论Márkus的新马克思主义语言哲学

IF 1 Q3 SOCIOLOGY

Thesis Eleven Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1177/07255136231199786

Shuai Shao

{"title":"论Márkus的新马克思主义语言哲学","authors":"Shuai Shao","doi":"10.1177/07255136231199786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article elucidates Márkus’ new Marxist philosophy of language based on his critique of the paradigm of language represented by Popper, Wittgenstein, Lévi-Strauss, and Gadamer. His critique suggests that instrumental rationality, pure reason, alienated reason, and objective and idealistic rationality of the paradigm of language are elements that should be overcome. From his critical perspective, value rationality, practical reason, personal reason, and historical materialism are advocated instead. He not only critically develops the philosophy of language but also adds new levels of meaning to Marxism.","PeriodicalId":54188,"journal":{"name":"Thesis Eleven","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Márkus’ new Marxist philosophy of language\",\"authors\":\"Shuai Shao\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07255136231199786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article elucidates Márkus’ new Marxist philosophy of language based on his critique of the paradigm of language represented by Popper, Wittgenstein, Lévi-Strauss, and Gadamer. His critique suggests that instrumental rationality, pure reason, alienated reason, and objective and idealistic rationality of the paradigm of language are elements that should be overcome. From his critical perspective, value rationality, practical reason, personal reason, and historical materialism are advocated instead. He not only critically develops the philosophy of language but also adds new levels of meaning to Marxism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thesis Eleven\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thesis Eleven\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136231199786\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thesis Eleven","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136231199786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从Márkus对以波普尔、维特根斯坦、斯特劳斯和伽达默尔为代表的语言范式的批判出发，阐述了他的新马克思主义语言哲学。他的批判指出，工具理性、纯粹理性、异化理性以及语言范式的客观理性和唯心理性都是需要克服的因素。在他的批判视野中，取而代之的是价值理性、实践理性、个人理性和历史唯物主义。他不仅批判性地发展了语言哲学，而且使马克思主义的意义增加了新的层次。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

On Márkus’ new Marxist philosophy of language

This article elucidates Márkus’ new Marxist philosophy of language based on his critique of the paradigm of language represented by Popper, Wittgenstein, Lévi-Strauss, and Gadamer. His critique suggests that instrumental rationality, pure reason, alienated reason, and objective and idealistic rationality of the paradigm of language are elements that should be overcome. From his critical perspective, value rationality, practical reason, personal reason, and historical materialism are advocated instead. He not only critically develops the philosophy of language but also adds new levels of meaning to Marxism.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Thesis Eleven SOCIOLOGY-

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Established in 1996 Thesis Eleven is a truly international and interdisciplinary peer reviewed journal. Innovative and authorative the journal encourages the development of social theory in the broadest sense by consistently producing articles, reviews and debate with a central focus on theories of society, culture, and politics and the understanding of modernity. The purpose of this journal is to encourage the development of social theory in the broadest sense. We view social theory as both multidisciplinary and plural, reaching across social sciences and liberal arts and cultivating a diversity of critical theories of modernity across both the German and French senses of critical theory.