{"title":"商品市场流动性的决定因素","authors":"Pankaj K. Jain, Ayla Kayhan, Esen Onur","doi":"10.1111/fire.12366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Using positions data for 18 commodity futures during 2001–2020, we examine systematic and idiosyncratic determinants of Amihud price impact and microstructure noise proxying for permanent and transitory components of commodity futures liquidity. Idiosyncratic factors have the largest economic impact: while excess hedging demand increases PI and noise, active position-taking (by market-makers) in excess of the hedging demand reduces noise. Systematic factors, including the lack of competition among liquidity providers, adversely impact liquidity, but this effect is mitigated if liquidity providers are well-capitalized. Supplementary leverage ratio (SLR) makes holding inventory costlier and is associated with lower liquidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47617,"journal":{"name":"FINANCIAL REVIEW","volume":"59 1","pages":"9-30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of commodity market liquidity\",\"authors\":\"Pankaj K. Jain, Ayla Kayhan, Esen Onur\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/fire.12366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Using positions data for 18 commodity futures during 2001–2020, we examine systematic and idiosyncratic determinants of Amihud price impact and microstructure noise proxying for permanent and transitory components of commodity futures liquidity. Idiosyncratic factors have the largest economic impact: while excess hedging demand increases PI and noise, active position-taking (by market-makers) in excess of the hedging demand reduces noise. Systematic factors, including the lack of competition among liquidity providers, adversely impact liquidity, but this effect is mitigated if liquidity providers are well-capitalized. Supplementary leverage ratio (SLR) makes holding inventory costlier and is associated with lower liquidity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FINANCIAL REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"9-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FINANCIAL REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fire.12366\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FINANCIAL REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fire.12366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
利用 2001-2020 年间 18 种商品期货的持仓数据,我们研究了 Amihud 价格影响的系统性决定因素和特异性决定因素,以及代表商品期货流动性永久性和暂时性组成部分的微观结构噪音。特异性因素对经济的影响最大:过量的套期保值需求会增加 PI 和噪音,而(做市商)超出套期保值需求的主动持仓则会减少噪音。系统性因素,包括流动性提供者之间缺乏竞争,会对流动性产生不利影响,但如果流动性提供者资本充足,这种影响就会减轻。补充杠杆比率(SLR)使持有存货的成本增加,与流动性降低有关。
Using positions data for 18 commodity futures during 2001–2020, we examine systematic and idiosyncratic determinants of Amihud price impact and microstructure noise proxying for permanent and transitory components of commodity futures liquidity. Idiosyncratic factors have the largest economic impact: while excess hedging demand increases PI and noise, active position-taking (by market-makers) in excess of the hedging demand reduces noise. Systematic factors, including the lack of competition among liquidity providers, adversely impact liquidity, but this effect is mitigated if liquidity providers are well-capitalized. Supplementary leverage ratio (SLR) makes holding inventory costlier and is associated with lower liquidity.