Subia Naz, Hakim Shah, Amin Khuwaja, Amjad Ali, Abdur Rasheed
{"title":"PCI术后胸痛(非缺血性)的冥想、理疗等护理干预","authors":"Subia Naz, Hakim Shah, Amin Khuwaja, Amjad Ali, Abdur Rasheed","doi":"10.22442/jlumhs.2023.00997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of nursing educational interventions on patients with post PCI non-ischemic chest pain. METHODOLOGY: This experimental study was conducted from December 2017 to May 2018 on 100 post PCI patients. Patients who came with post PCI non-ischemic chest pain and on initial screening on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) patients scored 5 to 10 were included. Those who had post PCI ischemic chest pain with complications were excluded from the study. The Short McGill Pain Questionnaire (SMPQ) was used to assess the effectiveness of nursing educational interventions. Analysis of data was performed on SPSS version 21. Percentages were used for categorical variables, and inferential statistics were calculated using the Mann-Whitney Test. Mean and S.D. were calculated at baseline, week two, week four, and week six for both experimental and non-experimental groups. A P-value of 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: This study's findings showed that most participants (74%) were males and almost all (99%) were married. The P-value is significant at different intervals between the experimental and control groups at two, four and six weeks with P-values <0.001, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study revealed that nursing interventions help reduce post PCI non-ischemic chest pain levels. This study demonstrates that after nurse-led educational interventions, there were significant differences in scores between interventional and non- interventional groups at different levels after PCI. KEYWORDS: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Chest Pain, Numerical Rating Scale, Short McGill Pain Questionnaire.","PeriodicalId":43685,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nursing Intervention Including Meditation and Physiotherapeutic Treatment in Post PCI Chest Pain (Non-Ischemic)\",\"authors\":\"Subia Naz, Hakim Shah, Amin Khuwaja, Amjad Ali, Abdur Rasheed\",\"doi\":\"10.22442/jlumhs.2023.00997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of nursing educational interventions on patients with post PCI non-ischemic chest pain. METHODOLOGY: This experimental study was conducted from December 2017 to May 2018 on 100 post PCI patients. Patients who came with post PCI non-ischemic chest pain and on initial screening on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) patients scored 5 to 10 were included. Those who had post PCI ischemic chest pain with complications were excluded from the study. The Short McGill Pain Questionnaire (SMPQ) was used to assess the effectiveness of nursing educational interventions. Analysis of data was performed on SPSS version 21. Percentages were used for categorical variables, and inferential statistics were calculated using the Mann-Whitney Test. Mean and S.D. were calculated at baseline, week two, week four, and week six for both experimental and non-experimental groups. A P-value of 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: This study's findings showed that most participants (74%) were males and almost all (99%) were married. The P-value is significant at different intervals between the experimental and control groups at two, four and six weeks with P-values <0.001, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study revealed that nursing interventions help reduce post PCI non-ischemic chest pain levels. This study demonstrates that after nurse-led educational interventions, there were significant differences in scores between interventional and non- interventional groups at different levels after PCI. KEYWORDS: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Chest Pain, Numerical Rating Scale, Short McGill Pain Questionnaire.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22442/jlumhs.2023.00997\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22442/jlumhs.2023.00997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨护理教育干预对PCI术后非缺血性胸痛患者的治疗效果。方法:本实验研究于2017年12月至2018年5月对100例PCI术后患者进行研究。包括PCI术后非缺血性胸痛患者和在数值评定量表(NRS)中评分为5至10分的初始筛查患者。PCI术后缺血性胸痛伴并发症的患者被排除在研究之外。采用短麦吉尔疼痛问卷(SMPQ)评估护理教育干预的有效性。数据分析采用SPSS version 21软件。分类变量采用百分比,推断统计量采用曼-惠特尼检验。计算实验组和非实验组在基线、第2周、第4周和第6周的平均值和标准差。p值为0.05被认为是显著的。结果:本研究结果显示,大多数参与者(74%)为男性,几乎所有参与者(99%)都已婚。实验组和对照组在第2周、第4周和第6周的p值在不同的间隔上显著,p值分别为<0.001、<0.001和<0.001。结论:本研究结果显示护理干预有助于降低PCI术后非缺血性胸痛水平。本研究表明,经过护士主导的教育干预后,PCI术后不同水平的介入组与非介入组的评分存在显著差异。关键词:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,胸痛,数值评定量表,短麦吉尔疼痛问卷。
Nursing Intervention Including Meditation and Physiotherapeutic Treatment in Post PCI Chest Pain (Non-Ischemic)
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of nursing educational interventions on patients with post PCI non-ischemic chest pain. METHODOLOGY: This experimental study was conducted from December 2017 to May 2018 on 100 post PCI patients. Patients who came with post PCI non-ischemic chest pain and on initial screening on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) patients scored 5 to 10 were included. Those who had post PCI ischemic chest pain with complications were excluded from the study. The Short McGill Pain Questionnaire (SMPQ) was used to assess the effectiveness of nursing educational interventions. Analysis of data was performed on SPSS version 21. Percentages were used for categorical variables, and inferential statistics were calculated using the Mann-Whitney Test. Mean and S.D. were calculated at baseline, week two, week four, and week six for both experimental and non-experimental groups. A P-value of 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: This study's findings showed that most participants (74%) were males and almost all (99%) were married. The P-value is significant at different intervals between the experimental and control groups at two, four and six weeks with P-values <0.001, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study revealed that nursing interventions help reduce post PCI non-ischemic chest pain levels. This study demonstrates that after nurse-led educational interventions, there were significant differences in scores between interventional and non- interventional groups at different levels after PCI. KEYWORDS: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Chest Pain, Numerical Rating Scale, Short McGill Pain Questionnaire.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences (JLUMHS) Jamshoro, Pakistan publishes original manuscripts, case reports and reviews on topics related to medical and health sciences. JLUMHS is a peer reviewed journal and is published quarterly (4 issues per year) since July 2002. It agrees to accept manuscripts prepared in accordance with the “Uniform Requirements for submission of manuscripts for biomedical journals adopted by International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), updated October 2001 (Refer JLUMHS July – December 2002 issue).