{"title":"现有混凝土桥梁的荷载测试评估:代码实施的障碍和建议的解决方案","authors":"Eva O. L. Lantsoght","doi":"10.1080/15732479.2023.2264825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the existing bridge stock is aging, the task of assessing these bridges becomes increasingly important. One of the assessment methods for existing bridges is load testing. Improvements in the field of diagnostic load testing are related to the use of numerical models. Improvements in the field of proof load testing focus on the safety of the execution of the test as well as the required load in the test. What is still lacking is a reflection of these recent advances in the codes and guidelines used for load testing of bridges. Two approaches are proposed to address this lack. The first approach attempts to answer fundamental questions with regard to bridge load testing through research. The second approach is to coordinate efforts and facilitate collaboration and exchange of ideas internationally through the IABMAS Technical Committee on Bridge Load Testing. In conclusion, it is expected that these efforts will form the basis of improved recommendations for the assessment of concrete bridges by load testing to be included in codes and guidelines and to serve the community of engineers faced with the task of assessing ageing infrastructure.","PeriodicalId":49468,"journal":{"name":"Structure and Infrastructure Engineering","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of existing concrete bridges by load testing: barriers to code implementation and proposed solutions\",\"authors\":\"Eva O. L. Lantsoght\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15732479.2023.2264825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the existing bridge stock is aging, the task of assessing these bridges becomes increasingly important. One of the assessment methods for existing bridges is load testing. Improvements in the field of diagnostic load testing are related to the use of numerical models. Improvements in the field of proof load testing focus on the safety of the execution of the test as well as the required load in the test. What is still lacking is a reflection of these recent advances in the codes and guidelines used for load testing of bridges. Two approaches are proposed to address this lack. The first approach attempts to answer fundamental questions with regard to bridge load testing through research. The second approach is to coordinate efforts and facilitate collaboration and exchange of ideas internationally through the IABMAS Technical Committee on Bridge Load Testing. In conclusion, it is expected that these efforts will form the basis of improved recommendations for the assessment of concrete bridges by load testing to be included in codes and guidelines and to serve the community of engineers faced with the task of assessing ageing infrastructure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structure and Infrastructure Engineering\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structure and Infrastructure Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2023.2264825\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structure and Infrastructure Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2023.2264825","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of existing concrete bridges by load testing: barriers to code implementation and proposed solutions
As the existing bridge stock is aging, the task of assessing these bridges becomes increasingly important. One of the assessment methods for existing bridges is load testing. Improvements in the field of diagnostic load testing are related to the use of numerical models. Improvements in the field of proof load testing focus on the safety of the execution of the test as well as the required load in the test. What is still lacking is a reflection of these recent advances in the codes and guidelines used for load testing of bridges. Two approaches are proposed to address this lack. The first approach attempts to answer fundamental questions with regard to bridge load testing through research. The second approach is to coordinate efforts and facilitate collaboration and exchange of ideas internationally through the IABMAS Technical Committee on Bridge Load Testing. In conclusion, it is expected that these efforts will form the basis of improved recommendations for the assessment of concrete bridges by load testing to be included in codes and guidelines and to serve the community of engineers faced with the task of assessing ageing infrastructure.
期刊介绍:
Structure and Infrastructure Engineering - Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle Design and Performance is an international Journal dedicated to recent advances in maintenance, management and life-cycle performance of a wide range of infrastructures, such as: buildings, bridges, dams, railways, underground constructions, offshore platforms, pipelines, naval vessels, ocean structures, nuclear power plants, airplanes and other types of structures including aerospace and automotive structures.
The Journal presents research and developments on the most advanced technologies for analyzing, predicting and optimizing infrastructure performance. The main gaps to be filled are those between researchers and practitioners in maintenance, management and life-cycle performance of infrastructure systems, and those between professionals working on different types of infrastructures. To this end, the journal will provide a forum for a broad blend of scientific, technical and practical papers. The journal is endorsed by the International Association for Life-Cycle Civil Engineering ( IALCCE) and the International Association for Bridge Maintenance and Safety ( IABMAS).