在比例代表制下,英国的政党制度会是什么样子?

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Thomas Quinn
{"title":"在比例代表制下,英国的政党制度会是什么样子?","authors":"Thomas Quinn","doi":"10.1111/1467-923x.13315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract British debates over electoral reform are invariably debates about what party system would emerge. While there is agreement that proportional representation (PR) would boost the size of existing smaller parties, there is no consensus over the emergence and prospering of new parties. The main weakness in the British debate concerns the types of governments that would form under PR. Some believe the Liberal Democrats would be perennial kingmakers. Others suggest that a ‘progressive alliance’ on the centre‐left would sweep all before it. This article considers the experience of west European multiparty systems since the 1980s and argues that party system fragmentation and the growth of non‐centrist parties would characterise Britain under PR. Moreover, the pattern of overlapping centrist coalitions seen in Germany and Benelux would be unlikely to emerge in Britain. Instead, a two‐bloc system, common in Scandinavia and southern Europe, would most likely develop.","PeriodicalId":47439,"journal":{"name":"Political Quarterly","volume":"160 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Would the British Party System Look Like under Proportional Representation?\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Quinn\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-923x.13315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract British debates over electoral reform are invariably debates about what party system would emerge. While there is agreement that proportional representation (PR) would boost the size of existing smaller parties, there is no consensus over the emergence and prospering of new parties. The main weakness in the British debate concerns the types of governments that would form under PR. Some believe the Liberal Democrats would be perennial kingmakers. Others suggest that a ‘progressive alliance’ on the centre‐left would sweep all before it. This article considers the experience of west European multiparty systems since the 1980s and argues that party system fragmentation and the growth of non‐centrist parties would characterise Britain under PR. Moreover, the pattern of overlapping centrist coalitions seen in Germany and Benelux would be unlikely to emerge in Britain. Instead, a two‐bloc system, common in Scandinavia and southern Europe, would most likely develop.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"160 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923x.13315\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923x.13315","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英国关于选举改革的辩论总是围绕着将会出现什么样的政党制度展开。虽然人们一致认为,比例代表制将扩大现有小政党的规模,但对新政党的出现和繁荣却没有达成共识。英国辩论的主要弱点在于,在脱欧后将组建什么样的政府。一些人认为,自由民主党(Liberal Democrats)将永远是决定国王的人。另一些人则认为,中左翼的“进步联盟”将大获全胜。本文考虑了自20世纪80年代以来西欧多党制的经验,并认为政党制度的分裂和非中间派政党的增长将成为PR下英国的特征。此外,在德国和比荷卢经济联盟中看到的重叠中间派联盟的模式不太可能出现在英国。相反,一个在斯堪的纳维亚半岛和南欧普遍存在的两大集团体系很可能会发展起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What Would the British Party System Look Like under Proportional Representation?
Abstract British debates over electoral reform are invariably debates about what party system would emerge. While there is agreement that proportional representation (PR) would boost the size of existing smaller parties, there is no consensus over the emergence and prospering of new parties. The main weakness in the British debate concerns the types of governments that would form under PR. Some believe the Liberal Democrats would be perennial kingmakers. Others suggest that a ‘progressive alliance’ on the centre‐left would sweep all before it. This article considers the experience of west European multiparty systems since the 1980s and argues that party system fragmentation and the growth of non‐centrist parties would characterise Britain under PR. Moreover, the pattern of overlapping centrist coalitions seen in Germany and Benelux would be unlikely to emerge in Britain. Instead, a two‐bloc system, common in Scandinavia and southern Europe, would most likely develop.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Political Quarterly
Political Quarterly POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
105
期刊介绍: Since its foundation in 1930, The Political Quarterly has explored and debated the key issues of the day. It is dedicated to political and social reform and has long acted as a conduit between policy-makers, commentators and academics. The Political Quarterly addresses current issues through serious and thought-provoking articles, written in clear jargon-free English."The Political Quarterly plays host to some of the best writing about both topical issues and underlying trends in UK and European politics"Professor Lord Raymond Plant
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信