加纳Amansie西区矿区表层土壤重金属污染

Akua Osaa Awuah, Boateng Kyereh
{"title":"加纳Amansie西区矿区表层土壤重金属污染","authors":"Akua Osaa Awuah, Boateng Kyereh","doi":"10.1080/15320383.2023.2260897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis study was conducted in five randomly selected small-scale mining communities in the Amansie West District of Ashanti Region, Ghana to assess the impacts of small-scale mining activities on heavy metal presence in three different land use types (mined site, farmland and forest area). Using a random sampling design, a total of 60 soil samples were collected from 0–20 cm depth and analyzed for soil heavy metals: arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg) and copper (Cu) using Two-way ANOVA. Heavy metal concentrations for As (5.571 mg/kg), Cd (0.002 mg/kg), Cu (1.158 mg/kg), Pb (0.076 mg/kg) in the communities did not exceed the FAO/WHO permissible limits with the exception of Hg concentrations for the respective communities (0.68 mg/kg, 1.07 mg/kg, 1.26 mg/kg, 1.28 mg/kg, 17.03 mg/kg) whose levels were 2.3 to 56.8 times higher than FAO/WHO permissible limits (0.3 mg/kg). The distribution of heavy metals in the soil was not uniform across the different land use types in the mining landscape. Differences in heavy metal concentrations were significant (p < .05) at the community, land use and their interaction (community*land use) levels with the exception of As concentration at the land use level (p > .05). The study concludes that soils of the major land use types in the study area (mined sites, farmlands and forest area) are all contaminated by Hg accumulation. Therefore, effective rehabilitation of mined sites in mining-plagued-communities should include measures for removing mercury from the soil.KEYWORDS: Miningsoilland use typesheavy metalsmercuryrehabilitation AcknowledgmentsThis study forms part of a larger study, “Securing Food and Ecosystem services in Mining plagued regions of Ghana” (NORAD SEFEM Project) which examines how land use can be diversified and harmonized in mining communities in Ghana. The authors are grateful to the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD) for funding this research. We also express our appreciation to Tropenbos Ghana for their cooperation and support in making this research possible.Data availability statementData will be made available upon request.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Author’s contributionAll authors contributed to the conception of the study, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting and revising of manuscript for publication.Additional informationFundingThis research work was funded by the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD) under the Grant number (RAF-3058, GHA18/0002).","PeriodicalId":21865,"journal":{"name":"Soil and Sediment Contamination: An International Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heavy Metal Contamination in Topsoil in Mining-Plagued Communities in the Amansie West District, Ghana\",\"authors\":\"Akua Osaa Awuah, Boateng Kyereh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15320383.2023.2260897\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis study was conducted in five randomly selected small-scale mining communities in the Amansie West District of Ashanti Region, Ghana to assess the impacts of small-scale mining activities on heavy metal presence in three different land use types (mined site, farmland and forest area). Using a random sampling design, a total of 60 soil samples were collected from 0–20 cm depth and analyzed for soil heavy metals: arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg) and copper (Cu) using Two-way ANOVA. Heavy metal concentrations for As (5.571 mg/kg), Cd (0.002 mg/kg), Cu (1.158 mg/kg), Pb (0.076 mg/kg) in the communities did not exceed the FAO/WHO permissible limits with the exception of Hg concentrations for the respective communities (0.68 mg/kg, 1.07 mg/kg, 1.26 mg/kg, 1.28 mg/kg, 17.03 mg/kg) whose levels were 2.3 to 56.8 times higher than FAO/WHO permissible limits (0.3 mg/kg). The distribution of heavy metals in the soil was not uniform across the different land use types in the mining landscape. Differences in heavy metal concentrations were significant (p < .05) at the community, land use and their interaction (community*land use) levels with the exception of As concentration at the land use level (p > .05). The study concludes that soils of the major land use types in the study area (mined sites, farmlands and forest area) are all contaminated by Hg accumulation. Therefore, effective rehabilitation of mined sites in mining-plagued-communities should include measures for removing mercury from the soil.KEYWORDS: Miningsoilland use typesheavy metalsmercuryrehabilitation AcknowledgmentsThis study forms part of a larger study, “Securing Food and Ecosystem services in Mining plagued regions of Ghana” (NORAD SEFEM Project) which examines how land use can be diversified and harmonized in mining communities in Ghana. The authors are grateful to the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD) for funding this research. We also express our appreciation to Tropenbos Ghana for their cooperation and support in making this research possible.Data availability statementData will be made available upon request.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Author’s contributionAll authors contributed to the conception of the study, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting and revising of manuscript for publication.Additional informationFundingThis research work was funded by the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD) under the Grant number (RAF-3058, GHA18/0002).\",\"PeriodicalId\":21865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil and Sediment Contamination: An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil and Sediment Contamination: An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2023.2260897\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil and Sediment Contamination: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2023.2260897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究在加纳阿散蒂地区Amansie West地区随机选取5个小型采矿社区,评估了三种不同土地利用类型(矿区、农田和林地)的小规模采矿活动对重金属存在的影响。采用随机抽样设计,收集60个0 ~ 20 cm深度土壤样品,采用双向方差分析分析土壤重金属:砷(As)、镉(Cd)、铅(Pb)、汞(Hg)和铜(Cu)。各社区砷(5.571 mg/kg)、镉(0.002 mg/kg)、铜(1.158 mg/kg)、铅(0.076 mg/kg)重金属浓度均未超过粮农组织/世界卫生组织允许限值,但各社区汞浓度(0.68 mg/kg、1.07 mg/kg、1.26 mg/kg、1.28 mg/kg、17.03 mg/kg)高于粮农组织/世界卫生组织允许限值(0.3 mg/kg) 2.3至56.8倍。矿区不同土地利用类型土壤重金属含量分布不均匀。群落、土地利用及其交互作用(群落*土地利用)水平上重金属浓度差异显著(p < 0.05),但土地利用水平上As浓度差异显著(p > 0.05)。研究表明,研究区主要土地利用类型(矿区、农田和林区)土壤均存在汞积累污染。因此,在受采矿困扰的社区有效地恢复矿区应包括从土壤中去除汞的措施。本研究是一项更大的研究的一部分,“确保加纳采矿困扰地区的粮食和生态系统服务”(NORAD SEFEM项目),该项目研究了加纳采矿社区如何实现土地利用的多样化和协调。作者感谢挪威发展合作署(NORAD)对这项研究的资助。我们也感谢Tropenbos Ghana在使这项研究成为可能方面的合作和支持。数据可用性声明数据可应要求提供。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。作者的贡献所有作者都参与了研究的构思、数据收集、数据分析和解释、稿件的起草和修改以供发表。本研究工作由挪威发展合作署(NORAD)资助,授权号(RAF-3058, GHA18/0002)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Heavy Metal Contamination in Topsoil in Mining-Plagued Communities in the Amansie West District, Ghana
ABSTRACTThis study was conducted in five randomly selected small-scale mining communities in the Amansie West District of Ashanti Region, Ghana to assess the impacts of small-scale mining activities on heavy metal presence in three different land use types (mined site, farmland and forest area). Using a random sampling design, a total of 60 soil samples were collected from 0–20 cm depth and analyzed for soil heavy metals: arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg) and copper (Cu) using Two-way ANOVA. Heavy metal concentrations for As (5.571 mg/kg), Cd (0.002 mg/kg), Cu (1.158 mg/kg), Pb (0.076 mg/kg) in the communities did not exceed the FAO/WHO permissible limits with the exception of Hg concentrations for the respective communities (0.68 mg/kg, 1.07 mg/kg, 1.26 mg/kg, 1.28 mg/kg, 17.03 mg/kg) whose levels were 2.3 to 56.8 times higher than FAO/WHO permissible limits (0.3 mg/kg). The distribution of heavy metals in the soil was not uniform across the different land use types in the mining landscape. Differences in heavy metal concentrations were significant (p < .05) at the community, land use and their interaction (community*land use) levels with the exception of As concentration at the land use level (p > .05). The study concludes that soils of the major land use types in the study area (mined sites, farmlands and forest area) are all contaminated by Hg accumulation. Therefore, effective rehabilitation of mined sites in mining-plagued-communities should include measures for removing mercury from the soil.KEYWORDS: Miningsoilland use typesheavy metalsmercuryrehabilitation AcknowledgmentsThis study forms part of a larger study, “Securing Food and Ecosystem services in Mining plagued regions of Ghana” (NORAD SEFEM Project) which examines how land use can be diversified and harmonized in mining communities in Ghana. The authors are grateful to the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD) for funding this research. We also express our appreciation to Tropenbos Ghana for their cooperation and support in making this research possible.Data availability statementData will be made available upon request.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Author’s contributionAll authors contributed to the conception of the study, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting and revising of manuscript for publication.Additional informationFundingThis research work was funded by the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD) under the Grant number (RAF-3058, GHA18/0002).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信