一项无效法律的哲学

Antonina Tokarska, Markiyan Dobryanskyi
{"title":"一项无效法律的哲学","authors":"Antonina Tokarska, Markiyan Dobryanskyi","doi":"10.23939/law2023.38.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The relevance of the study lies in the study of negative trends of real reality in the life of Ukrainian society against the background of the international authority of our state. The problems of not fully effective operation of the law during the period of martial law and the inconsistency of the existing mechanisms for the protection of human rights and freedoms to the needs of citizens were considered. An overview of the restrictions that were introduced during the legal regime of martial law was made. Attention is focused on the unbalanced distribution of the role of the parliamentary-presidential model of interaction of all branches of government in society: the President, the National Security and Defense Council, as well as the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine for the purpose of legal regulation of public life in Ukraine. The research was carried out on the basis of a sociological survey conducted in order to determine the assessment of the legal ideology of martial law (128 people). Existing legislative conflicts in the sphere of restriction of the right to freedom of speech and security are highlighted.","PeriodicalId":490087,"journal":{"name":"Вісник Національного університету \"Львівська політехніка\"","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The philosophy of a law that doesn`t work\",\"authors\":\"Antonina Tokarska, Markiyan Dobryanskyi\",\"doi\":\"10.23939/law2023.38.104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. The relevance of the study lies in the study of negative trends of real reality in the life of Ukrainian society against the background of the international authority of our state. The problems of not fully effective operation of the law during the period of martial law and the inconsistency of the existing mechanisms for the protection of human rights and freedoms to the needs of citizens were considered. An overview of the restrictions that were introduced during the legal regime of martial law was made. Attention is focused on the unbalanced distribution of the role of the parliamentary-presidential model of interaction of all branches of government in society: the President, the National Security and Defense Council, as well as the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine for the purpose of legal regulation of public life in Ukraine. The research was carried out on the basis of a sociological survey conducted in order to determine the assessment of the legal ideology of martial law (128 people). Existing legislative conflicts in the sphere of restriction of the right to freedom of speech and security are highlighted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":490087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Вісник Національного університету \\\"Львівська політехніка\\\"\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Вісник Національного університету \\\"Львівська політехніка\\\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23939/law2023.38.104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Вісник Національного університету \"Львівська політехніка\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23939/law2023.38.104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要该研究的相关性在于在我国国际权威的背景下研究乌克兰社会生活中真实现实的消极趋势。审议了在戒严期间法律没有充分有效运作的问题,以及保护人权和自由的现有机制不符合公民的需要的问题。对戒严法律制度期间实行的限制进行了概述。关注的重点是议会-总统模式在社会中所有政府部门的互动作用的不平衡分配:总统、国家安全和国防委员会以及乌克兰内阁部长,以便对乌克兰的公共生活进行法律规制。此次调查是为了确定对戒严法律思想的评价而进行的社会学调查(128人)的基础上进行的。在限制言论自由权和安全权方面存在的立法冲突得到了强调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The philosophy of a law that doesn`t work
Abstract. The relevance of the study lies in the study of negative trends of real reality in the life of Ukrainian society against the background of the international authority of our state. The problems of not fully effective operation of the law during the period of martial law and the inconsistency of the existing mechanisms for the protection of human rights and freedoms to the needs of citizens were considered. An overview of the restrictions that were introduced during the legal regime of martial law was made. Attention is focused on the unbalanced distribution of the role of the parliamentary-presidential model of interaction of all branches of government in society: the President, the National Security and Defense Council, as well as the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine for the purpose of legal regulation of public life in Ukraine. The research was carried out on the basis of a sociological survey conducted in order to determine the assessment of the legal ideology of martial law (128 people). Existing legislative conflicts in the sphere of restriction of the right to freedom of speech and security are highlighted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信