神经性贪食的药物治疗效果:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析

Sijie Yu, yafeng Song, Chongkai Shen, Fei Shao
{"title":"神经性贪食的药物治疗效果:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Sijie Yu, yafeng Song, Chongkai Shen, Fei Shao","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3315948/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective The main purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of different medications used to treat bulimia nervosa(BN). Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from published sources through searches in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase, from inception to November 2022. Primary outcomes were: changes in the frequency of binge eating episodes and vomiting episodes from baseline to endpoint. Secondary outcomes were difference in the improvement of scores in depressive symptoms; tolerability (dropout due to adverse events) and weight change. Results The literature search ultimately included 11 drugs, 33 studies and 6 types of medicine, 8 trials with TCAs (imipramine, desipramine and amitriptyline), 14 with SSRIs (fluoxetine, citalopram and fluvoxamine), 6 with MAOIs (phenelzine, moclobemide and brofaromine), 3 with antiepileptic drugs (topiramate), 1 with mood stabilizer (lithium), 1 with amphetamine-type appetite suppressant (fenfluramine). In the reduction of binge eating episodes was more likely on these drugs than placebo, the SMD was − 0.4 (95% CI -0.61~-0.19); about the changes in the frequency of vomiting episodes (SMD=-0.16, 95% CI -0.3~-0.03); weight (WMD=-3.05, 95% CI -5.97~-0.13); depressive symptoms (SMD=-0.29 ,95% CI -0.48~-0.11). However, no statistical difference was found in dropout due to adverse events (RR = 1.62, 95% CI 0.98 ~ 2.67). Conclusions This meta-analysis indicates that most pharmacotherapies declined the frequency of binge-eating and vomiting episode, body weight, and depressive symptoms in BN patients, but the efficacy is not very significant. In each medicine, the efficacy is not the same, which through different aspects, different symptoms to improve the clinical performance of bulimia nervosa.","PeriodicalId":500086,"journal":{"name":"Research Square (Research Square)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of pharmacotherapies for bulimia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Sijie Yu, yafeng Song, Chongkai Shen, Fei Shao\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3315948/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objective The main purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of different medications used to treat bulimia nervosa(BN). Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from published sources through searches in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase, from inception to November 2022. Primary outcomes were: changes in the frequency of binge eating episodes and vomiting episodes from baseline to endpoint. Secondary outcomes were difference in the improvement of scores in depressive symptoms; tolerability (dropout due to adverse events) and weight change. Results The literature search ultimately included 11 drugs, 33 studies and 6 types of medicine, 8 trials with TCAs (imipramine, desipramine and amitriptyline), 14 with SSRIs (fluoxetine, citalopram and fluvoxamine), 6 with MAOIs (phenelzine, moclobemide and brofaromine), 3 with antiepileptic drugs (topiramate), 1 with mood stabilizer (lithium), 1 with amphetamine-type appetite suppressant (fenfluramine). In the reduction of binge eating episodes was more likely on these drugs than placebo, the SMD was − 0.4 (95% CI -0.61~-0.19); about the changes in the frequency of vomiting episodes (SMD=-0.16, 95% CI -0.3~-0.03); weight (WMD=-3.05, 95% CI -5.97~-0.13); depressive symptoms (SMD=-0.29 ,95% CI -0.48~-0.11). However, no statistical difference was found in dropout due to adverse events (RR = 1.62, 95% CI 0.98 ~ 2.67). Conclusions This meta-analysis indicates that most pharmacotherapies declined the frequency of binge-eating and vomiting episode, body weight, and depressive symptoms in BN patients, but the efficacy is not very significant. In each medicine, the efficacy is not the same, which through different aspects, different symptoms to improve the clinical performance of bulimia nervosa.\",\"PeriodicalId\":500086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Square (Research Square)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Square (Research Square)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3315948/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Square (Research Square)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3315948/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的评价不同药物治疗神经性贪食症(BN)的疗效和耐受性。方法通过PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science和Embase的检索,从成立至2022年11月的已发表文献中筛选随机对照试验(RCTs)。主要结局是:暴食发作和呕吐发作频率从基线到终点的变化。次要结局是抑郁症状得分改善的差异;耐受性(因不良事件退出)和体重变化。结果最终纳入11种药物、33项研究、6种药物,其中TCAs 8项(丙咪嗪、地西帕明、阿米替林),SSRIs 14项(氟西汀、西酞普兰、氟伏沙明),MAOIs 6项(苯乙嗪、莫氯贝胺、溴法明),抗癫痫药物3项(托吡酯),情绪稳定剂1项(锂),安非他明类食欲抑制剂1项(芬氟拉明)。与安慰剂相比,这些药物更有可能减少暴食发作,SMD为- 0.4 (95% CI -0.61~-0.19);呕吐次数的变化(SMD=-0.16, 95% CI -0.3~-0.03);权重(WMD=-3.05, 95% CI -5.97~-0.13);抑郁症状(SMD=-0.29,95% CI -0.48~-0.11)。但因不良事件导致的中途退学无统计学差异(RR = 1.62, 95% CI 0.98 ~ 2.67)。结论本荟萃分析显示,大多数药物治疗均能降低BN患者暴食呕吐发作频率、体重和抑郁症状,但疗效不显著。在每一种药物中,疗效都是不一样的,这就需要通过不同的方面,不同的症状来改善神经性贪食的临床表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of pharmacotherapies for bulimia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract Objective The main purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of different medications used to treat bulimia nervosa(BN). Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from published sources through searches in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase, from inception to November 2022. Primary outcomes were: changes in the frequency of binge eating episodes and vomiting episodes from baseline to endpoint. Secondary outcomes were difference in the improvement of scores in depressive symptoms; tolerability (dropout due to adverse events) and weight change. Results The literature search ultimately included 11 drugs, 33 studies and 6 types of medicine, 8 trials with TCAs (imipramine, desipramine and amitriptyline), 14 with SSRIs (fluoxetine, citalopram and fluvoxamine), 6 with MAOIs (phenelzine, moclobemide and brofaromine), 3 with antiepileptic drugs (topiramate), 1 with mood stabilizer (lithium), 1 with amphetamine-type appetite suppressant (fenfluramine). In the reduction of binge eating episodes was more likely on these drugs than placebo, the SMD was − 0.4 (95% CI -0.61~-0.19); about the changes in the frequency of vomiting episodes (SMD=-0.16, 95% CI -0.3~-0.03); weight (WMD=-3.05, 95% CI -5.97~-0.13); depressive symptoms (SMD=-0.29 ,95% CI -0.48~-0.11). However, no statistical difference was found in dropout due to adverse events (RR = 1.62, 95% CI 0.98 ~ 2.67). Conclusions This meta-analysis indicates that most pharmacotherapies declined the frequency of binge-eating and vomiting episode, body weight, and depressive symptoms in BN patients, but the efficacy is not very significant. In each medicine, the efficacy is not the same, which through different aspects, different symptoms to improve the clinical performance of bulimia nervosa.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信