生长肉牛日粮中添加保护瘤胃氨基酸对动物生产性能和肉品质的影响

IF 2.1 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Almudena Cabezas, Jesús De la Fuente, María Teresa Díaz, Rubén Bermejo-Poza, Diego Martínez del Olmo, Javier Mateos, Nuria Llanes, Vicente Jimeno
{"title":"生长肉牛日粮中添加保护瘤胃氨基酸对动物生产性能和肉品质的影响","authors":"Almudena Cabezas, Jesús De la Fuente, María Teresa Díaz, Rubén Bermejo-Poza, Diego Martínez del Olmo, Javier Mateos, Nuria Llanes, Vicente Jimeno","doi":"10.3389/fanim.2023.1269775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction This study investigated the impact of rumen-protected amino acids on beef cattle's growth, fattening performance, and meat quality. Methods Two groups of 40 Montbeliard steers (237.8 ± 30 kg body weight) were housed separately and fed, with mono-tunnel feeders, either a control diet (CON) or a diet containing rumen-protected lysine and methionine with 3% less crude protein (APR). Feed consumption and weight were tracked in all animals, and meat quality analysis focused on the longissimus muscle, with 10 steers randomly selected from each treatment. Results and discussion Results for overall performance revealed no significant differences in body weight, average daily gain (ADG), and concentrate conversion ratio between the CON and APR diets (p > 0.05). However, during the final 90 days of the trial, the APR group showed significantly higher ADG (p < 0.05) than the CON group, while the concentrate conversion ratio was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the CON group compared to the APR group. The hot carcass weight, dressing percentage, and carcass conformation did not differ significantly between the CON and APR diets (p > 0.05). There was a slight tendency (p = 0.06) for higher fatness score in the CON group. Regarding meat composition, the diet did not significantly affect proximate composition, but a tendency (p = 0.059) for higher crude protein content in APR cattle's meat compared to the CON group was observed. The APR meat showed slightly lower levels of C17:1 (0.56% vs. 0.72%) and C18:1n9 (31.7% vs. 34%). There was a tendency for C14:0 to be lower (P = 0.07), and for C16:0, C18:2 and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) to be greater in meat from cattle fed APR compared to CON. However, meat quality attributes like pH, water-holding capacity, color, and texture were similar in both CON and APR groups (p > 0.05). The findings indicate that utilizing rumen-protected amino acids enables formulating diets with reduced crude protein levels while enhancing nitrogen utilization efficiency for protein synthesis in intensively reared steers. Importantly, these dietary improvements do not adversely affect meat quality.","PeriodicalId":73064,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in animal science","volume":"196 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of the inclusion of rumen-protected amino acids in the diet of growing beef cattle on animal performance and meat quality\",\"authors\":\"Almudena Cabezas, Jesús De la Fuente, María Teresa Díaz, Rubén Bermejo-Poza, Diego Martínez del Olmo, Javier Mateos, Nuria Llanes, Vicente Jimeno\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fanim.2023.1269775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction This study investigated the impact of rumen-protected amino acids on beef cattle's growth, fattening performance, and meat quality. Methods Two groups of 40 Montbeliard steers (237.8 ± 30 kg body weight) were housed separately and fed, with mono-tunnel feeders, either a control diet (CON) or a diet containing rumen-protected lysine and methionine with 3% less crude protein (APR). Feed consumption and weight were tracked in all animals, and meat quality analysis focused on the longissimus muscle, with 10 steers randomly selected from each treatment. Results and discussion Results for overall performance revealed no significant differences in body weight, average daily gain (ADG), and concentrate conversion ratio between the CON and APR diets (p > 0.05). However, during the final 90 days of the trial, the APR group showed significantly higher ADG (p < 0.05) than the CON group, while the concentrate conversion ratio was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the CON group compared to the APR group. The hot carcass weight, dressing percentage, and carcass conformation did not differ significantly between the CON and APR diets (p > 0.05). There was a slight tendency (p = 0.06) for higher fatness score in the CON group. Regarding meat composition, the diet did not significantly affect proximate composition, but a tendency (p = 0.059) for higher crude protein content in APR cattle's meat compared to the CON group was observed. The APR meat showed slightly lower levels of C17:1 (0.56% vs. 0.72%) and C18:1n9 (31.7% vs. 34%). There was a tendency for C14:0 to be lower (P = 0.07), and for C16:0, C18:2 and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) to be greater in meat from cattle fed APR compared to CON. However, meat quality attributes like pH, water-holding capacity, color, and texture were similar in both CON and APR groups (p > 0.05). The findings indicate that utilizing rumen-protected amino acids enables formulating diets with reduced crude protein levels while enhancing nitrogen utilization efficiency for protein synthesis in intensively reared steers. Importantly, these dietary improvements do not adversely affect meat quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in animal science\",\"volume\":\"196 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in animal science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2023.1269775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in animal science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2023.1269775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨瘤胃保护氨基酸对肉牛生长、增肥性能和肉品质的影响。方法选取体重为237.8±30 kg的蒙白阉牛40头,采用单隧道饲养,分别饲喂对照饲粮(CON)和含保护瘤胃赖氨酸和蛋氨酸的饲粮(APR降低3%)。跟踪所有动物的饲料消耗和体重,并重点分析最长肌的肉质,从每个处理中随机选择10头阉牛。结果和讨论综合性能结果显示,CON和APR饲粮在体重、平均日增重(ADG)和精料转化率(p >0.05)。然而,在试验的最后90天,APR组的平均日增重(p <0.05),精料转化率显著高于对照组(p <CON组与APR组比较,差异无统计学意义(0.05)。CON和APR饲粮的热胴体重、屠宰率和胴体构象无显著差异(p >0.05)。CON组肥胖评分有轻微升高的趋势(p = 0.06)。在肉类成分方面,饲粮对APR牛的近似组成没有显著影响,但与CON组相比,APR牛的粗蛋白质含量有提高的趋势(p = 0.059)。APR肉品C17:1(0.56%比0.72%)和C18:1n9(31.7%比34%)含量略低。饲料中C14:0含量有较低的趋势(P = 0.07),饲料中C16:0、C18:2和多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFA)含量有较高的趋势。然而,饲料中pH值、保水能力、颜色和质地等肉质属性在饲料中与饲料中相似(P >0.05)。由此可见,在集约饲养的肉牛中,利用保护瘤胃的氨基酸可以降低饲粮的粗蛋白质水平,同时提高蛋白质合成中氮的利用效率。重要的是,这些饮食的改善不会对肉质产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of the inclusion of rumen-protected amino acids in the diet of growing beef cattle on animal performance and meat quality
Introduction This study investigated the impact of rumen-protected amino acids on beef cattle's growth, fattening performance, and meat quality. Methods Two groups of 40 Montbeliard steers (237.8 ± 30 kg body weight) were housed separately and fed, with mono-tunnel feeders, either a control diet (CON) or a diet containing rumen-protected lysine and methionine with 3% less crude protein (APR). Feed consumption and weight were tracked in all animals, and meat quality analysis focused on the longissimus muscle, with 10 steers randomly selected from each treatment. Results and discussion Results for overall performance revealed no significant differences in body weight, average daily gain (ADG), and concentrate conversion ratio between the CON and APR diets (p &gt; 0.05). However, during the final 90 days of the trial, the APR group showed significantly higher ADG (p &lt; 0.05) than the CON group, while the concentrate conversion ratio was significantly higher (p &lt; 0.05) in the CON group compared to the APR group. The hot carcass weight, dressing percentage, and carcass conformation did not differ significantly between the CON and APR diets (p &gt; 0.05). There was a slight tendency (p = 0.06) for higher fatness score in the CON group. Regarding meat composition, the diet did not significantly affect proximate composition, but a tendency (p = 0.059) for higher crude protein content in APR cattle's meat compared to the CON group was observed. The APR meat showed slightly lower levels of C17:1 (0.56% vs. 0.72%) and C18:1n9 (31.7% vs. 34%). There was a tendency for C14:0 to be lower (P = 0.07), and for C16:0, C18:2 and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) to be greater in meat from cattle fed APR compared to CON. However, meat quality attributes like pH, water-holding capacity, color, and texture were similar in both CON and APR groups (p &gt; 0.05). The findings indicate that utilizing rumen-protected amino acids enables formulating diets with reduced crude protein levels while enhancing nitrogen utilization efficiency for protein synthesis in intensively reared steers. Importantly, these dietary improvements do not adversely affect meat quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信