季节变化的概念似乎不影响产前诊断率不分离。

Fetal therapy Pub Date : 1989-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000263451
A Drugan, S F Bottoms, M P Johnson, M I Evans
{"title":"季节变化的概念似乎不影响产前诊断率不分离。","authors":"A Drugan,&nbsp;S F Bottoms,&nbsp;M P Johnson,&nbsp;M I Evans","doi":"10.1159/000263451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A seasonal effect on ovulation patterns and conception rates is well documented in animal studies. The etiology of reported variation in human fertility is, however, uncertain. Abnormal ovulation has been implicated in the etiology of aneuploid conceptions, many of which abort spontaneously. To investigate the possibility that the frequency of aneuploidy reflects seasonal variation in ovulation patterns, we analyzed 5,292 consecutive prenatal karyotypes obtained from 1985 to 1987. Karyotypes were logged according to month and year of conception. Results were evaluated for cyclicity using frequency spectrum and time series analysis. Variation in the number of prenatal diagnostic procedures corresponded to known peaks in conception and delivery rates. No significant monthly or quarterly trend in the total rate of trisomies or in the rate of trisomy 21 was demonstrated. Although the sample size in this study may not be adequate to detect minor effects, seasonal variation does not appear to be a major determinant of nondisjunction rates in the population referred for prenatal diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":77713,"journal":{"name":"Fetal therapy","volume":"4 4","pages":"195-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000263451","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seasonal variation in conception does not appear to influence the rate of prenatal diagnosis of nondisjunction.\",\"authors\":\"A Drugan,&nbsp;S F Bottoms,&nbsp;M P Johnson,&nbsp;M I Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000263451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A seasonal effect on ovulation patterns and conception rates is well documented in animal studies. The etiology of reported variation in human fertility is, however, uncertain. Abnormal ovulation has been implicated in the etiology of aneuploid conceptions, many of which abort spontaneously. To investigate the possibility that the frequency of aneuploidy reflects seasonal variation in ovulation patterns, we analyzed 5,292 consecutive prenatal karyotypes obtained from 1985 to 1987. Karyotypes were logged according to month and year of conception. Results were evaluated for cyclicity using frequency spectrum and time series analysis. Variation in the number of prenatal diagnostic procedures corresponded to known peaks in conception and delivery rates. No significant monthly or quarterly trend in the total rate of trisomies or in the rate of trisomy 21 was demonstrated. Although the sample size in this study may not be adequate to detect minor effects, seasonal variation does not appear to be a major determinant of nondisjunction rates in the population referred for prenatal diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fetal therapy\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"195-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000263451\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fetal therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000263451\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fetal therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000263451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

季节性对排卵模式和受孕率的影响在动物研究中得到了充分的证明。然而,所报道的人类生育能力变异的病因尚不确定。异常排卵与非整倍体受孕的病因有关,其中许多是自发流产的。为了研究非整倍体频率反映排卵模式季节性变化的可能性,我们分析了1985年至1987年连续获得的5292个产前核型。根据受孕月份和年份记录核型。使用频谱和时间序列分析评估结果的周期性。产前诊断程序数量的变化与已知的受孕率和分娩率高峰相对应。在三体的总发病率或21三体的发病率方面没有明显的月度或季度趋势。虽然本研究的样本量可能不足以检测到轻微的影响,但季节性变化似乎并不是产前诊断人群中不分离率的主要决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seasonal variation in conception does not appear to influence the rate of prenatal diagnosis of nondisjunction.

A seasonal effect on ovulation patterns and conception rates is well documented in animal studies. The etiology of reported variation in human fertility is, however, uncertain. Abnormal ovulation has been implicated in the etiology of aneuploid conceptions, many of which abort spontaneously. To investigate the possibility that the frequency of aneuploidy reflects seasonal variation in ovulation patterns, we analyzed 5,292 consecutive prenatal karyotypes obtained from 1985 to 1987. Karyotypes were logged according to month and year of conception. Results were evaluated for cyclicity using frequency spectrum and time series analysis. Variation in the number of prenatal diagnostic procedures corresponded to known peaks in conception and delivery rates. No significant monthly or quarterly trend in the total rate of trisomies or in the rate of trisomy 21 was demonstrated. Although the sample size in this study may not be adequate to detect minor effects, seasonal variation does not appear to be a major determinant of nondisjunction rates in the population referred for prenatal diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信