{"title":"日本海彼得斯大湾沿岸开阔地区软沉积物大型底栖动物群落及其生态状况","authors":"A. V. Moshchenko, T. A. Belan, B. M. Borisov","doi":"10.26428/1606-9919-2023-203-581-600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At least 10 communities of macrozoobenthos are determined by modern statistical methods on soft sediments in the coastal areas of Peter the Great Bay with the depth of ≥ 5 m surveyed in 1992, 1993 and 1996. They were: I. Scoletoma spp. + Ophiura sarsii; II. Aphelochaeta pacifica (I–II — in the Strelok Bay and Rifovaya Inlet); III. O. sarsii + Amphiodia fissa; IV. Scoletoma spp. + Mactra chinensis; V. Scoletoma spp. + Maldane sarsi; VI. Acila insignis (III–VI — in the Posyet Bay and adjacent area); VII. Scoletoma spp. + Echinocardium cordatum; VIII. Dipolydora cardalia + M. sarsi + O. sarsii; IX. Spiophanes uschakovi + E. cordatum, and X. Ampelisca macrocephala (VII–X — in the area at the Tumannaya/Tumen River mouth). Their development was determined by such environmental imperatives as the bottom sediments properties (silting degree, mean grain size), depth, and level of pollution and eutrophication. Majority of these communities (I, III, IV, V, VII, VIII, IX, and X) were in good ecological condition. Their habitats were slightly disturbed (intact or almost intact) and rare or never polluted and eutrophicated. The community II occupied more disturbed habitats with moderate ecological status reflected in higher indices of pollution. This community was rather likely formed in the process of succession in conditions of decreasing pollution. The community VI had a lower ecological status; its differentiation was probably caused by specific oceanographic regime of the Posyet Bay and anthropogenic impacts.","PeriodicalId":491504,"journal":{"name":"Известия Тихоокеанского научно-исследовательского рыбохозяйственного центра","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communities of macrozoobenthos on soft sediments in the coastal areas of open parts of Peter the Great Bay, Japan Sea and their ecological status\",\"authors\":\"A. V. Moshchenko, T. A. Belan, B. M. Borisov\",\"doi\":\"10.26428/1606-9919-2023-203-581-600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At least 10 communities of macrozoobenthos are determined by modern statistical methods on soft sediments in the coastal areas of Peter the Great Bay with the depth of ≥ 5 m surveyed in 1992, 1993 and 1996. They were: I. Scoletoma spp. + Ophiura sarsii; II. Aphelochaeta pacifica (I–II — in the Strelok Bay and Rifovaya Inlet); III. O. sarsii + Amphiodia fissa; IV. Scoletoma spp. + Mactra chinensis; V. Scoletoma spp. + Maldane sarsi; VI. Acila insignis (III–VI — in the Posyet Bay and adjacent area); VII. Scoletoma spp. + Echinocardium cordatum; VIII. Dipolydora cardalia + M. sarsi + O. sarsii; IX. Spiophanes uschakovi + E. cordatum, and X. Ampelisca macrocephala (VII–X — in the area at the Tumannaya/Tumen River mouth). Their development was determined by such environmental imperatives as the bottom sediments properties (silting degree, mean grain size), depth, and level of pollution and eutrophication. Majority of these communities (I, III, IV, V, VII, VIII, IX, and X) were in good ecological condition. Their habitats were slightly disturbed (intact or almost intact) and rare or never polluted and eutrophicated. The community II occupied more disturbed habitats with moderate ecological status reflected in higher indices of pollution. This community was rather likely formed in the process of succession in conditions of decreasing pollution. The community VI had a lower ecological status; its differentiation was probably caused by specific oceanographic regime of the Posyet Bay and anthropogenic impacts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":491504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Известия Тихоокеанского научно-исследовательского рыбохозяйственного центра\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Известия Тихоокеанского научно-исследовательского рыбохозяйственного центра\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26428/1606-9919-2023-203-581-600\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Известия Тихоокеанского научно-исследовательского рыбохозяйственного центра","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26428/1606-9919-2023-203-581-600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
1992年、1993年和1996年在彼得大帝湾沿岸深度≥5 m的软沉积物上用现代统计方法确定了至少10个大型底栖动物群落。它们是:I. Scoletoma spp. +蛇尾蛇(Ophiura sarsii);2太平洋棘鱼(I-II -在Strelok湾和Rifovaya湾);3沙氏弧菌+裂裂Amphiodia;4 . Scoletoma spp. + Mactra chinensis;V. Scoletoma spp. + Maldane sarsi;VI.徽章(III-VI -在波赛特湾及邻近地区);7头骨瘤科+心梗;8双蓼+ M. sarsi + O. sarsii;9Spiophanes uschakovi + E. cordatum和X. Ampelisca macrocephala(在图曼纳亚/图们江口地区)。它们的发展是由诸如底部沉积物性质(淤积程度、平均粒度)、深度、污染和富营养化程度等环境因素决定的。大部分群落(I、III、IV、V、VII、VIII、IX和X)处于良好的生态状态。它们的栖息地受到轻微干扰(完整或几乎完整),很少或从未受到污染和富营养化。群落ⅱ受干扰程度较高,生态状况中等,污染指数较高。该群落很可能是在污染减少条件下的演替过程中形成的。群落VI的生态状况较差;其分异可能是由于波西特湾特定的海洋学状况和人为影响所致。
Communities of macrozoobenthos on soft sediments in the coastal areas of open parts of Peter the Great Bay, Japan Sea and their ecological status
At least 10 communities of macrozoobenthos are determined by modern statistical methods on soft sediments in the coastal areas of Peter the Great Bay with the depth of ≥ 5 m surveyed in 1992, 1993 and 1996. They were: I. Scoletoma spp. + Ophiura sarsii; II. Aphelochaeta pacifica (I–II — in the Strelok Bay and Rifovaya Inlet); III. O. sarsii + Amphiodia fissa; IV. Scoletoma spp. + Mactra chinensis; V. Scoletoma spp. + Maldane sarsi; VI. Acila insignis (III–VI — in the Posyet Bay and adjacent area); VII. Scoletoma spp. + Echinocardium cordatum; VIII. Dipolydora cardalia + M. sarsi + O. sarsii; IX. Spiophanes uschakovi + E. cordatum, and X. Ampelisca macrocephala (VII–X — in the area at the Tumannaya/Tumen River mouth). Their development was determined by such environmental imperatives as the bottom sediments properties (silting degree, mean grain size), depth, and level of pollution and eutrophication. Majority of these communities (I, III, IV, V, VII, VIII, IX, and X) were in good ecological condition. Their habitats were slightly disturbed (intact or almost intact) and rare or never polluted and eutrophicated. The community II occupied more disturbed habitats with moderate ecological status reflected in higher indices of pollution. This community was rather likely formed in the process of succession in conditions of decreasing pollution. The community VI had a lower ecological status; its differentiation was probably caused by specific oceanographic regime of the Posyet Bay and anthropogenic impacts.