特刊导论:社会阶级和社会经济地位的细微差别(特刊导论:社会阶级和社会经济地位概念的细微差别)

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Matthew J. Easterbrook, Toon Kuppens, Lusine Grigoryan
{"title":"特刊导论:社会阶级和社会经济地位的细微差别(特刊导论:社会阶级和社会经济地位概念的细微差别)","authors":"Matthew J. Easterbrook, Toon Kuppens, Lusine Grigoryan","doi":"10.1080/02134748.2023.2239577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The social psychological study of social class and socioeconomic status (SES) has burgeoned in the last 15 years and much progress has been made. Yet, researchers rarely explain their theoretical standpoint, clearly define social class and/or SES or justify their choice of how to measure it. This, we argue, is holding back progress. We suggest that social class should be considered a social category into which we are socialized that affords differing amounts of economic, social and cultural resources, while SES only captures one’s current access to various forms of capital. We briefly review literature that suggests that the meanings, understandings and thus operationalizations of social class and SES vary across groups and contexts. We then give an overview of the special issue, which documents the advances that can be gained from taking a more nuanced and theoretically informed approach to studying social class and SES.","PeriodicalId":42024,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Psicologia Social","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to the special issue: nuances of social class and socioeconomic status (<i>Introducción a este monográfico: los matices del concepto de clase social y del nivel socioeconómico</i>)\",\"authors\":\"Matthew J. Easterbrook, Toon Kuppens, Lusine Grigoryan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02134748.2023.2239577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The social psychological study of social class and socioeconomic status (SES) has burgeoned in the last 15 years and much progress has been made. Yet, researchers rarely explain their theoretical standpoint, clearly define social class and/or SES or justify their choice of how to measure it. This, we argue, is holding back progress. We suggest that social class should be considered a social category into which we are socialized that affords differing amounts of economic, social and cultural resources, while SES only captures one’s current access to various forms of capital. We briefly review literature that suggests that the meanings, understandings and thus operationalizations of social class and SES vary across groups and contexts. We then give an overview of the special issue, which documents the advances that can be gained from taking a more nuanced and theoretically informed approach to studying social class and SES.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista De Psicologia Social\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista De Psicologia Social\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2023.2239577\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Psicologia Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2023.2239577","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会阶层和社会经济地位(SES)的社会心理学研究是近15年来兴起的,取得了很大进展。然而,研究人员很少解释他们的理论立场,明确定义社会阶层和/或社会经济地位,或证明他们选择如何衡量它。我们认为,这阻碍了进步。我们建议,社会阶层应该被视为我们被社会化的一个社会类别,它提供了不同数量的经济、社会和文化资源,而SES只捕获了一个人当前获得各种形式资本的途径。我们简要回顾了一些文献,这些文献表明社会阶层和社会地位的含义、理解和操作在不同的群体和背景下是不同的。然后,我们对这期特刊进行了概述,该特刊记录了采用更细致入微和理论上明智的方法来研究社会阶级和社会地位所取得的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction to the special issue: nuances of social class and socioeconomic status (Introducción a este monográfico: los matices del concepto de clase social y del nivel socioeconómico)
The social psychological study of social class and socioeconomic status (SES) has burgeoned in the last 15 years and much progress has been made. Yet, researchers rarely explain their theoretical standpoint, clearly define social class and/or SES or justify their choice of how to measure it. This, we argue, is holding back progress. We suggest that social class should be considered a social category into which we are socialized that affords differing amounts of economic, social and cultural resources, while SES only captures one’s current access to various forms of capital. We briefly review literature that suggests that the meanings, understandings and thus operationalizations of social class and SES vary across groups and contexts. We then give an overview of the special issue, which documents the advances that can be gained from taking a more nuanced and theoretically informed approach to studying social class and SES.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista De Psicologia Social
Revista De Psicologia Social PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信