[声波振动仪器钻进能力的比较重量分析]。

P O Carli, G A Favero, D Longhin, M Morello
{"title":"[声波振动仪器钻进能力的比较重量分析]。","authors":"P O Carli,&nbsp;G A Favero,&nbsp;D Longhin,&nbsp;M Morello","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors compare by gravimetric analysis the quantity of dentin by four different types of endodontic instruments, with the sonic technique. The results show File-Diamond are the most efficient instruments, followed by Rispi-Sonic, File-K and Shaper.</p>","PeriodicalId":77721,"journal":{"name":"Giornale di stomatologia e di ortognatodonzia","volume":"8 2","pages":"67-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Comparative gravimetric analysis of the drilling capacity of sonic vibrating instruments].\",\"authors\":\"P O Carli,&nbsp;G A Favero,&nbsp;D Longhin,&nbsp;M Morello\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The authors compare by gravimetric analysis the quantity of dentin by four different types of endodontic instruments, with the sonic technique. The results show File-Diamond are the most efficient instruments, followed by Rispi-Sonic, File-K and Shaper.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Giornale di stomatologia e di ortognatodonzia\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"67-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Giornale di stomatologia e di ortognatodonzia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale di stomatologia e di ortognatodonzia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用重量分析法比较了四种不同牙髓治疗器械对牙本质质量的影响。结果表明,File-Diamond是最有效的工具,其次是Rispi-Sonic、File-K和Shaper。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Comparative gravimetric analysis of the drilling capacity of sonic vibrating instruments].

The authors compare by gravimetric analysis the quantity of dentin by four different types of endodontic instruments, with the sonic technique. The results show File-Diamond are the most efficient instruments, followed by Rispi-Sonic, File-K and Shaper.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信