现金流的来源会影响消费还是储蓄?

Valrie Chambers, Eugene Bland, Marilyn Spencer
{"title":"现金流的来源会影响消费还是储蓄?","authors":"Valrie Chambers, Eugene Bland, Marilyn Spencer","doi":"10.61190/fsr.v26i3.3324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines whether people use different mental accounts for different types of hypothetical revenue windfalls rather than viewing them as fungible in their use consistent with neoclassical economics. This study finds that the income source sometimes influenced the amount spent/saved and a respondent’s general default as a spender or saver was highly significant in all regressions. This article adds to the literature by responding to Epley and Gneezy’s (2007) call for “a broader sample of participants, varying amounts of payment, and alternative frames” to identify moderators of windfall framing effects with implications for behavioral economic theory and financial planning.","PeriodicalId":100530,"journal":{"name":"Financial Services Review","volume":"67 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the source of a cash flow affect spending versus saving?\",\"authors\":\"Valrie Chambers, Eugene Bland, Marilyn Spencer\",\"doi\":\"10.61190/fsr.v26i3.3324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines whether people use different mental accounts for different types of hypothetical revenue windfalls rather than viewing them as fungible in their use consistent with neoclassical economics. This study finds that the income source sometimes influenced the amount spent/saved and a respondent’s general default as a spender or saver was highly significant in all regressions. This article adds to the literature by responding to Epley and Gneezy’s (2007) call for “a broader sample of participants, varying amounts of payment, and alternative frames” to identify moderators of windfall framing effects with implications for behavioral economic theory and financial planning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Financial Services Review\",\"volume\":\"67 8\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Financial Services Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v26i3.3324\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v26i3.3324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究考察了人们是否对不同类型的假想收入意外之财使用不同的心理账户,而不是将其视为与新古典经济学一致的可替代使用账户。本研究发现,收入来源有时会影响消费/储蓄的金额,而受访者作为消费或储蓄者的普遍违约在所有回归中都是非常显著的。本文回应了Epley和Gneezy(2007)的呼吁,即“更广泛的参与者样本、不同的支付金额和替代框架”,以确定意外之财框架效应的调节因子,并对行为经济理论和财务规划产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the source of a cash flow affect spending versus saving?
This study examines whether people use different mental accounts for different types of hypothetical revenue windfalls rather than viewing them as fungible in their use consistent with neoclassical economics. This study finds that the income source sometimes influenced the amount spent/saved and a respondent’s general default as a spender or saver was highly significant in all regressions. This article adds to the literature by responding to Epley and Gneezy’s (2007) call for “a broader sample of participants, varying amounts of payment, and alternative frames” to identify moderators of windfall framing effects with implications for behavioral economic theory and financial planning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信