测量患者对综合用药管理(CMM)服务满意度的工具:范围审查

IF 0.5 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lorayne Caroline Resende, Mariana Michel Barbosa, Cristiane de Paula Rezende, Laís Lessa Neiva Pantuza, Edna Afonso Reis, Mariana Martins Gonzaga Nascimento
{"title":"测量患者对综合用药管理(CMM)服务满意度的工具:范围审查","authors":"Lorayne Caroline Resende, Mariana Michel Barbosa, Cristiane de Paula Rezende, Laís Lessa Neiva Pantuza, Edna Afonso Reis, Mariana Martins Gonzaga Nascimento","doi":"10.1093/jphsr/rmad044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives To map the instruments to measure patient satisfaction with comprehensive medication management (CMM) services and to compare them according to their development characteristics and applicability of patient-reported outcome measures (PRO) measures. Methods A scoping review was conducted using the methodology proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Studies that developed or applied a patient satisfaction measurement instrument in CMM services, published from 1990 onwards were selected. The critical appraisal of the instruments identified was carried out using an 18 item checklist developed to systematically evaluate PRO measures. Key findings A total of 28 studies were selected; in most (17), the applied instruments had been developed by the authors. Nine of them were validated, most of which used open-ended and closed questions in self-administered printed instruments. The best-qualified instrument reached 11 out of the 18 evaluated items, highlighting the difficulty in the definition of the satisfaction construct. Conclusions The review made it possible to identify the instruments available to measure patient satisfaction with CMM services and to comparatively highlight their characteristics and psychometric properties. It also pointed out the need to improve or develop a patient satisfaction instrument for CMM services. However, improvement is needed in many of the evaluated domains of the instruments to meet the desirable requirements for a PRO measure. These gaps should be taken into consideration in future research, aiming to build a robust and standardized instrument for the CMM service.","PeriodicalId":16705,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Instruments to measure patient satisfaction with comprehensive medication management (CMM) services: a scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Lorayne Caroline Resende, Mariana Michel Barbosa, Cristiane de Paula Rezende, Laís Lessa Neiva Pantuza, Edna Afonso Reis, Mariana Martins Gonzaga Nascimento\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jphsr/rmad044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives To map the instruments to measure patient satisfaction with comprehensive medication management (CMM) services and to compare them according to their development characteristics and applicability of patient-reported outcome measures (PRO) measures. Methods A scoping review was conducted using the methodology proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Studies that developed or applied a patient satisfaction measurement instrument in CMM services, published from 1990 onwards were selected. The critical appraisal of the instruments identified was carried out using an 18 item checklist developed to systematically evaluate PRO measures. Key findings A total of 28 studies were selected; in most (17), the applied instruments had been developed by the authors. Nine of them were validated, most of which used open-ended and closed questions in self-administered printed instruments. The best-qualified instrument reached 11 out of the 18 evaluated items, highlighting the difficulty in the definition of the satisfaction construct. Conclusions The review made it possible to identify the instruments available to measure patient satisfaction with CMM services and to comparatively highlight their characteristics and psychometric properties. It also pointed out the need to improve or develop a patient satisfaction instrument for CMM services. However, improvement is needed in many of the evaluated domains of the instruments to meet the desirable requirements for a PRO measure. These gaps should be taken into consideration in future research, aiming to build a robust and standardized instrument for the CMM service.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jphsr/rmad044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jphsr/rmad044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【摘要】目的绘制综合用药管理(CMM)服务满意度测评工具图谱,比较其发展特点和患者报告结果测量(PRO)指标的适用性。方法采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所和PRISMA范围审查扩展(PRISMA- scr)提出的方法进行范围审查。研究开发或应用的病人满意度测量工具在CMM服务,从1990年以来发表的选择。对所确定的仪器进行了批判性评估,使用了一份18项清单来系统地评估PRO措施。本研究共纳入28项研究;在大多数(17)中,应用的仪器是由作者开发的。其中9项已得到验证,其中大多数在自行管理的印刷文书中使用开放式和封闭式问题。在18个评估项目中,最合格的工具达到了11个,突出了满意度结构定义的难度。结论本综述确定了可用的测量CMM服务患者满意度的工具,并比较突出了它们的特点和心理测量学性质。报告还指出,有必要改进或开发一种患者满意度测量工具。然而,仪器的许多评估领域需要改进,以满足PRO测量的理想要求。这些差距应该在未来的研究中加以考虑,旨在为CMM服务建立一个健壮和标准化的仪器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Instruments to measure patient satisfaction with comprehensive medication management (CMM) services: a scoping review
Abstract Objectives To map the instruments to measure patient satisfaction with comprehensive medication management (CMM) services and to compare them according to their development characteristics and applicability of patient-reported outcome measures (PRO) measures. Methods A scoping review was conducted using the methodology proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Studies that developed or applied a patient satisfaction measurement instrument in CMM services, published from 1990 onwards were selected. The critical appraisal of the instruments identified was carried out using an 18 item checklist developed to systematically evaluate PRO measures. Key findings A total of 28 studies were selected; in most (17), the applied instruments had been developed by the authors. Nine of them were validated, most of which used open-ended and closed questions in self-administered printed instruments. The best-qualified instrument reached 11 out of the 18 evaluated items, highlighting the difficulty in the definition of the satisfaction construct. Conclusions The review made it possible to identify the instruments available to measure patient satisfaction with CMM services and to comparatively highlight their characteristics and psychometric properties. It also pointed out the need to improve or develop a patient satisfaction instrument for CMM services. However, improvement is needed in many of the evaluated domains of the instruments to meet the desirable requirements for a PRO measure. These gaps should be taken into consideration in future research, aiming to build a robust and standardized instrument for the CMM service.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信