{"title":"康复,身份,抵抗:探索物质使用耻辱在农村安大略省","authors":"Sandra R. McNeil","doi":"10.1080/10428232.2023.2259781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTAlthough much attention focuses on mental health recovery and stigma, less attention is paid to substance use especially in rural areas. This qualitative study draws on Foucauldian and intersectional approaches to examine the sociocultural processes by which stigmatized identities are constructed and rejected at micro and macro levels. A thematic analysis is applied to 40 interviews with people with substance use issues in two rural communities. Findings illustrate that stigma is constructed through binary identity categories and intersectional identities rooted in neoliberal contexts. Resistance is demonstrated at personal, peer, public, and structural levels, offering counter narratives of strength and resilience.KEYWORDS: Recoverystigmasubstance useresistancerural Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementData available on request due to privacy/ethical restrictionsEthics approvalThis work was approved on November 21, 2018 by the University of Toronto Research Ethics Board for Human Participants. RIS Human Protocol Number 36,833 and Protocol #11319.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada under Grant 752-2016-1135.","PeriodicalId":44255,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Progressive Human Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recovery, Identity, Resistance: Exploring Substance Use Stigma in Rural Ontario\",\"authors\":\"Sandra R. McNeil\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10428232.2023.2259781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTAlthough much attention focuses on mental health recovery and stigma, less attention is paid to substance use especially in rural areas. This qualitative study draws on Foucauldian and intersectional approaches to examine the sociocultural processes by which stigmatized identities are constructed and rejected at micro and macro levels. A thematic analysis is applied to 40 interviews with people with substance use issues in two rural communities. Findings illustrate that stigma is constructed through binary identity categories and intersectional identities rooted in neoliberal contexts. Resistance is demonstrated at personal, peer, public, and structural levels, offering counter narratives of strength and resilience.KEYWORDS: Recoverystigmasubstance useresistancerural Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementData available on request due to privacy/ethical restrictionsEthics approvalThis work was approved on November 21, 2018 by the University of Toronto Research Ethics Board for Human Participants. RIS Human Protocol Number 36,833 and Protocol #11319.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada under Grant 752-2016-1135.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Progressive Human Services\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Progressive Human Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428232.2023.2259781\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Progressive Human Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428232.2023.2259781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
Recovery, Identity, Resistance: Exploring Substance Use Stigma in Rural Ontario
ABSTRACTAlthough much attention focuses on mental health recovery and stigma, less attention is paid to substance use especially in rural areas. This qualitative study draws on Foucauldian and intersectional approaches to examine the sociocultural processes by which stigmatized identities are constructed and rejected at micro and macro levels. A thematic analysis is applied to 40 interviews with people with substance use issues in two rural communities. Findings illustrate that stigma is constructed through binary identity categories and intersectional identities rooted in neoliberal contexts. Resistance is demonstrated at personal, peer, public, and structural levels, offering counter narratives of strength and resilience.KEYWORDS: Recoverystigmasubstance useresistancerural Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementData available on request due to privacy/ethical restrictionsEthics approvalThis work was approved on November 21, 2018 by the University of Toronto Research Ethics Board for Human Participants. RIS Human Protocol Number 36,833 and Protocol #11319.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada under Grant 752-2016-1135.
期刊介绍:
The only journal of its kind in the United States, the Journal of Progressive Human Services covers political, social, personal, and professional problems in human services from a progressive perspective. The journal stimulates debate about major social issues and contributes to the development of the analytical tools needed for building a caring society based on equality and justice. The journal"s contributors examine oppressed and vulnerable groups, struggles by workers and clients on the job and in the community, dilemmas of practice in conservative contexts, and strategies for ending racism, sexism, ageism, heterosexism, and discrimination of persons who are disabled and psychologically distressed.