公共关系战略:理解公共关系战略行为的理论框架

IF 4.4 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Rickard Andersson
{"title":"公共关系战略:理解公共关系战略行为的理论框架","authors":"Rickard Andersson","doi":"10.1080/1062726x.2023.2259523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Strategy is considered one of the most central concepts in public relations research and practice. However, public relations strategizing, i.e., the doing of strategy, remains a black-box concept in public relations and would benefit from additional approaches to theorizing strategy. This conceptual article draws upon strategy-as-practice, practice theory, and the existentialist notion of human modes of being and articulates a theoretical framework describing four modes of strategizing in public relations: (1) absorbed strategizing, (2) deliberate strategizing, (3) deliberative strategizing and (4) abstract strategizing. The first three modes are conceptualized as immersed modes of strategizing in everyday activities, while the fourth is conceptualized as a detached mode of strategizing in strategic planning activities. Then, it draws upon Mintzberg and Waters’ (1984) five types of strategy and situates the four modes of public relations strategizing in strategy formation and realization. The article thereby contributes to theorizing strategy and strategizing in public relations by offering researchers a theoretical framework for researching strategizing in public relations.","PeriodicalId":47737,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Relations Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public Relations Strategizing: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding the Doing of Strategy in Public Relations\",\"authors\":\"Rickard Andersson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1062726x.2023.2259523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Strategy is considered one of the most central concepts in public relations research and practice. However, public relations strategizing, i.e., the doing of strategy, remains a black-box concept in public relations and would benefit from additional approaches to theorizing strategy. This conceptual article draws upon strategy-as-practice, practice theory, and the existentialist notion of human modes of being and articulates a theoretical framework describing four modes of strategizing in public relations: (1) absorbed strategizing, (2) deliberate strategizing, (3) deliberative strategizing and (4) abstract strategizing. The first three modes are conceptualized as immersed modes of strategizing in everyday activities, while the fourth is conceptualized as a detached mode of strategizing in strategic planning activities. Then, it draws upon Mintzberg and Waters’ (1984) five types of strategy and situates the four modes of public relations strategizing in strategy formation and realization. The article thereby contributes to theorizing strategy and strategizing in public relations by offering researchers a theoretical framework for researching strategizing in public relations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Relations Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Relations Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726x.2023.2259523\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Relations Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726x.2023.2259523","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

战略被认为是公共关系研究和实践中最核心的概念之一。然而,公共关系战略,即战略的实施,仍然是公共关系中的一个黑箱概念,并且将受益于将战略理论化的其他方法。这篇概念性的文章借鉴了战略作为实践、实践理论和人类存在模式的存在主义概念,并阐述了一个理论框架,描述了公共关系中的四种战略模式:(1)吸收战略,(2)深思熟虑战略,(3)深思熟虑战略和(4)抽象战略。前三种模式被概念化为日常活动中的沉浸式战略制定模式,而第四种模式被概念化为战略规划活动中的分离式战略制定模式。然后,借鉴明茨伯格和沃特斯(1984)的五种战略类型,将公共关系战略的四种模式定位于战略的形成和实现。本文为研究公共关系中的战略提供了一个理论框架,从而有助于将战略和公共关系中的战略理论化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public Relations Strategizing: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding the Doing of Strategy in Public Relations
Strategy is considered one of the most central concepts in public relations research and practice. However, public relations strategizing, i.e., the doing of strategy, remains a black-box concept in public relations and would benefit from additional approaches to theorizing strategy. This conceptual article draws upon strategy-as-practice, practice theory, and the existentialist notion of human modes of being and articulates a theoretical framework describing four modes of strategizing in public relations: (1) absorbed strategizing, (2) deliberate strategizing, (3) deliberative strategizing and (4) abstract strategizing. The first three modes are conceptualized as immersed modes of strategizing in everyday activities, while the fourth is conceptualized as a detached mode of strategizing in strategic planning activities. Then, it draws upon Mintzberg and Waters’ (1984) five types of strategy and situates the four modes of public relations strategizing in strategy formation and realization. The article thereby contributes to theorizing strategy and strategizing in public relations by offering researchers a theoretical framework for researching strategizing in public relations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信