潘与灰狼之间:酒神变奏曲

Ilya V. Kuznetsov
{"title":"潘与灰狼之间:酒神变奏曲","authors":"Ilya V. Kuznetsov","doi":"10.25205/2713-3133-2023-2-91-99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mariam Petrosyan’s novel “The House in which ...” uses a model of two worlds and involves several teenage trickster heroes who can go into another reality called “The Forest”, as well as take other children there. The paradigm for such a plot structure in European literature aimed at children and adolescents is D. Barry’s book “Peter Pan”. Her hero is correlated with a pagan Pan, and he takes boys from ordinary families to his island. Peter Pan does not want to grow up and does not know love; the children he takes away must be cheerful and heartless. The immobile time on Peter Pan Island and the lack of love there contrast this world with Christian culture, but they bring it closer to the pagan – Dionysian world, in the words of F. Nietzsche. This construction proved to be very fruitful in the European mass literature of the 20th and 21st centuries. However, in Mariam Petrosyan’s novel, in contrast to this literature, the images of tricksters are not cultivated. They preserve and show the werewolf, dark, dangerous nature. This interpretation of the trickster is connected with the specifics of the Russian literary tradition. Since the time of Romanticism, which established the model of two worlds, the other world in this tradition was usually presented as hostile to man. In the modern era, the two-world model has regained its validity. This was largely due to the fact that the aesthetics of Russian modernism adopted the Nietzschean concept of Dionysianism, specifically interpreted as an appeal to soil culture. However, on the part of traditionally thinking writers, such pochvennichestvo met with rejection. He was criticized by Ivan Bunin, in the story “Sukhodol”, contrasting Christianity with him as the only mechanism for preserving cultural memory. In the 21st century, in the stories of Elena Chizhova, Irina Bogatyreva, Evgenia Nekrasova, the model of two worlds with an appeal to soil culture was again actualized. The characters of the other world were depicted in them as assistants to the heroes, but at the same time unsafe and alien creatures. This interpretation of the trickster is close to the image of a magical assistant in a fairy tale. It was she who was realized in the novel by Mariam Petrosyan.","PeriodicalId":493916,"journal":{"name":"Сюжетология и сюжетография","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between Pan and the Gray Wolf: Dionysian Variations\",\"authors\":\"Ilya V. Kuznetsov\",\"doi\":\"10.25205/2713-3133-2023-2-91-99\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mariam Petrosyan’s novel “The House in which ...” uses a model of two worlds and involves several teenage trickster heroes who can go into another reality called “The Forest”, as well as take other children there. The paradigm for such a plot structure in European literature aimed at children and adolescents is D. Barry’s book “Peter Pan”. Her hero is correlated with a pagan Pan, and he takes boys from ordinary families to his island. Peter Pan does not want to grow up and does not know love; the children he takes away must be cheerful and heartless. The immobile time on Peter Pan Island and the lack of love there contrast this world with Christian culture, but they bring it closer to the pagan – Dionysian world, in the words of F. Nietzsche. This construction proved to be very fruitful in the European mass literature of the 20th and 21st centuries. However, in Mariam Petrosyan’s novel, in contrast to this literature, the images of tricksters are not cultivated. They preserve and show the werewolf, dark, dangerous nature. This interpretation of the trickster is connected with the specifics of the Russian literary tradition. Since the time of Romanticism, which established the model of two worlds, the other world in this tradition was usually presented as hostile to man. In the modern era, the two-world model has regained its validity. This was largely due to the fact that the aesthetics of Russian modernism adopted the Nietzschean concept of Dionysianism, specifically interpreted as an appeal to soil culture. However, on the part of traditionally thinking writers, such pochvennichestvo met with rejection. He was criticized by Ivan Bunin, in the story “Sukhodol”, contrasting Christianity with him as the only mechanism for preserving cultural memory. In the 21st century, in the stories of Elena Chizhova, Irina Bogatyreva, Evgenia Nekrasova, the model of two worlds with an appeal to soil culture was again actualized. The characters of the other world were depicted in them as assistants to the heroes, but at the same time unsafe and alien creatures. This interpretation of the trickster is close to the image of a magical assistant in a fairy tale. It was she who was realized in the novel by Mariam Petrosyan.\",\"PeriodicalId\":493916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Сюжетология и сюжетография\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Сюжетология и сюжетография\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25205/2713-3133-2023-2-91-99\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Сюжетология и сюжетография","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25205/2713-3133-2023-2-91-99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

玛丽亚姆·彼得罗相的小说《房子》,其中……使用了两个世界的模型,涉及几个十几岁的骗子英雄,他们可以进入另一个被称为“森林”的现实,并把其他孩子带到那里。在欧洲以儿童和青少年为对象的文学作品中,这种情节结构的典范是d·巴里的《彼得潘》。她的主人公与一个异教徒潘有关,他把普通家庭的男孩带到他的岛上。彼得潘不想长大,也不懂得爱;他带走的孩子一定是开朗无情的。彼得·潘岛上不动的时间和那里缺乏爱,使这个世界与基督教文化形成对比,但用尼采的话来说,它们使它更接近异教的酒神世界。这种建构在20世纪和21世纪的欧洲大众文学中取得了丰硕的成果。然而,在玛丽亚姆·彼得罗相的小说中,与这种文学相比,骗子的形象并没有被培养出来。他们保留并展示了狼人黑暗、危险的本性。这种对骗子的解释与俄国文学传统的特点有关。自从浪漫主义建立了两个世界的模型以来,这个传统中的另一个世界通常被呈现为对人类的敌意。在现代,“两个世界”模式重新获得了它的有效性。这在很大程度上是由于俄罗斯现代主义美学采用了尼采的酒神主义概念,具体解释为对土壤文化的呼吁。然而,从传统思想作家的角度来看,这样的波切文尼切斯特遭到了拒绝。Ivan Bunin在小说《Sukhodol》中批评他,将基督教与他对比,认为基督教是保存文化记忆的唯一机制。进入21世纪,在Elena Chizhova, Irina Bogatyreva, Evgenia Nekrasova的故事中,两个世界的模式和对土壤文化的诉求再次得到了实现。另一个世界的人物被描绘成英雄的助手,但同时也是不安全的外星生物。这种对骗子的解释接近于童话故事中魔法助手的形象。玛丽亚姆·彼得罗相的小说中,她的形象得到了体现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Between Pan and the Gray Wolf: Dionysian Variations
Mariam Petrosyan’s novel “The House in which ...” uses a model of two worlds and involves several teenage trickster heroes who can go into another reality called “The Forest”, as well as take other children there. The paradigm for such a plot structure in European literature aimed at children and adolescents is D. Barry’s book “Peter Pan”. Her hero is correlated with a pagan Pan, and he takes boys from ordinary families to his island. Peter Pan does not want to grow up and does not know love; the children he takes away must be cheerful and heartless. The immobile time on Peter Pan Island and the lack of love there contrast this world with Christian culture, but they bring it closer to the pagan – Dionysian world, in the words of F. Nietzsche. This construction proved to be very fruitful in the European mass literature of the 20th and 21st centuries. However, in Mariam Petrosyan’s novel, in contrast to this literature, the images of tricksters are not cultivated. They preserve and show the werewolf, dark, dangerous nature. This interpretation of the trickster is connected with the specifics of the Russian literary tradition. Since the time of Romanticism, which established the model of two worlds, the other world in this tradition was usually presented as hostile to man. In the modern era, the two-world model has regained its validity. This was largely due to the fact that the aesthetics of Russian modernism adopted the Nietzschean concept of Dionysianism, specifically interpreted as an appeal to soil culture. However, on the part of traditionally thinking writers, such pochvennichestvo met with rejection. He was criticized by Ivan Bunin, in the story “Sukhodol”, contrasting Christianity with him as the only mechanism for preserving cultural memory. In the 21st century, in the stories of Elena Chizhova, Irina Bogatyreva, Evgenia Nekrasova, the model of two worlds with an appeal to soil culture was again actualized. The characters of the other world were depicted in them as assistants to the heroes, but at the same time unsafe and alien creatures. This interpretation of the trickster is close to the image of a magical assistant in a fairy tale. It was she who was realized in the novel by Mariam Petrosyan.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信