慢性便秘伴合并症:对其诊断和治疗的临床观点的医师调查

Rakesh Kumar, S. R. Ramakrishnan, Ashwin Kulkarni
{"title":"慢性便秘伴合并症:对其诊断和治疗的临床观点的医师调查","authors":"Rakesh Kumar, S. R. Ramakrishnan, Ashwin Kulkarni","doi":"10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20232834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This survey aimed to investigate physicians’ perspectives on chronic constipation in patients with comorbidities, diagnosis and management of CC, and preferred laxatives used for treating CC in these patients. Methods: A 32-item, questionnaire-based online survey was conducted among 243 consulting physicians to gather information about CC with comorbidities, diagnosis and management strategies, and preferred laxatives. Results: The survey showed that 10%-39% of patients experienced CC for >3 months as reported by 61.7% of physicians, with diabetes being the most common comorbid condition. Patient noncompliance (93.8%) was identified as the main factor affecting management outcomes. The most preferred laxative by physicians in adult patients and the elderly was the combination of liquid paraffin+MOM+sodium picosulfate. The primary parameters considered by physicians when choosing a laxative were efficacy and tolerability. The laxative containing liquid paraffin + MOM + sodium picosulfate was reported to be effective for overnight relief by 44.9% of physicians in 60%-89% of patients. Physicians largely opined that side effects such as nausea/vomiting, abdominal cramps/pain, and anal seepage/ incontinence occurred in <1% of patients treated with liquid paraffin+MOM+sodium picosulfate. Conclusions: Clinical features aid in diagnosing CC and physicians prioritize treatment effectiveness when selecting laxatives. The participating physicians opined that combination laxatives consisting of liquid paraffin+MOM+sodium picosulfate are effective and well-tolerated for managing CC in patients with comorbidities. Hence, it is essential to consider their use for effective management of CC with comorbidities.","PeriodicalId":13827,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advances in Medicine","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chronic constipation with associated comorbid conditions: a physician survey on clinical perspectives on its diagnosis and management\",\"authors\":\"Rakesh Kumar, S. R. Ramakrishnan, Ashwin Kulkarni\",\"doi\":\"10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20232834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: This survey aimed to investigate physicians’ perspectives on chronic constipation in patients with comorbidities, diagnosis and management of CC, and preferred laxatives used for treating CC in these patients. Methods: A 32-item, questionnaire-based online survey was conducted among 243 consulting physicians to gather information about CC with comorbidities, diagnosis and management strategies, and preferred laxatives. Results: The survey showed that 10%-39% of patients experienced CC for >3 months as reported by 61.7% of physicians, with diabetes being the most common comorbid condition. Patient noncompliance (93.8%) was identified as the main factor affecting management outcomes. The most preferred laxative by physicians in adult patients and the elderly was the combination of liquid paraffin+MOM+sodium picosulfate. The primary parameters considered by physicians when choosing a laxative were efficacy and tolerability. The laxative containing liquid paraffin + MOM + sodium picosulfate was reported to be effective for overnight relief by 44.9% of physicians in 60%-89% of patients. Physicians largely opined that side effects such as nausea/vomiting, abdominal cramps/pain, and anal seepage/ incontinence occurred in <1% of patients treated with liquid paraffin+MOM+sodium picosulfate. Conclusions: Clinical features aid in diagnosing CC and physicians prioritize treatment effectiveness when selecting laxatives. The participating physicians opined that combination laxatives consisting of liquid paraffin+MOM+sodium picosulfate are effective and well-tolerated for managing CC in patients with comorbidities. Hence, it is essential to consider their use for effective management of CC with comorbidities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Advances in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"125 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Advances in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20232834\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advances in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20232834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本调查旨在探讨医生对慢性便秘合并症患者的看法,CC的诊断和管理,以及治疗CC的首选泻药。方法:对243名咨询医师进行了一项32项的在线问卷调查,以收集CC合并症、诊断和管理策略以及首选泻药的信息。结果:调查显示,61.7%的医生报告,10%-39%的患者经历了3个月的CC,其中糖尿病是最常见的合并症。患者不遵医嘱(93.8%)被认为是影响治疗结果的主要因素。成人患者和老年患者中,医生最喜欢的泻药是液体石蜡+MOM+ picosulfate钠的组合。医生在选择泻药时考虑的主要参数是疗效和耐受性。据报道,在60%-89%的患者中,44.9%的医生使用含有液体石蜡+ MOM + pico硫酸钠的泻药可有效缓解夜间症状。医生普遍认为,液体石蜡+MOM+ pico硫酸钠治疗的患者中有1%出现恶心/呕吐、腹部痉挛/疼痛、肛门渗漏/尿失禁等副作用。结论:临床特征有助于诊断CC,医生在选择泻药时优先考虑治疗效果。参与研究的医生认为,液体石蜡+MOM+ picosulfate钠组成的联合泻药对于治疗有合并症的CC患者是有效且耐受性良好的。因此,有必要考虑使用它们来有效地管理伴有合并症的CC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chronic constipation with associated comorbid conditions: a physician survey on clinical perspectives on its diagnosis and management
Background: This survey aimed to investigate physicians’ perspectives on chronic constipation in patients with comorbidities, diagnosis and management of CC, and preferred laxatives used for treating CC in these patients. Methods: A 32-item, questionnaire-based online survey was conducted among 243 consulting physicians to gather information about CC with comorbidities, diagnosis and management strategies, and preferred laxatives. Results: The survey showed that 10%-39% of patients experienced CC for >3 months as reported by 61.7% of physicians, with diabetes being the most common comorbid condition. Patient noncompliance (93.8%) was identified as the main factor affecting management outcomes. The most preferred laxative by physicians in adult patients and the elderly was the combination of liquid paraffin+MOM+sodium picosulfate. The primary parameters considered by physicians when choosing a laxative were efficacy and tolerability. The laxative containing liquid paraffin + MOM + sodium picosulfate was reported to be effective for overnight relief by 44.9% of physicians in 60%-89% of patients. Physicians largely opined that side effects such as nausea/vomiting, abdominal cramps/pain, and anal seepage/ incontinence occurred in <1% of patients treated with liquid paraffin+MOM+sodium picosulfate. Conclusions: Clinical features aid in diagnosing CC and physicians prioritize treatment effectiveness when selecting laxatives. The participating physicians opined that combination laxatives consisting of liquid paraffin+MOM+sodium picosulfate are effective and well-tolerated for managing CC in patients with comorbidities. Hence, it is essential to consider their use for effective management of CC with comorbidities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信