对测试用例进行优先级排序,以改进使用MCDM方法的软件故障检测

Q4 Mathematics
Maryam Mohammadi Sarpiri, Keyvan Mohebbi, Ali Jamshidi
{"title":"对测试用例进行优先级排序,以改进使用MCDM方法的软件故障检测","authors":"Maryam Mohammadi Sarpiri, Keyvan Mohebbi, Ali Jamshidi","doi":"10.1504/ijica.2023.134206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To decrease the cost of software testing, we can run a subset of test cases, but this may result in residual faults. To keep the efficiency of testing, the most important test cases should be selected through a prioritisation approach. Such prioritisation requires the assessment of different criteria, so it can be formulated as a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. This research proposes an approach to select the proper subset of test cases using the MCDM methods. Three MCDM methods, namely, fuzzy SAW, fuzzy VIKOR, and fuzzy TOPSIS are applied to prioritise the test cases concerning various criteria. To select a subset of test cases, a threshold is determined for different pairs of the most important criteria. The proposed approach is applied to an actual e-government software system with two variants. The experimental evaluations indicate the efficiency of this approach with respect to both the failure rate and the average percentage of fault detection metrics.","PeriodicalId":39390,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovative Computing and Applications","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prioritising test cases to improve the software fault detection using MCDM methods\",\"authors\":\"Maryam Mohammadi Sarpiri, Keyvan Mohebbi, Ali Jamshidi\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/ijica.2023.134206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To decrease the cost of software testing, we can run a subset of test cases, but this may result in residual faults. To keep the efficiency of testing, the most important test cases should be selected through a prioritisation approach. Such prioritisation requires the assessment of different criteria, so it can be formulated as a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. This research proposes an approach to select the proper subset of test cases using the MCDM methods. Three MCDM methods, namely, fuzzy SAW, fuzzy VIKOR, and fuzzy TOPSIS are applied to prioritise the test cases concerning various criteria. To select a subset of test cases, a threshold is determined for different pairs of the most important criteria. The proposed approach is applied to an actual e-government software system with two variants. The experimental evaluations indicate the efficiency of this approach with respect to both the failure rate and the average percentage of fault detection metrics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Innovative Computing and Applications\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Innovative Computing and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijica.2023.134206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovative Computing and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijica.2023.134206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了减少软件测试的成本,我们可以运行测试用例的子集,但是这可能会导致残留的错误。为了保持测试的效率,应该通过优先级方法来选择最重要的测试用例。这种优先排序需要评估不同的标准,因此可以将其表述为多标准决策(MCDM)问题。本研究提出了一种使用MCDM方法选择测试用例的适当子集的方法。应用模糊SAW、模糊VIKOR和模糊TOPSIS三种MCDM方法对不同标准的测试用例进行优先级排序。为了选择测试用例的子集,需要为最重要的标准的不同对确定一个阈值。将该方法应用于一个具有两个变体的实际电子政务软件系统。实验结果表明,该方法在故障检测指标的失败率和平均百分比方面都是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prioritising test cases to improve the software fault detection using MCDM methods
To decrease the cost of software testing, we can run a subset of test cases, but this may result in residual faults. To keep the efficiency of testing, the most important test cases should be selected through a prioritisation approach. Such prioritisation requires the assessment of different criteria, so it can be formulated as a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. This research proposes an approach to select the proper subset of test cases using the MCDM methods. Three MCDM methods, namely, fuzzy SAW, fuzzy VIKOR, and fuzzy TOPSIS are applied to prioritise the test cases concerning various criteria. To select a subset of test cases, a threshold is determined for different pairs of the most important criteria. The proposed approach is applied to an actual e-government software system with two variants. The experimental evaluations indicate the efficiency of this approach with respect to both the failure rate and the average percentage of fault detection metrics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: IJICA proposes and fosters discussion on all new computing paradigms and corresponding applications to solve real-world problems. It will cover all aspects related to evolutionary computation, quantum-inspired computing, swarm-based computing, neuro-computing, DNA computing and fuzzy computing, as well as other new computing paradigms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信