韩国实施以福祉为中心的建筑认证制度的基础研究——以WELL和Fitwel认证的比较分析为中心

Yong-Hyun Yu
{"title":"韩国实施以福祉为中心的建筑认证制度的基础研究——以WELL和Fitwel认证的比较分析为中心","authors":"Yong-Hyun Yu","doi":"10.14774/jkiid.2023.32.3.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the evidence base reveals the multiple impacts of indoor spaces on human health, built environments that promote occupant health and well-being has become the imperative demands of our time. The growing interest in healthy building has led to an expansion of sustainability concepts in the contemporary urban and architectural discourses, as well as the emergence of new assessment tools that specifically designed to address these issues. This study aims to identify the content scope and features of health-related topics covered by well-being centric building certification schemes that have emerged within this background, and to establish a theoretical foundation for the development of certification criteria applicable in Korea. Incorporating the different organizational structures of the internationally accepted WELL and Fitwel standards, seven themes of indoor air quality, thermal comfort, visual and acoustic comfort, activity, healthy eating & drinking, psychological well-being, and social well-being that can be used to re-categorize the content of the two standards were identified through recurring topics in the academic literature. Adopting this as an analytical framework, this study conducted a qualitative comparison of the detailed requirements of the two standards. The results of the study provide reference points and insights that contribute to the implementation of well-being-centric building certification scheme in Korea.","PeriodicalId":497757,"journal":{"name":"Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Fundamental Study for the Implementation of Well-being-centric Building Certification Scheme in Korea - Focused on a Comparative Analysis of WELL and Fitwel Certifications -\",\"authors\":\"Yong-Hyun Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.14774/jkiid.2023.32.3.039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the evidence base reveals the multiple impacts of indoor spaces on human health, built environments that promote occupant health and well-being has become the imperative demands of our time. The growing interest in healthy building has led to an expansion of sustainability concepts in the contemporary urban and architectural discourses, as well as the emergence of new assessment tools that specifically designed to address these issues. This study aims to identify the content scope and features of health-related topics covered by well-being centric building certification schemes that have emerged within this background, and to establish a theoretical foundation for the development of certification criteria applicable in Korea. Incorporating the different organizational structures of the internationally accepted WELL and Fitwel standards, seven themes of indoor air quality, thermal comfort, visual and acoustic comfort, activity, healthy eating & drinking, psychological well-being, and social well-being that can be used to re-categorize the content of the two standards were identified through recurring topics in the academic literature. Adopting this as an analytical framework, this study conducted a qualitative comparison of the detailed requirements of the two standards. The results of the study provide reference points and insights that contribute to the implementation of well-being-centric building certification scheme in Korea.\",\"PeriodicalId\":497757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14774/jkiid.2023.32.3.039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14774/jkiid.2023.32.3.039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着证据基础揭示了室内空间对人类健康的多重影响,促进居住者健康和福祉的建筑环境已成为我们这个时代的迫切要求。对健康建筑日益增长的兴趣导致了可持续性概念在当代城市和建筑话语中的扩展,以及专门设计用于解决这些问题的新评估工具的出现。本研究旨在确定在此背景下出现的以福祉为中心的建筑认证计划所涵盖的健康相关主题的内容范围和特征,并为制定适用于韩国的认证标准奠定理论基础。结合国际公认的WELL和Fitwel标准的不同组织结构,通过学术文献中反复出现的主题,确定了室内空气质量、热舒适、视觉和声学舒适、活动、健康饮食、心理健康和社会健康等七个主题,可以用来重新分类两个标准的内容。本研究以此为分析框架,对两个标准的详细要求进行了定性比较。研究结果为韩国实施以福祉为中心的建筑认证制度提供了参考点和见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Fundamental Study for the Implementation of Well-being-centric Building Certification Scheme in Korea - Focused on a Comparative Analysis of WELL and Fitwel Certifications -
As the evidence base reveals the multiple impacts of indoor spaces on human health, built environments that promote occupant health and well-being has become the imperative demands of our time. The growing interest in healthy building has led to an expansion of sustainability concepts in the contemporary urban and architectural discourses, as well as the emergence of new assessment tools that specifically designed to address these issues. This study aims to identify the content scope and features of health-related topics covered by well-being centric building certification schemes that have emerged within this background, and to establish a theoretical foundation for the development of certification criteria applicable in Korea. Incorporating the different organizational structures of the internationally accepted WELL and Fitwel standards, seven themes of indoor air quality, thermal comfort, visual and acoustic comfort, activity, healthy eating & drinking, psychological well-being, and social well-being that can be used to re-categorize the content of the two standards were identified through recurring topics in the academic literature. Adopting this as an analytical framework, this study conducted a qualitative comparison of the detailed requirements of the two standards. The results of the study provide reference points and insights that contribute to the implementation of well-being-centric building certification scheme in Korea.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信