工程专业学生的混合与远程学习选择:以机械工程本科课程为例的统计分析

Q1 Mathematics
Ala’a Bataineh, Wafa Batayneh, Ibtesam Alomari
{"title":"工程专业学生的混合与远程学习选择:以机械工程本科课程为例的统计分析","authors":"Ala’a Bataineh, Wafa Batayneh, Ibtesam Alomari","doi":"10.15866/iremos.v16i3.22976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper a comparative study between hybrid and distance learning techniques is developed. The research presented herein has been conducted to identify the impacts of both hybrid learning and distance learning techniques on engineering students by considering one of the core undergraduate level courses in Mechanical Engineering, namely automatic control at a large public university in Jordan. The experiment has featured classroom data collection from students by using a questionnaire throughout two semesters. The first semester has adopted the distance learning technique, while the second semester has adopted the hybrid learning technique for the same course, with 34, and 31 students participated in the questioner, respectively. A statistical analysis for the data collected from students referring to the level of satisfaction for the way the material has been delivered to them, has been conducted to perform a comparison between the two approaches. A strength of this study is that the questioner data have been collected at key points throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and when lockdown has been forced by the government and the distance learning has been the only choice, and when the hybrid learning has been permitted in the second semester, allowing understanding and being able to distinguish between the hybrid and distance learning techniques from the students’ perspective. Results shows that the majority of the students have recommended the hybrid learning over the distance learning for this course. They have emphasized on the many advantages of such learning technique. The majority has also agreed on the many disadvantages of the distance learning technique for such engineering course. By combining these insights, recommendations for universities, including further improvement of the hybrid learning for engineering education, and most importantly, the fact that distance learning for engineering education has many disadvantages, have been made. Based on the study developed, this learning technique is not recommended for engineering education.","PeriodicalId":38950,"journal":{"name":"International Review on Modelling and Simulations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid Versus Distance Learning Choice for Engineering Students: a Statistical Analysis Case Study of Undergraduate-Level Mechanical Engineering Course\",\"authors\":\"Ala’a Bataineh, Wafa Batayneh, Ibtesam Alomari\",\"doi\":\"10.15866/iremos.v16i3.22976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper a comparative study between hybrid and distance learning techniques is developed. The research presented herein has been conducted to identify the impacts of both hybrid learning and distance learning techniques on engineering students by considering one of the core undergraduate level courses in Mechanical Engineering, namely automatic control at a large public university in Jordan. The experiment has featured classroom data collection from students by using a questionnaire throughout two semesters. The first semester has adopted the distance learning technique, while the second semester has adopted the hybrid learning technique for the same course, with 34, and 31 students participated in the questioner, respectively. A statistical analysis for the data collected from students referring to the level of satisfaction for the way the material has been delivered to them, has been conducted to perform a comparison between the two approaches. A strength of this study is that the questioner data have been collected at key points throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and when lockdown has been forced by the government and the distance learning has been the only choice, and when the hybrid learning has been permitted in the second semester, allowing understanding and being able to distinguish between the hybrid and distance learning techniques from the students’ perspective. Results shows that the majority of the students have recommended the hybrid learning over the distance learning for this course. They have emphasized on the many advantages of such learning technique. The majority has also agreed on the many disadvantages of the distance learning technique for such engineering course. By combining these insights, recommendations for universities, including further improvement of the hybrid learning for engineering education, and most importantly, the fact that distance learning for engineering education has many disadvantages, have been made. Based on the study developed, this learning technique is not recommended for engineering education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review on Modelling and Simulations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review on Modelling and Simulations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15866/iremos.v16i3.22976\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review on Modelling and Simulations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15866/iremos.v16i3.22976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对混合式和远程学习技术进行了比较研究。本文提出的研究以约旦一所大型公立大学的机械工程本科核心课程之一——自动控制为研究对象,以确定混合学习和远程学习技术对工程专业学生的影响。该实验的特点是通过在两个学期中使用问卷调查从学生那里收集课堂数据。第一学期采用远程学习技术,第二学期同一门课程采用混合学习技术,分别有34名和31名学生参与了提问者。对从学生那里收集的数据进行了统计分析,这些数据涉及到对教材交付给他们的方式的满意度,并对两种方法进行了比较。本研究的优势在于,在COVID-19大流行期间,在政府强制封锁和远程学习成为唯一选择的关键时刻,以及在第二学期允许混合学习的关键时刻,收集了提问者的数据,使学生能够理解并能够从学生的角度区分混合学习和远程学习技术。结果显示,大多数学生推荐混合式学习,而不是远程学习。他们强调了这种学习方法的许多优点。大多数人也同意远程学习技术对这种工程课程的许多缺点。通过结合这些见解,对大学提出了建议,包括进一步改进工程教育的混合学习,最重要的是,工程教育的远程学习有许多缺点。根据所开展的研究,这种学习方法不推荐用于工程教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hybrid Versus Distance Learning Choice for Engineering Students: a Statistical Analysis Case Study of Undergraduate-Level Mechanical Engineering Course
In this paper a comparative study between hybrid and distance learning techniques is developed. The research presented herein has been conducted to identify the impacts of both hybrid learning and distance learning techniques on engineering students by considering one of the core undergraduate level courses in Mechanical Engineering, namely automatic control at a large public university in Jordan. The experiment has featured classroom data collection from students by using a questionnaire throughout two semesters. The first semester has adopted the distance learning technique, while the second semester has adopted the hybrid learning technique for the same course, with 34, and 31 students participated in the questioner, respectively. A statistical analysis for the data collected from students referring to the level of satisfaction for the way the material has been delivered to them, has been conducted to perform a comparison between the two approaches. A strength of this study is that the questioner data have been collected at key points throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and when lockdown has been forced by the government and the distance learning has been the only choice, and when the hybrid learning has been permitted in the second semester, allowing understanding and being able to distinguish between the hybrid and distance learning techniques from the students’ perspective. Results shows that the majority of the students have recommended the hybrid learning over the distance learning for this course. They have emphasized on the many advantages of such learning technique. The majority has also agreed on the many disadvantages of the distance learning technique for such engineering course. By combining these insights, recommendations for universities, including further improvement of the hybrid learning for engineering education, and most importantly, the fact that distance learning for engineering education has many disadvantages, have been made. Based on the study developed, this learning technique is not recommended for engineering education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Review on Modelling and Simulations
International Review on Modelling and Simulations Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The International Review on Modelling and Simulations (IREMOS) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original theoretical and applied papers concerning Modelling, Numerical studies, Algorithms and Simulations in all the engineering fields. The topics to be covered include, but are not limited to: theoretical aspects of modelling and simulation, methods and algorithms for design control and validation of systems, tools for high performance computing simulation. The applied papers can deal with Modelling, Numerical studies, Algorithms and Simulations regarding all the engineering fields; particularly about the electrical engineering (power system, power electronics, automotive applications, power devices, energy conversion, electrical machines, lighting systems and so on), the mechanical engineering (kinematics and dynamics of rigid bodies, vehicle system dynamics, theory of machines and mechanisms, vibration and balancing of machine parts, stability of mechanical systems, computational mechanics, mechanics of materials and structures, plasticity, hydromechanics, aerodynamics, aeroelasticity, biomechanics, geomechanics, thermodynamics, heat transfer, refrigeration, fluid mechanics, micromechanics, nanomechanics, robotics, mechatronics, combustion theory, turbomachinery, manufacturing processes and so on), the chemical engineering (chemical reaction engineering, environmental chemical engineering, materials synthesis and processing and so on). IREMOS also publishes letters to the Editor and research notes which discuss new research, or research in progress in any of the above thematic areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信