一种合作模式,降低成本,提高石油和天然气现场甲烷泄漏检查的效率

IF 4.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Mozhou Gao, Chris H. Hugenholtz, Marshall Staples, Thomas E. Barchyn, Tyler R. Gough, Coleman Vollrath, Zhenyu Xing
{"title":"一种合作模式,降低成本,提高石油和天然气现场甲烷泄漏检查的效率","authors":"Mozhou Gao, Chris H. Hugenholtz, Marshall Staples, Thomas E. Barchyn, Tyler R. Gough, Coleman Vollrath, Zhenyu Xing","doi":"10.1525/elementa.2023.00030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Methane is a potent greenhouse gas that tends to leak from equipment at oil and gas (O&G) sites. Conventional leak detection and repair methods for fugitive methane emissions are labor-intensive and costly because they involve time-consuming close-range, component-level inspections at each site. This has prompted duty holders to examine new methods and strategies that could be more cost-effective. We examined a cooperative model in which multiple duty holders of upstream O&G sites in a region use shared services to inspect on-site equipment using optical gas imaging camera or Method 21. This approach was hypothesized to be more efficient and cost-effective than independent inspection programs by each duty holder in the region. To test this hypothesis, we developed a geospatial simulation model using empirical data from 11 O&G-producing regions in Canada and the United States. We used the model to compare labor cost, transit time, mileage, vehicle emissions, and driving risk between independent and co-op leak inspection programs. The results indicate that co-op leak inspection programs can generate relative savings in labor costs (1.8%–34.2%), transit time (0.6%–38.6%), mileage (0.2%–43.1%), vehicle emissions (0.01–4.0 tCO2), and driving risk (1.9%–31.9%). The largest relative savings and efficiency gains resulting from co-op leak inspection programs were in regions with a high diversity of duty holders, which was confirmed with simulations of fictitious O&G sites and road networks spanning diverse conditions. We also found reducing leak inspection time by 75% with streamlined methods can additionally reduce labor cost by 8.8%–41.1%, transit time by 5.6%–20.2%, and mileage by 2.60%–34.3% in co-op leak inspection programs. Overall, this study demonstrates that co-op leak inspection programs can be more efficient and cost-effective, particularly in regions with a large diversity of O&G duty holders, and that methods to reduce leak inspection time can create additional savings.","PeriodicalId":54279,"journal":{"name":"Elementa-Science of the Anthropocene","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cooperative model to lower cost and increase the efficiency of methane leak inspections at oil and gas sites\",\"authors\":\"Mozhou Gao, Chris H. Hugenholtz, Marshall Staples, Thomas E. Barchyn, Tyler R. Gough, Coleman Vollrath, Zhenyu Xing\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/elementa.2023.00030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Methane is a potent greenhouse gas that tends to leak from equipment at oil and gas (O&G) sites. Conventional leak detection and repair methods for fugitive methane emissions are labor-intensive and costly because they involve time-consuming close-range, component-level inspections at each site. This has prompted duty holders to examine new methods and strategies that could be more cost-effective. We examined a cooperative model in which multiple duty holders of upstream O&G sites in a region use shared services to inspect on-site equipment using optical gas imaging camera or Method 21. This approach was hypothesized to be more efficient and cost-effective than independent inspection programs by each duty holder in the region. To test this hypothesis, we developed a geospatial simulation model using empirical data from 11 O&G-producing regions in Canada and the United States. We used the model to compare labor cost, transit time, mileage, vehicle emissions, and driving risk between independent and co-op leak inspection programs. The results indicate that co-op leak inspection programs can generate relative savings in labor costs (1.8%–34.2%), transit time (0.6%–38.6%), mileage (0.2%–43.1%), vehicle emissions (0.01–4.0 tCO2), and driving risk (1.9%–31.9%). The largest relative savings and efficiency gains resulting from co-op leak inspection programs were in regions with a high diversity of duty holders, which was confirmed with simulations of fictitious O&G sites and road networks spanning diverse conditions. We also found reducing leak inspection time by 75% with streamlined methods can additionally reduce labor cost by 8.8%–41.1%, transit time by 5.6%–20.2%, and mileage by 2.60%–34.3% in co-op leak inspection programs. Overall, this study demonstrates that co-op leak inspection programs can be more efficient and cost-effective, particularly in regions with a large diversity of O&G duty holders, and that methods to reduce leak inspection time can create additional savings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Elementa-Science of the Anthropocene\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Elementa-Science of the Anthropocene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2023.00030\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Elementa-Science of the Anthropocene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2023.00030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

甲烷是一种强有力的温室气体,容易从石油和天然气(O&G)站点的设备中泄漏出来。针对逸散性甲烷排放的传统泄漏检测和修复方法是劳动密集型的,而且成本高昂,因为它们需要在每个站点进行耗时的近距离部件级检查。这促使责任持有人审查可能更具成本效益的新方法和战略。我们研究了一种合作模式,在这种合作模式中,一个地区上游油气站点的多个责任人使用共享服务,使用光学气体成像相机或方法21检查现场设备。这种方法被假设为比该地区每个职责持有人的独立检查计划更有效和更具成本效益。为了验证这一假设,我们利用加拿大和美国11个产油区的经验数据开发了一个地理空间模拟模型。我们使用该模型来比较独立和合作检漏方案之间的人工成本、运输时间、里程、车辆排放和驾驶风险。结果表明,合作检漏项目可以相对节省劳动力成本(1.8%-34.2%)、运输时间(0.6%-38.6%)、行驶里程(0.2%-43.1%)、车辆排放(0.01-4.0 tCO2)和驾驶风险(1.9%-31.9%)。通过模拟不同条件下的虚拟o&&g站点和道路网络,可以证实,合作泄漏检查项目在职责人员高度多样化的地区节省成本和提高效率的效果最大。我们还发现,采用简化的方法将泄漏检查时间减少75%,还可以减少8.8%-41.1%的人工成本,减少5.6%-20.2%的运输时间,减少2.60%-34.3%的里程。总的来说,这项研究表明,合作检漏计划可以更高效、更经济,特别是在石油和天然气责任人员多样化的地区,减少检漏时间的方法可以节省额外的费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A cooperative model to lower cost and increase the efficiency of methane leak inspections at oil and gas sites
Methane is a potent greenhouse gas that tends to leak from equipment at oil and gas (O&G) sites. Conventional leak detection and repair methods for fugitive methane emissions are labor-intensive and costly because they involve time-consuming close-range, component-level inspections at each site. This has prompted duty holders to examine new methods and strategies that could be more cost-effective. We examined a cooperative model in which multiple duty holders of upstream O&G sites in a region use shared services to inspect on-site equipment using optical gas imaging camera or Method 21. This approach was hypothesized to be more efficient and cost-effective than independent inspection programs by each duty holder in the region. To test this hypothesis, we developed a geospatial simulation model using empirical data from 11 O&G-producing regions in Canada and the United States. We used the model to compare labor cost, transit time, mileage, vehicle emissions, and driving risk between independent and co-op leak inspection programs. The results indicate that co-op leak inspection programs can generate relative savings in labor costs (1.8%–34.2%), transit time (0.6%–38.6%), mileage (0.2%–43.1%), vehicle emissions (0.01–4.0 tCO2), and driving risk (1.9%–31.9%). The largest relative savings and efficiency gains resulting from co-op leak inspection programs were in regions with a high diversity of duty holders, which was confirmed with simulations of fictitious O&G sites and road networks spanning diverse conditions. We also found reducing leak inspection time by 75% with streamlined methods can additionally reduce labor cost by 8.8%–41.1%, transit time by 5.6%–20.2%, and mileage by 2.60%–34.3% in co-op leak inspection programs. Overall, this study demonstrates that co-op leak inspection programs can be more efficient and cost-effective, particularly in regions with a large diversity of O&G duty holders, and that methods to reduce leak inspection time can create additional savings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Elementa-Science of the Anthropocene
Elementa-Science of the Anthropocene Earth and Planetary Sciences-Atmospheric Science
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: A new open-access scientific journal, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene publishes original research reporting on new knowledge of the Earth’s physical, chemical, and biological systems; interactions between human and natural systems; and steps that can be taken to mitigate and adapt to global change. Elementa reports on fundamental advancements in research organized initially into six knowledge domains, embracing the concept that basic knowledge can foster sustainable solutions for society. Elementa is published on an open-access, public-good basis—available freely and immediately to the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信