{"title":"国家宪章报告卡:根据特许学生的表现对各州进行新的排名","authors":"Paul E. Peterson, M. Danish Shakeel","doi":"10.1080/15582159.2023.2273607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Five groups rank state charter school environments according to their laws, regulations, funding, and other characteristics, but none rank states by charter student performances on a national test. We rank states by demographically adjusted math and reading performances of charter students in 4th and 8th grade for the period 2009 to 2019 on the National Assessment of Educational Progress. State positions correlate (0.33) with standings for all public-school students. Overall charter standings correlate with subgroup rankings: Black (0.92), Hispanic (0.77), lower-income (0.95), lower-education (0.92), urban (0.97), non-urban (0.74). Nonprofit schools in networks outperform for-profit and stand-alone schools.","PeriodicalId":34913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Choice","volume":"137 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Nation’s Charter Report Card: A New Ranking of States by Charter Student Performance\",\"authors\":\"Paul E. Peterson, M. Danish Shakeel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15582159.2023.2273607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Five groups rank state charter school environments according to their laws, regulations, funding, and other characteristics, but none rank states by charter student performances on a national test. We rank states by demographically adjusted math and reading performances of charter students in 4th and 8th grade for the period 2009 to 2019 on the National Assessment of Educational Progress. State positions correlate (0.33) with standings for all public-school students. Overall charter standings correlate with subgroup rankings: Black (0.92), Hispanic (0.77), lower-income (0.95), lower-education (0.92), urban (0.97), non-urban (0.74). Nonprofit schools in networks outperform for-profit and stand-alone schools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of School Choice\",\"volume\":\"137 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of School Choice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2023.2273607\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Choice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2023.2273607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
五个组织根据各州的法律、法规、资金和其他特征对各州的特许学校环境进行排名,但没有一个组织根据特许学生在全国考试中的表现对各州进行排名。我们根据2009年至2019年国家教育进步评估(National Assessment of Educational Progress)中四年级和八年级特许学生的数学和阅读成绩进行人口调整,对各州进行排名。各州的排名与所有公立学校学生的排名相关(0.33)。总体宪章排名与子群体排名相关:黑人(0.92),西班牙裔(0.77),低收入(0.95),低教育(0.92),城市(0.97),非城市(0.74)。网络中的非营利性学校比营利性学校和独立学校表现更好。
The Nation’s Charter Report Card: A New Ranking of States by Charter Student Performance
Five groups rank state charter school environments according to their laws, regulations, funding, and other characteristics, but none rank states by charter student performances on a national test. We rank states by demographically adjusted math and reading performances of charter students in 4th and 8th grade for the period 2009 to 2019 on the National Assessment of Educational Progress. State positions correlate (0.33) with standings for all public-school students. Overall charter standings correlate with subgroup rankings: Black (0.92), Hispanic (0.77), lower-income (0.95), lower-education (0.92), urban (0.97), non-urban (0.74). Nonprofit schools in networks outperform for-profit and stand-alone schools.