跨声速压气机叶片设计优化与实验之间的差距

IF 1.3 Q2 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
Edwin Joseph Munoz Lopez, Alexander Hergt, Till Ockenfels, Sebastian Grund, Volker Gümmer
{"title":"跨声速压气机叶片设计优化与实验之间的差距","authors":"Edwin Joseph Munoz Lopez, Alexander Hergt, Till Ockenfels, Sebastian Grund, Volker Gümmer","doi":"10.3390/ijtpp8040047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The successful design of compressor blades through numerical optimization relies on accurate CFD-RANS solvers that are able to capture the general performance of a given design candidate. However, this is a difficult task to achieve in transonic flow conditions, where the flow is dominated by inherently unsteady shock effects. In order to assess the current gap between numerics and experiments, the DLR has tested the recently optimized Transonic Cascade TEAMAero at the transonic cascade wind tunnel. The tests were performed at a Mach number of 1.2 and with inflow angles between 145 and 147. The results indicate satisfactory agreement across the expected working range, over which the cascade losses were consistently predicted within a 3–6% error. However, some key differences are observed in the details of the wake and in the performance near the endpoints of the working range. This comparison helps validate the design process but also informs its constraints based on the limitations of CFD-RANS solvers.","PeriodicalId":36626,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Current Gap between Design Optimization and Experiments for Transonic Compressor Blades\",\"authors\":\"Edwin Joseph Munoz Lopez, Alexander Hergt, Till Ockenfels, Sebastian Grund, Volker Gümmer\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ijtpp8040047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The successful design of compressor blades through numerical optimization relies on accurate CFD-RANS solvers that are able to capture the general performance of a given design candidate. However, this is a difficult task to achieve in transonic flow conditions, where the flow is dominated by inherently unsteady shock effects. In order to assess the current gap between numerics and experiments, the DLR has tested the recently optimized Transonic Cascade TEAMAero at the transonic cascade wind tunnel. The tests were performed at a Mach number of 1.2 and with inflow angles between 145 and 147. The results indicate satisfactory agreement across the expected working range, over which the cascade losses were consistently predicted within a 3–6% error. However, some key differences are observed in the details of the wake and in the performance near the endpoints of the working range. This comparison helps validate the design process but also informs its constraints based on the limitations of CFD-RANS solvers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijtpp8040047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijtpp8040047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过数值优化设计压气机叶片的成功依赖于精确的cfd - ran解算器,该解算器能够捕获给定候选设计的一般性能。然而,在跨声速流动条件下,这是一项很难实现的任务,因为在跨声速流动条件下,流动由固有的非定常激波效应主导。为了评估目前数值与实验之间的差距,DLR在跨音速叶栅风洞中测试了最近优化的跨音速叶栅TEAMAero。试验在马赫数为1.2、入流角为145 ~ 147的条件下进行。结果表明,在预期的工作范围内,叶栅损失的预测结果一致,误差在3-6%以内。然而,在尾流的细节和工作范围端点附近的性能上观察到一些关键的差异。这种比较有助于验证设计过程,但也根据cfd - ran求解器的局限性告知其约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Current Gap between Design Optimization and Experiments for Transonic Compressor Blades
The successful design of compressor blades through numerical optimization relies on accurate CFD-RANS solvers that are able to capture the general performance of a given design candidate. However, this is a difficult task to achieve in transonic flow conditions, where the flow is dominated by inherently unsteady shock effects. In order to assess the current gap between numerics and experiments, the DLR has tested the recently optimized Transonic Cascade TEAMAero at the transonic cascade wind tunnel. The tests were performed at a Mach number of 1.2 and with inflow angles between 145 and 147. The results indicate satisfactory agreement across the expected working range, over which the cascade losses were consistently predicted within a 3–6% error. However, some key differences are observed in the details of the wake and in the performance near the endpoints of the working range. This comparison helps validate the design process but also informs its constraints based on the limitations of CFD-RANS solvers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
21.40%
发文量
29
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信