旅游与建筑环境研究综述:如果你不喜欢元分析，试试元回归分析吧!

IF 2.8 3区经济学 Q2 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING

Journal of Planning Education and Research Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1177/0739456x231197382

Mark R. Stevens

{"title":"旅游与建筑环境研究综述:如果你不喜欢元分析，试试元回归分析吧!","authors":"Mark R. Stevens","doi":"10.1177/0739456x231197382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this Commentary, I respond to a Commentary by Petter Næss that critiques the use of meta-analysis for reviewing the literature on travel and the built environment. I describe how each of Næss’s four challenges to the use of meta-analysis can be at least partially resolved through the use of meta-regression analysis instead. I also note important limitations of the literature review method that Næss recommends as an alternative to meta-analysis. While meta-regression is not a perfect method, I argue that it offers valuable features for understanding planning research that literature review and meta-analysis do not.","PeriodicalId":16793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Planning Education and Research","volume":"345 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reviewing Research on Travel and the Built Environment: If You Don’t Like Meta-analysis, Try Meta-regression Analysis Instead!\",\"authors\":\"Mark R. Stevens\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0739456x231197382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this Commentary, I respond to a Commentary by Petter Næss that critiques the use of meta-analysis for reviewing the literature on travel and the built environment. I describe how each of Næss’s four challenges to the use of meta-analysis can be at least partially resolved through the use of meta-regression analysis instead. I also note important limitations of the literature review method that Næss recommends as an alternative to meta-analysis. While meta-regression is not a perfect method, I argue that it offers valuable features for understanding planning research that literature review and meta-analysis do not.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Planning Education and Research\",\"volume\":\"345 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Planning Education and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x231197382\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Planning Education and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x231197382","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇评论中，我对Petter Næss的一篇评论进行了回应，该评论批评使用元分析来回顾关于旅行和建筑环境的文献。我描述了Næss对使用元分析的四个挑战如何至少部分地通过使用元回归分析来解决。我还注意到Næss推荐的文献回顾方法作为元分析的替代方法的重要局限性。虽然元回归不是一种完美的方法，但我认为它为理解规划研究提供了文献回顾和元分析所没有的有价值的特征。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Reviewing Research on Travel and the Built Environment: If You Don’t Like Meta-analysis, Try Meta-regression Analysis Instead!

In this Commentary, I respond to a Commentary by Petter Næss that critiques the use of meta-analysis for reviewing the literature on travel and the built environment. I describe how each of Næss’s four challenges to the use of meta-analysis can be at least partially resolved through the use of meta-regression analysis instead. I also note important limitations of the literature review method that Næss recommends as an alternative to meta-analysis. While meta-regression is not a perfect method, I argue that it offers valuable features for understanding planning research that literature review and meta-analysis do not.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Planning Education and Research Multiple-

CiteScore

7.40

自引率

4.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Planning Education and Research (JPER) is a forum for planning educators and scholars (from both academia and practice) to present results from teaching and research that advance the profession and improve planning practice. JPER is the official journal of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning (ACSP) and the journal of record for North American planning scholarship. Aimed at scholars and educators in urban and regional planning, political science, policy analysis, urban geography, economics, and sociology, JPER presents the most vital contemporary trends and issues in planning theory, practice, and pedagogy.