and multicontinental trade agreements of the United States, a state not involved in the RCEP negotiations, accounted for a disproportionate share of the finalized text. These findings highlight the temporal dimension of power asymmetries as well as the importance of treaty design itself in the diffusion of regulatory norms and suggest that specific trade agreements serve as reference points for subsequent agreements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Governance
Global Governance INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信