基于能力的综合培训对小农能力发展和绩效提高的影响:埃塞俄比亚案例研究

IF 1.5 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Chalachew Tarekegne, Renate Wesselink, Harm J. A. Biemans, Martin Mulder
{"title":"基于能力的综合培训对小农能力发展和绩效提高的影响:埃塞俄比亚案例研究","authors":"Chalachew Tarekegne,&nbsp;Renate Wesselink,&nbsp;Harm J. A. Biemans,&nbsp;Martin Mulder","doi":"10.1111/ijtd.12314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Low yield/hectare gains, food insecurity and environmental unsustainability are challenges experienced by the agriculture sector in Ethiopia despite substantial government investment. Although there are many factors that contribute to the poor performance of the sector, smallholder farmer competence gaps are principal among them. This study aims to examine the effects of Comprehensive Competence-Based Training (CCBT) on the competence development and performance improvement of smallholder farmers using the authentic professional core task during maize planting as a problem context. We applied a 3-week randomized (control group pretest posttest) design and single-blind field experiment to test the impact of CCBT through provision of a training to two comparable farmer groups using conventional ‘Low-CBT’ and innovative ‘High-CBT’ implementation levels. The samples included ‘High-CBT’ (<i>N</i> = 220) and ‘Low-CBT’ (<i>N</i> = 220) groups of smallholder farmers in the West Gojjam Zone in Ethiopia. Data on competence development and performance improvement of farmers were collected from themselves, trainer Development Agents and Trained Assessors. The yield in quintal/hectare gains for each smallholder farmer was collected twice (before and after the intervention). Repeated (pretest, posttest) MANOVA and ANOVA measurements were used to analyze the data. The results revealed that the development of smallholder farmer competence in ‘High-CBT’ was higher than in ‘Low-CBT’ training. Comparisons of performance in both the authentic job situation and in terms of yield in quintal/hectare gains in the two groups revealed a better performance of both groups. However, the ‘High-CBT’ group performed better than the ‘Low-CBT’ group in both the authentic job situation and in terms of yield in quintal/hectare gains. We obtained 31 and 41 quintal/hectares of maize for the ‘Low-CBT’ and ‘High-CBT’ groups, respectively, which are better than the baseline average 22 quintal/hectare for both groups. These findings underscore the relevance of CCBT, especially when the design principles of CBE are integrated well in the training programme (which was called ‘High-CBT level’), for improving performance, in this case gain in yield per hectare of smallholder farmers, which potentially results in the increase of household food security.</p>","PeriodicalId":46817,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Training and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijtd.12314","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of comprehensive competence-based training on competence development and performance improvement of smallholder farmers: An Ethiopian case study\",\"authors\":\"Chalachew Tarekegne,&nbsp;Renate Wesselink,&nbsp;Harm J. A. Biemans,&nbsp;Martin Mulder\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijtd.12314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Low yield/hectare gains, food insecurity and environmental unsustainability are challenges experienced by the agriculture sector in Ethiopia despite substantial government investment. Although there are many factors that contribute to the poor performance of the sector, smallholder farmer competence gaps are principal among them. This study aims to examine the effects of Comprehensive Competence-Based Training (CCBT) on the competence development and performance improvement of smallholder farmers using the authentic professional core task during maize planting as a problem context. We applied a 3-week randomized (control group pretest posttest) design and single-blind field experiment to test the impact of CCBT through provision of a training to two comparable farmer groups using conventional ‘Low-CBT’ and innovative ‘High-CBT’ implementation levels. The samples included ‘High-CBT’ (<i>N</i> = 220) and ‘Low-CBT’ (<i>N</i> = 220) groups of smallholder farmers in the West Gojjam Zone in Ethiopia. Data on competence development and performance improvement of farmers were collected from themselves, trainer Development Agents and Trained Assessors. The yield in quintal/hectare gains for each smallholder farmer was collected twice (before and after the intervention). Repeated (pretest, posttest) MANOVA and ANOVA measurements were used to analyze the data. The results revealed that the development of smallholder farmer competence in ‘High-CBT’ was higher than in ‘Low-CBT’ training. Comparisons of performance in both the authentic job situation and in terms of yield in quintal/hectare gains in the two groups revealed a better performance of both groups. However, the ‘High-CBT’ group performed better than the ‘Low-CBT’ group in both the authentic job situation and in terms of yield in quintal/hectare gains. We obtained 31 and 41 quintal/hectares of maize for the ‘Low-CBT’ and ‘High-CBT’ groups, respectively, which are better than the baseline average 22 quintal/hectare for both groups. These findings underscore the relevance of CCBT, especially when the design principles of CBE are integrated well in the training programme (which was called ‘High-CBT level’), for improving performance, in this case gain in yield per hectare of smallholder farmers, which potentially results in the increase of household food security.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Training and Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijtd.12314\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Training and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijtd.12314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Training and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijtd.12314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管政府投入了大量资金,但埃塞俄比亚农业部门仍面临着产量/公顷收益低、粮食不安全和环境不可持续等挑战。尽管导致农业部门表现不佳的因素有很多,但小农能力差距是其中最主要的因素。本研究旨在以玉米种植过程中的真实专业核心任务为问题背景,考察基于能力的综合培训(CCBT)对小农户能力发展和绩效提高的影响。我们采用了为期 3 周的随机(对照组前测后测)设计和单盲实地实验,通过向两个具有可比性的农民群体提供培训,分别采用传统的 "低能力本位培训 "和创新的 "高能力本位培训 "实施水平,测试了能力本位培训的影响。样本包括埃塞俄比亚西戈贾姆区的 "高-CBT"(N = 220)和 "低-CBT"(N = 220)小农群体。从农民本人、培训师发展代理和受训评估员处收集了有关农民能力发展和绩效提高的数据。以英担/公顷为单位,每个小农户的增产情况收集了两次(干预前和干预后)。数据分析采用了重复(前测、后测)MANOVA 和 ANOVA 测量方法。结果表明,"高-CBT "培训对小农户能力的培养高于 "低-CBT "培训。对两组学员在真实工作环境中的表现和以英担/公顷为单位的产量进行比较后发现,两组学员的表现都更好。然而,无论是在真实工作情境中,还是在以公担/公顷为单位的产量方面,"高成本效益测试 "组的表现都优于 "低成本效益测试 "组。我们发现,"低能力自评 "组和 "高能力自评 "组的玉米产量分别为 31 英担/公顷和 41 英担/公顷,高于两组平均 22 英担/公顷的基线产量。这些研究结果突出表明,能力建设与培训(CCBT),尤其是在培训计划(被称为 "高能力建 设与培训水平")中很好地融入了能力建设与培训(CBE)的设计原则时,对提高绩效(在本例中指 小农每公顷产量的增加)具有重要意义,这有可能导致家庭粮食安全的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The effects of comprehensive competence-based training on competence development and performance improvement of smallholder farmers: An Ethiopian case study

The effects of comprehensive competence-based training on competence development and performance improvement of smallholder farmers: An Ethiopian case study

Low yield/hectare gains, food insecurity and environmental unsustainability are challenges experienced by the agriculture sector in Ethiopia despite substantial government investment. Although there are many factors that contribute to the poor performance of the sector, smallholder farmer competence gaps are principal among them. This study aims to examine the effects of Comprehensive Competence-Based Training (CCBT) on the competence development and performance improvement of smallholder farmers using the authentic professional core task during maize planting as a problem context. We applied a 3-week randomized (control group pretest posttest) design and single-blind field experiment to test the impact of CCBT through provision of a training to two comparable farmer groups using conventional ‘Low-CBT’ and innovative ‘High-CBT’ implementation levels. The samples included ‘High-CBT’ (N = 220) and ‘Low-CBT’ (N = 220) groups of smallholder farmers in the West Gojjam Zone in Ethiopia. Data on competence development and performance improvement of farmers were collected from themselves, trainer Development Agents and Trained Assessors. The yield in quintal/hectare gains for each smallholder farmer was collected twice (before and after the intervention). Repeated (pretest, posttest) MANOVA and ANOVA measurements were used to analyze the data. The results revealed that the development of smallholder farmer competence in ‘High-CBT’ was higher than in ‘Low-CBT’ training. Comparisons of performance in both the authentic job situation and in terms of yield in quintal/hectare gains in the two groups revealed a better performance of both groups. However, the ‘High-CBT’ group performed better than the ‘Low-CBT’ group in both the authentic job situation and in terms of yield in quintal/hectare gains. We obtained 31 and 41 quintal/hectares of maize for the ‘Low-CBT’ and ‘High-CBT’ groups, respectively, which are better than the baseline average 22 quintal/hectare for both groups. These findings underscore the relevance of CCBT, especially when the design principles of CBE are integrated well in the training programme (which was called ‘High-CBT level’), for improving performance, in this case gain in yield per hectare of smallholder farmers, which potentially results in the increase of household food security.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Increasing international competition has led governments and corporations to focus on ways of improving national and corporate economic performance. The effective use of human resources is seen as a prerequisite, and the training and development of employees as paramount. The growth of training and development as an academic subject reflects its growth in practice. The International Journal of Training and Development is an international forum for the reporting of high-quality, original, empirical research. Multidisciplinary, international and comparative, the journal publishes research which ranges from the theoretical, conceptual and methodological to more policy-oriented types of work. The scope of the Journal is training and development, broadly defined. This includes: The determinants of training specifying and testing the explanatory variables which may be related to training identifying and analysing specific factors which give rise to a need for training and development as well as the processes by which those needs become defined, for example, training needs analysis the need for performance improvement the training and development implications of various performance improvement techniques, such as appraisal and assessment the analysis of competence Training and development practice the design, development and delivery of training the learning and development process itself competency-based approaches evaluation: the relationship between training and individual, corporate and macroeconomic performance Policy and strategy organisational aspects of training and development public policy issues questions of infrastructure issues relating to the training and development profession The Journal’s scope encompasses both corporate and public policy analysis. International and comparative work is particularly welcome, as is research which embraces emerging issues and developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信