不同尺寸即刻加载种植体生物力学行为的有限元分析

Q4 Dentistry
Teodora Mihali, Cherana Gioga, Paula Perlea, Costin Coman, Violeta Hancu, Monica Voiculeanu, Mihail Tarcolea, Raluca Monica Comaneanu
{"title":"不同尺寸即刻加载种植体生物力学行为的有限元分析","authors":"Teodora Mihali, Cherana Gioga, Paula Perlea, Costin Coman, Violeta Hancu, Monica Voiculeanu, Mihail Tarcolea, Raluca Monica Comaneanu","doi":"10.37897/rjs.2023.2.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives. The purpose of this research was to study, in the case of immediate loading, the biomechanical effect produced by the length of the implants. Material and method. The study material was a CBCT analysis performed on a patient from one dental office in Bucharest. An segment of edentulous mandibular bone was selected from the CBCT, which was processed with Mimics Innovation Suite, respectively Mimics and 3-matic. After processing the bone segment, two implants of the same manufacturer, with identical design, but different length – 10 and 13 mm respectively, were selected from the BIOMAT database. To simulate immediate loading, the bone-implant interface was not blocked and the mandible was defined with properties that characterize a bone with moderate density. A perpendicular masticatory force of 200N was applied to each of the two implants. The software ANSYS calculated the minimum, maximum values and their geometric means for the possible stresses produced on both the shorter implant (10 mm) and the longer implant (13 mm). Results. In the case of short implants, higher average stresses develop along the entire length of the implant, towards the vestibular bone plate, while in the case of long implants the higher stress seems to be cantoned towards the apical side. Conclusions. The present study shows that, in the case of immediate loading, the use of longer implants (13 mm) reduces by more than 50% the geometric mean of the stresses to which the bone-implant interface is subjected than in the case of the use of shorter implants (10 mm). In both types of implants, higher stresses occur at the level of the screw fixing the abutment in the implant.","PeriodicalId":33514,"journal":{"name":"Revista Romana de Stomatologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FEA on the biomechanical behavior of immediately loaded implants with different sizes\",\"authors\":\"Teodora Mihali, Cherana Gioga, Paula Perlea, Costin Coman, Violeta Hancu, Monica Voiculeanu, Mihail Tarcolea, Raluca Monica Comaneanu\",\"doi\":\"10.37897/rjs.2023.2.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives. The purpose of this research was to study, in the case of immediate loading, the biomechanical effect produced by the length of the implants. Material and method. The study material was a CBCT analysis performed on a patient from one dental office in Bucharest. An segment of edentulous mandibular bone was selected from the CBCT, which was processed with Mimics Innovation Suite, respectively Mimics and 3-matic. After processing the bone segment, two implants of the same manufacturer, with identical design, but different length – 10 and 13 mm respectively, were selected from the BIOMAT database. To simulate immediate loading, the bone-implant interface was not blocked and the mandible was defined with properties that characterize a bone with moderate density. A perpendicular masticatory force of 200N was applied to each of the two implants. The software ANSYS calculated the minimum, maximum values and their geometric means for the possible stresses produced on both the shorter implant (10 mm) and the longer implant (13 mm). Results. In the case of short implants, higher average stresses develop along the entire length of the implant, towards the vestibular bone plate, while in the case of long implants the higher stress seems to be cantoned towards the apical side. Conclusions. The present study shows that, in the case of immediate loading, the use of longer implants (13 mm) reduces by more than 50% the geometric mean of the stresses to which the bone-implant interface is subjected than in the case of the use of shorter implants (10 mm). In both types of implants, higher stresses occur at the level of the screw fixing the abutment in the implant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Romana de Stomatologie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Romana de Stomatologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37897/rjs.2023.2.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Romana de Stomatologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37897/rjs.2023.2.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标。本研究的目的是研究在即刻加载的情况下,种植体长度产生的生物力学效应。材料和方法。研究材料是对布加勒斯特一家牙科诊所的患者进行的CBCT分析。从CBCT中选取一段无牙下颌骨,分别使用Mimics创新套件Mimics和3-matic进行处理。在处理骨段后,从BIOMAT数据库中选择两个相同制造商,设计相同但长度不同的种植体,分别为10和13 mm。为了模拟即时加载,骨-种植体界面不被阻塞,下颌骨被定义为具有中等密度骨的特征。两个种植体分别施加200N的垂直咀嚼力。ANSYS软件计算了短种植体(10mm)和长种植体(13mm)上可能产生的应力的最小值、最大值及其几何平均值。结果。在短种植体的情况下,较高的平均应力沿种植体的整个长度发展,朝向前庭骨板,而在长种植体的情况下,较高的应力似乎朝向根尖侧。结论。目前的研究表明,在立即加载的情况下,使用较长的种植体(13mm)比使用较短的种植体(10mm)减少了50%以上的几何平均应力,骨-种植体界面受到的应力。在这两种类型的种植体中,较高的应力发生在固定种植体中基台的螺钉水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FEA on the biomechanical behavior of immediately loaded implants with different sizes
Objectives. The purpose of this research was to study, in the case of immediate loading, the biomechanical effect produced by the length of the implants. Material and method. The study material was a CBCT analysis performed on a patient from one dental office in Bucharest. An segment of edentulous mandibular bone was selected from the CBCT, which was processed with Mimics Innovation Suite, respectively Mimics and 3-matic. After processing the bone segment, two implants of the same manufacturer, with identical design, but different length – 10 and 13 mm respectively, were selected from the BIOMAT database. To simulate immediate loading, the bone-implant interface was not blocked and the mandible was defined with properties that characterize a bone with moderate density. A perpendicular masticatory force of 200N was applied to each of the two implants. The software ANSYS calculated the minimum, maximum values and their geometric means for the possible stresses produced on both the shorter implant (10 mm) and the longer implant (13 mm). Results. In the case of short implants, higher average stresses develop along the entire length of the implant, towards the vestibular bone plate, while in the case of long implants the higher stress seems to be cantoned towards the apical side. Conclusions. The present study shows that, in the case of immediate loading, the use of longer implants (13 mm) reduces by more than 50% the geometric mean of the stresses to which the bone-implant interface is subjected than in the case of the use of shorter implants (10 mm). In both types of implants, higher stresses occur at the level of the screw fixing the abutment in the implant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信