{"title":"数据与物理联合驱动的叠前AVA弹性参数反演","authors":"Shuliang Wu, Yingying Wang, Qingping Li, Zhiliang He, Jianhua Geng","doi":"10.1190/geo2023-0135.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Elastic parameters such as P- and S-wave velocity and density are of great significance for subsurface quantitative interpretation and reservoir prediction. Current pre-stack amplitude-versus-angle (AVA) inversion methods have been widely used in industry to obtain subsurface elastic parameters. Conventional AVA inversion methods are theoretically based on a linearized physical model formulating the relationship between pre-stack seismic reflection coefficients and subsurface model elastic parameters, called physical model-driven inversion. However, the linearized physical models lead to low accuracy and high uncertainty of inversion results. In recent years, several neural network-based pre-stack AVA inversion methods, called data-driven inversion, have been developed to address this issue. But these methods typically require a large amount of labeled data for training network, and the process does not have a clear physical mechanism. So the data-driven inversion results lack physical interpretability. To address these issues, a joint data- and physics-driven inversion of pre-stack AVA elastic parameters is proposed. Under the framework of semi-supervised learning, a two-dimensional convolutional neural network and a recurrent neural network are used to establish the mapping between several adjacent pre-stack AVA gathers and one-dimensional elastic parameters in time domain. The full Zoeppritz equation is used as a physical model constraint to the neural network, and loss functions are constructed using both well-logging data and pre-stack AVA seismic data. This approach can perform training network using small labeled data and increase physical interpretability of the inversion process. The inverse distance weighted correlation coefficient of seismic data is proposed to weight the loss function of seismic data and well-logging data. Synthetic and field data examples show that the joint data- and physics-driven pre-stack AVA elastic parameters inversion improves the accuracy and resolution, and provides an estimation of uncertainty of the inversion results.","PeriodicalId":55102,"journal":{"name":"Geophysics","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Joint Data- and Physics-driven Pre-stack AVA Elastic Parameters Inversion\",\"authors\":\"Shuliang Wu, Yingying Wang, Qingping Li, Zhiliang He, Jianhua Geng\",\"doi\":\"10.1190/geo2023-0135.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Elastic parameters such as P- and S-wave velocity and density are of great significance for subsurface quantitative interpretation and reservoir prediction. Current pre-stack amplitude-versus-angle (AVA) inversion methods have been widely used in industry to obtain subsurface elastic parameters. Conventional AVA inversion methods are theoretically based on a linearized physical model formulating the relationship between pre-stack seismic reflection coefficients and subsurface model elastic parameters, called physical model-driven inversion. However, the linearized physical models lead to low accuracy and high uncertainty of inversion results. In recent years, several neural network-based pre-stack AVA inversion methods, called data-driven inversion, have been developed to address this issue. But these methods typically require a large amount of labeled data for training network, and the process does not have a clear physical mechanism. So the data-driven inversion results lack physical interpretability. To address these issues, a joint data- and physics-driven inversion of pre-stack AVA elastic parameters is proposed. Under the framework of semi-supervised learning, a two-dimensional convolutional neural network and a recurrent neural network are used to establish the mapping between several adjacent pre-stack AVA gathers and one-dimensional elastic parameters in time domain. The full Zoeppritz equation is used as a physical model constraint to the neural network, and loss functions are constructed using both well-logging data and pre-stack AVA seismic data. This approach can perform training network using small labeled data and increase physical interpretability of the inversion process. The inverse distance weighted correlation coefficient of seismic data is proposed to weight the loss function of seismic data and well-logging data. Synthetic and field data examples show that the joint data- and physics-driven pre-stack AVA elastic parameters inversion improves the accuracy and resolution, and provides an estimation of uncertainty of the inversion results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geophysics\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2023-0135.1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2023-0135.1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Joint Data- and Physics-driven Pre-stack AVA Elastic Parameters Inversion
Elastic parameters such as P- and S-wave velocity and density are of great significance for subsurface quantitative interpretation and reservoir prediction. Current pre-stack amplitude-versus-angle (AVA) inversion methods have been widely used in industry to obtain subsurface elastic parameters. Conventional AVA inversion methods are theoretically based on a linearized physical model formulating the relationship between pre-stack seismic reflection coefficients and subsurface model elastic parameters, called physical model-driven inversion. However, the linearized physical models lead to low accuracy and high uncertainty of inversion results. In recent years, several neural network-based pre-stack AVA inversion methods, called data-driven inversion, have been developed to address this issue. But these methods typically require a large amount of labeled data for training network, and the process does not have a clear physical mechanism. So the data-driven inversion results lack physical interpretability. To address these issues, a joint data- and physics-driven inversion of pre-stack AVA elastic parameters is proposed. Under the framework of semi-supervised learning, a two-dimensional convolutional neural network and a recurrent neural network are used to establish the mapping between several adjacent pre-stack AVA gathers and one-dimensional elastic parameters in time domain. The full Zoeppritz equation is used as a physical model constraint to the neural network, and loss functions are constructed using both well-logging data and pre-stack AVA seismic data. This approach can perform training network using small labeled data and increase physical interpretability of the inversion process. The inverse distance weighted correlation coefficient of seismic data is proposed to weight the loss function of seismic data and well-logging data. Synthetic and field data examples show that the joint data- and physics-driven pre-stack AVA elastic parameters inversion improves the accuracy and resolution, and provides an estimation of uncertainty of the inversion results.
期刊介绍:
Geophysics, published by the Society of Exploration Geophysicists since 1936, is an archival journal encompassing all aspects of research, exploration, and education in applied geophysics.
Geophysics articles, generally more than 275 per year in six issues, cover the entire spectrum of geophysical methods, including seismology, potential fields, electromagnetics, and borehole measurements. Geophysics, a bimonthly, provides theoretical and mathematical tools needed to reproduce depicted work, encouraging further development and research.
Geophysics papers, drawn from industry and academia, undergo a rigorous peer-review process to validate the described methods and conclusions and ensure the highest editorial and production quality. Geophysics editors strongly encourage the use of real data, including actual case histories, to highlight current technology and tutorials to stimulate ideas. Some issues feature a section of solicited papers on a particular subject of current interest. Recent special sections focused on seismic anisotropy, subsalt exploration and development, and microseismic monitoring.
The PDF format of each Geophysics paper is the official version of record.